phobie said:
hey guys, i was wondering if anyone knew anything about extension courses and how the med school admission committees view them. i've heard that getting straight A's at a community college is obviously viewed differently than getting straight A's at say, ucla (not extension.) so, do you think that they also view ucla extension courses as sub-par?
i know that there are concurrent enrollment classes (where you take the actual undergrad classes with ucla students) and the extension courses (taught usually by non-ucla profs). do any of you guys know if taking either is better or worse? or if there's even a distinction at all on the extension transcript?
i can't afford to go somewhere like usc post-bacc or scripps, so ucla extension seems to be the best option for me, esp since i live two miles from there. anyways, any input would be greatly appreciated!
Well for one community college classes are not upper division, so if you are doing this as a post-bacc, then that doesn't work anyway.
Anyway, in regards to UC Extension, Extension is usually considered a seperate entity from its respective school..like a seperate college. Therefore grades are processed there, and are printed out on UC Extension transcripts paper. There are two types of UC Extension classes, which you have already stated.
1) Extension: which are taken at the Extension itself, and usually taught by Extension faculty. (however I have seen 1 Extension faculty teach in a UC Davis class)
2) Open Campus: this is processed by Extension, but you take classes at the respective UC. In the case of UCLA, you would go to the UCLA campus, take a form in and have the professor sign it off. You turn it into the Extension office where they register you for the class. You are also last priority to register, so a freshman who started in the fall will get the class before you. Lastly, it sometimes takes longer to register for a class, and thus your online capabilities may be hindered (e.g.: delayed access to online course resources, and email lists).
Both methods result in grades through UC Extension, not at the UC campus. In my opinion, UC Extension classes are probably not considered sub-par, however the variety of classes may prevent you from taking enough classes. Only the Open Campus program can provide you with numerous courses to take since they are the same classes offered to UCLA undergrads. However this is very expensive. When I last did open campus, I was paying around $400-500 per 3 unit class. When I went to full-time (12 units), I was paying around $2000 per quarter which is a lot more than any undergrad. You may also have a unit limit. I believe we had an 8 unit registration limit, which needs to be petitioned each quarter.
So in summary, yes there is differentiation between UC Extension vs. normal UC classes. I don't think UC Extension classes are sub-par, but I have never taken them. Speaking to our director of admission at UCD, he saw NO problem with taking UCD classes through the
open campus program since they were the same classes. He did not address Extension classes. The cost of the open campus was very high and in my opinion, the hassle was not worth it (signing up for classes). However I did manage to fund 1.5 years worth of open campus. Regardless, I ultimately went off to grad school at UCD since its free, and I can take undergrad classes once I'm done with my core requirements.