- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 30
Hey all, I've had the unbelievable fortune to be accepted to a few medical schools this cycle, but UCSF and HMS are without a doubt my top choices, and I genuinely cannot make the decision myself. So here goes the breakdown.
UCSF
Pros
Cons
Harvard
Pros
Cons
Summary: Just skim the bullet points. I guess the main problems are the unknown unknowns that I should be considering. Is the difference between UCSF and HMS even a big deal at all? Am I ascribing too much value to HMS's power in the academic world? Its extremely tough.
UCSF
Pros
- I love the weather, SF Culture is probably more of a fit (although I've only been to Boston for the interview and liked it)
- My long term SO (4.5 years) loves it there much more than I do, and I love her.
- Her family is nearby, and they have been an important support system for us both
- I like UCSF's mission, and coming from a very poor background in the deep south lets me connect consistently with the roots of what pushed me to medicine in the first place.
- Clinical Education is #1 by far
- Full P/F completely unranked all 4 years
- When there is down time, there is a greater diversity of activities to fill my time and indulge in hobbies.
Cons
- Extremely Expensive, I have essentially no money and my family has no wealth, so everything that will be paid, will come from financial aid and loans. (I haven't seen UCSF's aid yet, but I know it wont beat HMS)
- I know I will want to do residency at UCSF/Stanford, but I want the experience of living on the east coast for a while, and to understand that regional culture.
- While their research is amazing, the only place that is better is HMS, and HMS has some specific labs that deeply interest me that UCSF does not.
- I haven't heard much positive about new bridges curriculum
Harvard
Pros
- I will receive full financial aid plus a REACH scholarship, which should cover most things from full tuition to a portion of COL, and Boston has a lower COL than SF, so I could live better, for less.
- The prestige is cool, and while its not a really motivating factor, me going to Harvard means a whole lot more to the people in my neighborhood as well as my sister and family than UCSF.
- They have longer dedicated Step study time, which is DEFINITELY important, and likely a major factor in how their Step average is crazy high when compared to UCSF
- More research opportunities in areas that I am specifically interested in, although I will probably take on work in a new field as well.
- I want to be an academic for the rest of my life, and I have heard that going to HMS will do you quite a lot of favors if academia is your goal in the long run.
- A place that is totally new and different excites me (could be a con idk)
- I liked the pathways curriculum quite a bit.
Cons
- I've never dealt with real cold, so Boston's winter weather is not exactly exciting to me
- My SO has a negative opinion of Boston, and I can't imagine going through this journey without her, although she may join me if I decide on HMS.
- My SO wants to work in product dev, and I'm not sure if there are nearly as many opportunities there for her as there are in the Bay area.
Summary: Just skim the bullet points. I guess the main problems are the unknown unknowns that I should be considering. Is the difference between UCSF and HMS even a big deal at all? Am I ascribing too much value to HMS's power in the academic world? Its extremely tough.