Uci Vs. Ucsd I Need Some Help!!!!!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

tbruin

New Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been accepted to both uci and ucsd and having a very hard time trying to decide between the two schools by this weekend so i need a lot of help, advice, opinions, or anything else. So I have heard the usual.... ucsd is too competitive, too much classtime, but better ranking, better name, and it's in San Diego. UCI students are "happy", get awesome board scores, and are "happy". Can current uci and ucsd students help me out here? Also, are there others who are making the same decision and having similar problems? What did it come down to for you guys? ..... man struggling and running out of time. 😀

thanks ya'll.

Members don't see this ad.
 
first off, congrats!!!

hard choice. if i had to choose, i would consider...

location (both are beautiful. but where did you grow up?)
are you thinking of going into academics-->ucsd.
are you tired...do you want to be more layed back? --->uci
are you passionate about something? which school can give you more opportunities?
research...part of the curriculum at sd. i like that.
do you want to go somewhere with lots of people around (on campus)-->ucsd, relatively speaking.
i would also look at match list...which school had more people in the past staying for residency? thats something very important for me...if i want to do a competitive residency, i would know that knowing people at my school will help me.

thats all i can think of now. i would probably choose ucsd for its name (rank, research)...its a much better school than uci. but if i wanted to be chill, ide prolly go to uci.
 
You might want to PM these guys.
They all interviewed at both places. Some were accepted to both, some were waitlisted, but they all saw both places and might be able to help you out.

x EraserHead (I think he chose ucsd over uci, the rest, I don't know)
stressedout
envelope
x Mikeyboy
Harps
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Check out the UCSD Class of 2008 thread, there is a lot of discussion about this question.

I'm just hoping to get into one or the other, but UCSD would be my choice. Based on what I've heard from friends at both schools, your thoughts are right. UCSD would be my choice because of its relationship with its top-notch bioengineering program, and that's about it. Otherwise it'd be UCI because of its relaxed attitude, and I feel that I could do better on boards and spend more time doing other stuff to improve my chances at residency. Plus I think that there are more clinical options at UCI (Newport, Irvine, Santa Ana...I know they are far away, but driving isn't an issue there).

I know it's just one case, but my tour guide at UCSD had just gone through match and wasn't very happy, whereas everyone at UCI seemed happy. The first year students were all taking tests at UCSD when I interviewed. San Diego seems a little more urban, but not much, and I grew up in OC and really like it. Might get boring, but LA isn't too far away, and neither is San Diego.

With that said, I'd like to hear some other's thoughts as well, thought I'm committed to going to SD if they take me (I guess I can always just withdraw if I want to go to UCI instead and they take me first).
 
good point...uci is in between la and sd. thats good!
 
Yeah definitely. It's great to be able to drive an hour or so either way, I always made trips to UCLA and UCSD when I still lived back in OC.
 
tbruin said:
I have been accepted to both uci and ucsd and having a very hard time trying to decide between the two schools by this weekend so i need a lot of help, advice, opinions, or anything else. So I have heard the usual.... ucsd is too competitive, too much classtime, but better ranking, better name, and it's in San Diego. UCI students are "happy", get awesome board scores, and are "happy". Can current uci and ucsd students help me out here? Also, are there others who are making the same decision and having similar problems? What did it come down to for you guys? ..... man struggling and running out of time. 😀

thanks ya'll.

UCSD, hands down! 👍
 
ucsd.
more research opportunities if thats your thang...
but if you are interested in primary care...they are strong there too...
you get to do a research project that will help your residency app look better.
you will be in sd.
ucsd students arent all made up of gunners. the amt of people that are annoying are pretty much the same at all the schools.
better repuation than irvine as well.
 
jlee9531 said:
ucsd.
more research opportunities if thats your thang...
but if you are interested in primary care...they are strong there too...
you get to do a research project that will help your residency app look better.
you will be in sd.
ucsd students arent all made up of gunners. the amt of people that are annoying are pretty much the same at all the schools.
better repuation than irvine as well.

im sold. UCSDDDD!
 
