Hi everybody,
I am interviewing for 2008 residency in Pathology. I've had a good lineup so far, and UT at Houston and U of Wisconsin are at the top of my list. I'm having trouble deciding which to rank first.
Madison pros: I liked the city a lot; it would be a tad better for my husband; the program is small and my perception was that the residents are well taken care of.
Houston pros: residents do rotations and take electives at M.D. Anderson, which is #1 in cancer research, a field I'm very interested in. But I didn't like the city that much.
The question is, is the quality of resident training in UT Houston significantly better than that in UW Madison? If the programs are about as good, I'd choose Madison. If UT is much better, I'll forgo Madison and put Houston at the top of my list.
Any information is welcome. Thank you!
I am interviewing for 2008 residency in Pathology. I've had a good lineup so far, and UT at Houston and U of Wisconsin are at the top of my list. I'm having trouble deciding which to rank first.
Madison pros: I liked the city a lot; it would be a tad better for my husband; the program is small and my perception was that the residents are well taken care of.
Houston pros: residents do rotations and take electives at M.D. Anderson, which is #1 in cancer research, a field I'm very interested in. But I didn't like the city that much.
The question is, is the quality of resident training in UT Houston significantly better than that in UW Madison? If the programs are about as good, I'd choose Madison. If UT is much better, I'll forgo Madison and put Houston at the top of my list.
Any information is welcome. Thank you!