- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 16
I've been struggling to decide between UCSF and UCSD for the last couple of weeks. I'm so glad I have these two options, but without in-person Second Look events, I can't get as good of a feel of where I can see myself being the most happy as it would be with an in-person visit. I'm an underrepresented, non-traditional student from a small town in New Mexico and I really care for a learning environment that is diverse (in every sense from racial, socioeconomic, personal interests, etc.), close-knit, and provides unique research experiences as well as clinical experiences with underserved, vulnerable populations. I also prioritize learning from faculty and learning with classmates that are passionate about reducing health disparities, as that's my main motivation for choosing to enter the field of medicine.
I'm currently interested in internal medicine and pediatrics and maybe going into an oncology fellowship afterward. I would also like to work as a clinician investigator involved in cancer research (both basic and clinical research).
UCSF
Expected COA for 4 years ~170K (after need-based grant)
Pros
UCSD
Expected COA for 4 years ~140K (after need-based grant)
Pros
Your honest input and advice on my choice at hand would be greatly appreciated.
I'm currently interested in internal medicine and pediatrics and maybe going into an oncology fellowship afterward. I would also like to work as a clinician investigator involved in cancer research (both basic and clinical research).
UCSF
Expected COA for 4 years ~170K (after need-based grant)
Pros
- 1.5 years pre-clinical curriculum
- Prestige in medicine and connections for residency
- Availability of funding for research experiences and global health opportunities
- Enjoyed interview day and I was pleasantly surprised to be contacted post-acceptance by both interviewers and other current medical students
- San Francisco seems like a nice city with good weather (although a bit cooler than I'm used to)
- Multiple clinical training sites throughout the city and Bay area
- True P/F for both pre-clinical and clerkships and focus on clinical problem solving rather than on teaching to the STEP 1 exam during pre-clinical curriculum (a bigger pro now that STEP 1 is becoming P/F)
- Student diversity seems to be quite high compared to other T20 medical schools
- Highly ranked in primary care as well
- Long-term serving school of medicine leadership and staff
- Housing is expensive, even on-campus housing, which is currently only guaranteed for 2 years.
- Most on-campus housing is a 30-minute shuttle ride from the main campus where the pre-clinical curriculum is largely taught (although shuttle is free)
- Parking is scarce and expensive. I'd probably forgo keeping my car, which would be inconvenient for groceries, road trips, etc.
- Longer distance from home
UCSD
Expected COA for 4 years ~140K (after need-based grant)
Pros
- Closer to home (10 hours versus 15 hours)
- Very large Free Clinic
- Near border with Mexico with a free clinic opportunity in Tijuana, MX.
- Since I live near the US-Mexico border and my intentions are to practice in this region of the country after training, it would be a great learning experience to study medicine in a different city near the US-Mexico border that I'm not familiar with.
- Many new graduate housing buildings and very reasonably priced and within walking distance to both the school and clinical training sites.
- Extensive and free car parking
- Warm and sunny weather year-round
- Opportunities available from being located and connected to an undergraduate campus
- Facilities (academic, research, and clinical) are very nice and modern
- Relatives in the area
- Not as prestigious in medicine as UCSF
- Recent changes in school of medicine leadership
- Student body does not seem to be as diverse
Your honest input and advice on my choice at hand would be greatly appreciated.