Eraserhead said:
If med schools were magazines, UCSD would be Maxim and UCI would be Betters Homes and Gardens. Nuff said.

That's so messed up, but true...


Keep trash-talking, ok? I'm almost there! I can feel it 🙂
 
Spitting Camel said:
That's so messed up, but true...


Keep trash-talking, ok? I'm almost there! I can feel it 🙂

Sings the Janet Jackson song, "Its all for you" :laugh:
 
I think some of you are idiots for saying ucsd will give the edge for academia.

I have to agree, they have stronger researchers there than most parts of the country. However, the "reputation" of ucsd is not that strong nationwide, even in research. This is only because UCSD is only 30 yrs old. The reputational ranking you are referring is usnews, which has no bearing to most laymen or medical institutions. I dare you venture to the South or East Coast or even Oregon and say, I went to UCSD, they'll respond, what is that? If you mention UC Irvine to anyone out East, they won't even know what or where that is. If you mention Yale, however, that's a different story in any part of the country. In the medical world, even in research, USC, UCD, UCI, and UCSD won't have that much of a difference. How can I prove it? Just compare their matchlist. They will be almost identical. Why? Because that UCSD research strength doesnt carry much weight by reputation. Now, I dare you look up matchlists for UCSF, Stanford, and UCLA. You will see a completely different tier matchlist.

The name game matters a bit on the match and in academia. UCSD will carry that weight for you over Loma Linda or Drew, but not other UCs and USC.
 
Got to go with UCSD but realtively speaking both schools are very similar academically...cbc makes a good point. But I cant see myself choosing the OC over Diego. 😉
 
Members don't see this ad :)
They are two different schools in a ton of ways. I'd say it's a toss up either way, but I would probably go to UCSD over UCI because it's a larger city and I would like the location a lot more.
 
Jalby said:
They are two different schools in a ton of ways. I'd say it's a toss up either way, but I would probably go to UCSD over UCI because it's a larger city and I would like the location a lot more.

Wait so for this person you changed your vote?/## On my thread you said UCI even though I HATE small cities 🙂 Are you just playing devil's advocate now?

cbc- I understand your point about the academia thing. There are more research opportunities at UCSD though which is important for resume building. While the clinical opportunities for hands-on work may be somewhat better at UCI, IMO the differences are negligable and it seems that if you seek out the experience at UCSD (sign up for electives with clinical relevance, do your ISP on something involving patients) you can get just as much clinical experience just as early.
 
Eraserhead, PM me and I will show you the light. UCSD is HORRIBLE and you will NOT match better coming from there. Again, PM me.
 
JR said:
Eraserhead, PM me and I will show you the light. UCSD is HORRIBLE and you will NOT match better coming from there. Again, PM me.

Let us all know your opinion. Post on here too. Thanks, snowbear.
 
from someone who was considering ucsd over hms and a few other schools, i'd say go with ucsd for sure.

yes, i know there are a lot of lecture hours but that's pretty much the only negative i really see.

if you want to do academic medicine, the research opportunities will be helpful.

if you want to do primary care, ucsd has a great program for that.

if you want to work with the underserved, you have really great free clinics available for you to work in.

also, you live in san diego, which to me is a really great place to be...laid back, ocean near by, beautiful weather, good food, fairly diverse, close to but not in LA if you like the stuff available in LA

i also think overall, you'll have higher caliber students/faculty at SD and this makes a difference. like the advice rackd8ball gave me, you'll be challenged and pushed and hopefully inspired more at SD and ultimately, I think these factors will mold you into a better doctor, and perhaps even a better person.

Now, this is not saying UCI isn't a great school..Also, being a great doc or great person doesn't depend on what school you attend. That being said, there are more opportunities and challenges at SD that foster this professional and personal growth.

all imo
 
WHy is this even a question, SD compared to Irvine is like comparing a surgeon to a nurse.
 
