At about this time last year, i was deciding between UCSF and UCLA. As an outsider, I felt that the schools were more similar than different, and based my decision on location, and where i felt more comfortable. However, as a student at UCSF, I now see how incredibly unique my school is, as i'm sure UCLA is as well. I have a couple friends at UCLA, and they agreed that the P/F system doesn't really eliminate competition because of the High Pass thing. Our curriculum is a little different (they take classes in a different order than us), and clinical exposure is different too. We get our first experience in clinic during our first quarter, doing exams on each other, taking impressions, perio probing, prophy cleanings, etc. I'm not sure when UCLA starts their clinical experience. But overall, both are excellent schools. I do believe that UCLA gets more people into specialty programs, so if you are looking to specialize, that may be an important factor to consider. For me, location was the deciding factor, as I am from norther california. I have no regrets, and do not feel that it is a "living hell" here. True, the classes are difficult, but I think you will find the same amount of difficulty at UCLA. I like my classmates, my professors, the campus, and WE DO HAVE TIME FOR A SOCIAL LIFE!!! good luck, hope i added some insight!!