PeruvianDoctor said:
WHy is this even a question, SD compared to Irvine is like comparing a surgeon to a nurse.
I dunno about you, but I'd probably take the nurse!
 
PeruvianDoctor said:
WHy is this even a question, SD compared to Irvine is like comparing a surgeon to a nurse.

Haha, well I stick to my Maxim versus Better Homes and Gardens assertion. Its mostly about the image in many ways.

UCSD you are going to learn more of the basic science details, this is what I learned from my student host. The physics and the chemistry of things, etc. But that stuff is cool I think.
 
Thank you for your reasonable response.

I understand your point. However, 1) in medical school, you will find very little time doing extensive amount of research, especially UCSD's rigorous curriculum. Unlike during undergrad times, none of my classmates do ANY research as extracurricular activities. There is just not enough time to accomplish anything significant (only multiple pubs as 1st or 2nd authors will really help). 2) even if one does research, is there THAT much difference in quality? For example, would it matter much to your resume whether you did undergrad research for some prof at Boston U compared to prof guy at Columbia? 99% of the time, it wouldn't, and the SAME is in med.

I'm not saying UCSD is a bad place to be, or bagging on it. My main point is, if you choose to go to UCSD over USC or other UCs, know the real reasons why you are choosing this school. The location of San Diego, lots of undergrads nearby, main and VA hospital on campus are all solid reasons for choosing UCSD. Research and reputation are just not really one of them, by the reasons I previously stated.

Eraserhead said:
Wait so for this person you changed your vote?/## On my thread you said UCI even though I HATE small cities 🙂 Are you just playing devil's advocate now?

cbc- I understand your point about the academia thing. There are more research opportunities at UCSD though which is important for resume building. While the clinical opportunities for hands-on work may be somewhat better at UCI, IMO the differences are negligable and it seems that if you seek out the experience at UCSD (sign up for electives with clinical relevance, do your ISP on something involving patients) you can get just as much clinical experience just as early.
 
Well I can't say I disagree with you. I really don't understand 100% of what medical school is like as I haven't started it yet. UCSD's curriculum itself is more research based though, and emphasizes the basic sciences more than UCI's. That is a fact... so if someone is interested in research that alone should be another factor in the decision. Especially if someone is looking at something like bioengineering like one poster mentioned. That being said, if you don't care about this stuff, you can still get through, pass your classes, not worry about every little detail, and do your primary care residency in CA if that's what you want, and in that case things like the location, on campus medical facilities, financial aid, gut feeling, etc. should be the deciding factors not the rankings/ research opportunities I suppose.

I don't know, I woke up with some second thoughts today and another "UCSD is horrible" story, but no actual students have given me those stories, so I'm still hesitant to take them seriously. It seems like alot of people are just trying to justify their decisions to turn down UCSD after the fact and I don't see why anyone should care. Also, I was really disappointed with UCI's financial aid (you can call and ask what you are getting) so that made my final decision a bit easier to make.

cbc said:
Thank you for your reasonable response.

I understand your point. However, 1) in medical school, you will find very little time doing extensive amount of research, especially UCSD's rigorous curriculum. Unlike during undergrad times, none of my classmates do ANY research as extracurricular activities. There is just not enough time to accomplish anything significant (only multiple pubs as 1st or 2nd authors will really help). 2) even if one does research, is there THAT much difference in I'm not saying UCSD is a bad place to be, or bagging on it. My main point is, if you choose to go to UCSD over USC or other UCs, know the real reasons why you are choosing this school. The location of San Diego, lots of quality? For example, would it matter much to your resume whether you did undergrad research for some prof at Boston U compared to prof guy at Columbia? 99% of the time, it wouldn't, and the SAME is in med.

undergrads nearby, main and VA hospital on campus are all solid reasons for choosing UCSD. Research and reputation are just not really one of them, by the reasons I previously stated.
 
Eraserhead said:
I'm withdrawing from IRVINE today. Go get 'em SpittingCamel!


OMG, the day has finally come!!!! Thanks for putting up with me! I know I've been unbearable!!


slips knee-pads on... :laugh:
 
No one is trying to convince you or anybody to attend UCI or drop UCSD. Like I said, there are many good reasons one chooses UCSD over UCI or any UC, but my point is research is not one of them.

I attended an undergrad that mostly emphasizes the teaching of the fundamental sciences and research. 4 years in the classroom memorizing pathways and mechanisms, but throw me in a lab, I wouldnt know how to do anything. The same thing will happen in med school, no matter how research oriented a school is. The only way to learn basic sci research is to do it, and for a long time. That is why graduate school is 5 years, mostly lab work instead of lecture.

2 years of basic science in medical school lecture, no matter how research oriented, will not prepare you adequately for independent research unless you take 1 or more years off (1 is probably not enough). In that case, you can attend any school and take time off to do the research wherever you want (jhu, NIH, UCSF, Switzerland, etc). UCSD is a great school at a great location and price, but choose it because you really know why. I highly disagree basic science research is a good reason.

Eraserhead said:
Well I can't say I disagree with you. I really don't understand 100% of what medical school is like as I haven't started it yet. UCSD's curriculum itself is more research based though, and emphasizes the basic sciences more than UCI's. That is a fact... so if someone is interested in research that alone should be another factor in the decision. Especially if someone is looking at something like bioengineering like one poster mentioned. That being said, if you don't care about this stuff, you can still get through, pass your classes, not worry about every little detail, and do your primary care residency in CA if that's what you want, and in that case things like the location, on campus medical facilities, financial aid, gut feeling, etc. should be the deciding factors not the rankings/ research opportunities I suppose.

I don't know, I woke up with some second thoughts today and another "UCSD is horrible" story, but no actual students have given me those stories, so I'm still hesitant to take them seriously. It seems like alot of people are just trying to justify their decisions to turn down UCSD after the fact and I don't see why anyone should care. Also, I was really disappointed with UCI's financial aid (you can call and ask what you are getting) so that made my final decision a bit easier to make.
 
Eraserhead said:
Haha, well I stick to my Maxim versus Better Homes and Gardens assertion. Its mostly about the image in many ways.

UCSD you are going to learn more of the basic science details, this is what I learned from my student host. The physics and the chemistry of things, etc. But that stuff is cool I think.

As a gardener, I should give props to the Anteaters.
 
First of all, thanks everyone for your thoughts. These forums are really helpful and I've become a believer.

I posted this thread because I've heard so many bad things about UCSD, I wanted to know whether the rumors are true. I have friends in Irvine and know I will be comfortable and happy there, whereas in UCSD I don't really know anybody and the school is stressful from what I hear. I grew up in LA and went to UCLA so I know that SD is a better school slightly (I don't care about research) and is a better place to live. All I hear from my med school friends is that being happy is the most important thing, and I wonder if I could get that at SD with all the crap they put you through. Any more thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
 
tbruin said:
First of all, thanks everyone for your thoughts. These forums are really helpful and I've become a believer.

I posted this thread because I've heard so many bad things about UCSD, I wanted to know whether the rumors are true. I have friends in Irvine and know I will be comfortable and happy there, whereas in UCSD I don't really know anybody and the school is stressful from what I hear. I grew up in LA and went to UCLA so I know that SD is a better school slightly (I don't care about research) and is a better place to live. All I hear from my med school friends is that being happy is the most important thing, and I wonder if I could get that at SD with all the crap they put you through. Any more thoughts would be greatly appreciated.


I think that while it's been covered, the rumors used to be true many many years ago. I heard the rumor about Saturday class last year and they stopped that a long time ago. Bottom line" the person YOU are will dictate whether you are happy or sad. If you're a miserable person, you'll be miserable in paradise. Don't think a school will be the reason you are happy... it has to be your attitude, buddy.
 
cbc said, "I attended an undergrad that mostly emphasizes the teaching of the fundamental sciences and research. 4 years in the classroom memorizing pathways and mechanisms, but throw me in a lab, I wouldnt know how to do anything. The same thing will happen in med school, no matter how research oriented a school is. The only way to learn basic sci research is to do it, and for a long time. That is why graduate school is 5 years, mostly lab work instead of lecture."

I think that this is very well said!

People, including myself in the past, always seem to sometimes fixate on reasons why one school is better than another when making their decisions, when the reasons ultimately aren't true. I urge you to look at things like early exposure to real pt and not actors to interview and examine, clerkship experiences, electives, 4th year travel grants/research grants, match list, etc - rather than focusing on how many G protein pathways you'll learn in your first two years. There is a lot to learn in medical school. There is a ton of information that is absolutely necessary you understand if you are to correctly manage complex situations successfully. If you want to focus on research, talk to a professor and get started in their lab. I wouldn't worry about getting it in the classroom. Believe me. There is enough medicine to learn.

For me, I was grateful that UCSF cut out a lot of extraneous, low-clinical-yield information. I've heard horror stories about some programs and how most lecturers are PhD's that spend half the lecture describing all of their research and then test you on it. Not the clinically relevant sort of curriculum that I would desire. You have to study all the basic sciences again when boards come around anyway.

I don't know much about either program so I won't try and tell you about them. I would try to talk with some 4th years at both programs (you should be able to get some emails from the student affairs office, adcom, etc) and ask them about their clinical years, experience, support, etc. If you talk to most M1s, they'll all say how great things are, how great the library is etc - and that is true. The first year is exciting, new, and many MS1s love talking to applicants b/c it shows them how far they have come themselves. Applicants are the worst people to talk to b/c most of the information you are going to get is he said/she said kind of stuff. Get what I'm saying? 4th years have been through it all and have the best insight into the school.

Best of luck. Both options are great choices! Just go where you will be the most comfortable as well as gain exposure to those things you feel are necessary to pursue your goals.
 
Doesn't matter. You'll be a superstar wherever you go. Good luck! 😛
 
UCI is very much teaching towards the boards for the first two years. They have self exams for all tests, and I think it would be very effective for the boards.
 
Jalby said:
UCI is very much teaching towards the boards for the first two years. They have self exams for all tests, and I think it would be very effective for the boards.

I'll admit that I was trying to ignore this before, but UCI does have a better match list than UCSD if you are looking at competitive specialties in CA.

2 months to prepare for the boards sounds better than 13 days at SD.

I'm eating all my words, this is so great!
 
Eraserhead said:
Also, I was really disappointed with UCI's financial aid (you can call and ask what you are getting) so that made my final decision a bit easier to make.

When did you call and who did you talk to to find out about financial aid? I tried calling but they said that they will call me back, but it might take a while 🙁

I got offered housing too (even though I didn't win the lottery), so if the financial aid package looks good then that might cinch it for me. Argh.... count down to May 15....
 
1150829 said:
When did you call and who did you talk to to find out about financial aid? I tried calling but they said that they will call me back, but it might take a while 🙁

I got offered housing too (even though I didn't win the lottery), so if the financial aid package looks good then that might cinch it for me. Argh.... count down to May 15....

I just talked to whoever answers the phone (?) Female.

What are your other choices?
 
If med schools were magazines, UCSD would be Maxim and UCI would be Betters Homes and Gardens. Nuff said

I don't know if I would hold on to this analogy. I have plenty of friends who went to UCSD for undergrad, and they don't describe anything like Maxim. I also have a friend who is an MD/PhD at UCSD, and she regularly rolls her eyes at her "gunner classmates." From what I hear, UCSD deserves its reputation as being more cutthroat. Then again, she also talks about a contingent that hits the waves right after class lets out. So it's probably not a horror story, but I don't think it's something to ignore.

Going on a gut instinct, I'd choose UCSD, simply because I think La Jolla is one of the most gorgeous spots on earth (that may be the wrong reason to choose a school, especially one so near to places like Crystal Cove, Laguna, and Dana Point). I guess I might have to think about that a while longer, though. I really like souljah1's post, though be forewarned that I've just begun looking at all of this myself.
 
freaker said:
I don't know if I would hold on to this analogy. I have plenty of friends who went to UCSD for undergrad, and they don't describe anything like Maxim. I also have a friend who is an MD/PhD at UCSD, and she regularly rolls her eyes at her "gunner classmates." From what I hear, UCSD deserves its reputation as being more cutthroat. Then again, she also talks about a contingent that hits the waves right after class lets out. So it's probably not a horror story, but I don't think it's something to ignore.

Going on a gut instinct, I'd choose UCSD, simply because I think La Jolla is one of the most gorgeous spots on earth (that may be the wrong reason to choose a school, especially one so near to places like Crystal Cove, Laguna, and Dana Point). I guess I might have to think about that a while longer, though. I really like souljah1's post, though be forewarned that I've just begun looking at all of this myself.


OK i'm just being funny. 😀
 
One thing I noted today though... no one who is finishing at UCI matched in San Diego...

More people who go to San Diego matched in San Diego than not San Diego...
 
Eraserhead said:
I just talked to whoever answers the phone (?) Female.

What are your other choices?


Ooo... someone just called me back. It looks like I'm getting the $6K in grants and the rest in loans. I was hoping for a little bit more, but I guess it's better than nothing. Right now I have to decide between USC and UCI, but I'm waitlisted at UCSF and still haven't heard post-interview from UCLA (withdrew from the rest). I haven't heard anything from the USC financial aid office either, but hopefully they'll respond before may 15 and help make my decision (somewhat) easier.
 
1150829 said:
Ooo... someone just called me back. It looks like I'm getting the $6K in grants and the rest in loans. I was hoping for a little bit more, but I guess it's better than nothing. Right now I have to decide between USC and UCI, but I'm waitlisted at UCSF and still haven't heard post-interview from UCLA (withdrew from the rest). I haven't heard anything from the USC financial aid office either, but hopefully they'll respond before may 15 and help make my decision (somewhat) easier.

6K is the maximum grant. Its good!!
 
1150829 said:
Ooo... someone just called me back. It looks like I'm getting the $6K in grants and the rest in loans. I was hoping for a little bit more, but I guess it's better than nothing. Right now I have to decide between USC and UCI, but I'm waitlisted at UCSF and still haven't heard post-interview from UCLA (withdrew from the rest). I haven't heard anything from the USC financial aid office either, but hopefully they'll respond before may 15 and help make my decision (somewhat) easier.

Let us know which one you choose, k? Thanks! Congrats on the choice!! :clap:
 
Eraserhead, ultimately, Spitting Camel is right. You are what make you happy and successful.

Like I said, USC, UCI, UCD, and UCSD have the same tier matchlists. The only difference is that more medical student from each school will preferentially attend their own institution's residency (mostly because residency programs and medical students prefer each other). I want to emphasize that every medical school, anatomy course, USMLE, clerkship will be stressful and difficult. All pre-clerkship clinical experience or research is baloney unless you take years off to do it. I personally think it's bullcrap that on interview day you have to justify to the interviewer why you want to attend that school, because the difference won't be THAT much unless we are speaking East Coast vs West Coast or UCSF vs Univ Alabama.

Choosing medical school is like choosing undergrad. If a high school senior comes with the question, I am premed and choosing between UCI or UCSD, which should I pick? You'd say something like, UCSD is a bit more cutthroat, there is more biomed research there and more students there get into medical school, but ultimately it will depend on YOU to get into medical school. The same answer applies to picking medical school (except med school gives you less time to do research). Your success will be based mostly on YOU, not the school.

And yes, souljah is correct. If you want insight, ask 4th yrs, or heck, ask residents who attended those medical schools. Would the best advice for picking college come from freshman/sophomore, seniors, or students from professional schools? The higher up you go, the more wise the response you receive.

Eraserhead said:
I'll admit that I was trying to ignore this before, but UCI does have a better match list than UCSD if you are looking at competitive specialties in CA.

2 months to prepare for the boards sounds better than 13 days at SD.

I'm eating all my words, this is so great!
 
cbc said:
Eraserhead, ultimately, Spitting Camel is right. You are what make you happy and successful.

Like I said, USC, UCI, UCD, and UCSD have the same tier matchlists. The only difference is that more medical student from each school will preferentially attend their own institution's residency (mostly because residency programs and medical students prefer each other). I want to emphasize that every medical school, anatomy course, USMLE, clerkship will be stressful and difficult. All pre-clerkship clinical experience or research is baloney unless you take years off to do it. I personally think it's bullcrap that on interview day you have to justify to the interviewer why you want to attend that school, because the difference won't be THAT much unless we are speaking East Coast vs West Coast or UCSF vs Univ Alabama.

Choosing medical school is like choosing undergrad. If a high school senior comes with the question, I am premed and choosing between UCI or UCSD, which should I pick? You'd say something like, UCSD is a bit more cutthroat, there is more biomed research there and more students there get into medical school, but ultimately it will depend on YOU to get into medical school. The same answer applies to picking medical school (except med school gives you less time to do research). Your success will be based mostly on YOU, not the school.

And yes, souljah is correct. If you want insight, ask 4th yrs, or heck, ask residents who attended those medical schools. Would the best advice for picking college come from freshman/sophomore, seniors, or students from professional schools? The higher up you go, the more wise the response you receive.

cbc, I agree with your post with one caveat. The higher up you go, the farther back their experience was. If you ask residents about their medical school experiences many things (curriculum, hospital affiliations, administration, etc.) could have changed in the meantime. But overall, you're right: they've experienced it, so they can relate.
 
TongueInCheek said:
cbc, I agree with your post with one caveat. The higher up you go, the farther back their experience was. If you ask residents about their medical school experiences many things (curriculum, hospital affiliations, administration, etc.) could have changed in the meantime. But overall, you're right: they've experienced it, so they can relate.

That's true. I get the feeling that not much changes at UCSD each year. Everyone mentions changes but I have yet to have any cited.
 
Also, when did UC San Diego start having a reputation for having cutthroat pre-meds? Are they clustered in any particular college at UCSD?
 
TongueInCheek said:
Also, when did UC San Diego start having a reputation for having cutthroat pre-meds? Are they clustered in any particular college at UCSD?

I'm sure its nothing like Cal.
 
I meant as compared to junior college, cal state, UC riverside, or perhaps even UCI. Noticed I said "a bit" more cutthroat. Besides, I said that as a hypothetical example of a response, not my own personal opinion.

TongueInCheek said:
Also, when did UC San Diego start having a reputation for having cutthroat pre-meds? Are they clustered in any particular college at UCSD?
 
tbruin... where did you decide to go???????????? Today's the magic day.

P.S SDN should get a new smiley that looks sad with puppy dog eyes. I would use that one a lot! :laugh:
 
TongueInCheek said:
Also, when did UC San Diego start having a reputation for having cutthroat pre-meds? Are they clustered in any particular college at UCSD?

Some organization used to publish the schools and stats of UCSD students accepted into med school.
From what I remembered UCSD students clustered at UCSD 😱,
USC and UCI. There were more schools on the east coast, but U can't remember exactly.
 
Top