UT to rebuild UTMB

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

lowbudget

Full Member
7+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2003
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
34
Regents resolve to rebuild UTMB on the island

By Laura Elder
The Daily News
Published March 11, 2009

GALVESTON — Delivering some of the most promising news to the island since Hurricane Ike, the University of Texas System Board of Regents agreed Tuesday to work with the medical branch to restore the storm-damaged John Sealy Hospital, reopen a trauma center and build a new surgical tower — all in Galveston.

Regents, won over by a unified effort by residents and stakeholders to keep the hospital on the island, tossed aside a controversial recommendation by consultants to move most of the University of Texas Medical Branch’s hospital and clinical enterprises to League City.

News that regents essentially adopted what is now being dubbed the “Eiland plan” — named for state Rep. Craig Eiland, D-Galveston — sparked widespread rejoicing on an island still staggering from Hurricane Ike, which stuck Sept. 13, badly damaging John Sealy Hospital.

With the medical branch’s main source of income down, regents in November approved layoffs of thousands of employees and hardened many islanders’ suspicion that the board was indifferent to the Galveston institution.

In resolving to support a clinical strategy on the island, the regents rejected a recommendation issued last month by consultant Kurt Salmon Associates arguing the most economically viable plan for the medical branch was to move most hospital services to League City.

While the island mood was celebratory Tuesday, there was much work to do, officials cautioned.

‘Committed To UTMB’

Regents, who have also been criticized by some influential lawmakers for not fighting hard enough in seeking state support for the battered medical branch before approving job cuts, agreed to rebuild clinical operations on the island.

But although the UT System board, which governs nine universities and six health institutions, has clout in the Legislature, it can’t by itself wrangle funding for restoration of John Sealy Hospital and a new surgical tower.

“The board of regents and the UT System remain committed to

UTMB’s future,” said board Chairman H. Scott Caven Jr.

“The board cannot accomplish the ultimate goal of sustaining UTMB’s future alone, and it is important to note the shared responsibility that must exist with the board; the Legislature, local and federal offices; and the philanthropic community; and the necessity for a reliable, long-term source of operating funds from these extramural sources.”

528 beds

Financing the renovations and storm-hardening of the former 550-bed John Sealy Hospital won’t come without obstacles nor will it be immediate, officials say.

It could take five years and $266 million to get all of the 214 beds for the general public and another 100 for Texas Department of Criminal Justice inmates, who the medical branch treats through a state contract, officials said.

The surgical tower, which would provide another 214 modern rooms in which to teach medical students, would cost $438 million to build — about $2 million per bed — and also depends on financial commitments from state and federal governments and philanthropic organizations.

To get to 528 beds, the surgical tower is necessary. Storm surge swamped the first floor of John Sealy, knocking out the blood bank, pharmacy and other services. Renovating calls for moving services to higher floors, leaving less room for beds.

Restoring Trauma Services

The medical branch plans to restore trauma services at John Sealy in late June or early July.

But the new surgical tower, which could take several years to develop, would include a trauma center. Eventually, the medical branch intends to reopen a Level 1 trauma center, the highest designation, because all surgical specialties are on call, said medical branch President Dr. David Callender.

The island’s elite trauma center has been closed since the storm, an issue worrisome to locals and posing a burden to Houston trauma centers, which are seeing an increase of patients. But immediate medical branch plans call for opening a Level 2 or 3 trauma center.

“It’s hard for me to promise a Level 1 trauma center in a certain amount of time,” Callender said.

Plans also call for a commitment by local governments to help create a steady source of revenue, including the creation of hospital district that would tax residents, a prospect that won’t be an easy sell.

But Eiland, who some island residents were praising Tuesday, said the first hurdle would be securing state funding.

‘Definitely A Victory’

“I think it was definitely a victory,” Eiland said. “But obviously, if the Legislature doesn’t fund the plan, we’re back to square one. I’ll be happy in May to get funding for the construction and operations, which is the key to the plan laid out and the regents’ resolution.”

Convincing island or county residents to support hospital district would take a concerted effort.

“Let’s not worry about that until June,” said Eiland, who, as speaker pro tempore, is in the second highest leadership post in the Texas House.

The plans hinge on coming up with anywhere from $60 million to $100 million a year in new operating revenue from federal, state and local sources. That amount would give the medical branch a 1 percent operating margin — that is, put its revenues about 1 percent ahead of expenses, which is about half the margin a well funded not-for-profit hospital would have.

State Match

Funding the plan requires lawmakers to match federal dollars, and to also hold the medical branch harmless in the general revenue appropriations, an infusion of $140 million. In other words, lawmakers wouldn’t punish the medical branch by cutting funding for services stopped after the hurricane.

Eiland said he also hopes lawmakers approve a funding formula for John Sealy Hospital, which has reopened in a diminished capacity, that would help pay for indigent care. State support for indigent care at the island institution has dwindled as medical inflation has risen.

Also to help fund Eiland’s plan, lawmakers would have to allow the medical branch to keep the $90 million it earns in the federal Disproportionate Share Hospital Program, but which the state currently keeps.

On Feb. 20, four regents, part of a special task force, traveled to the island for a public hearing about the Kurt Salmon Report and the medical branch’s future. About 600 people attended the three-hour public hearing, marking a rare show of unity in their disdain for the consultant’s report.

‘Incredibly Supportive’

Task force members Tuesday told the full board they were impressed by the support for the medical branch — both by thoughtful pleas and in numbers.

Some members of the task force also expressed surprise by how much local financial support organizations offer the medical branch, particularly the 87-year-old Sealy & Smith Foundation, which has given the island hospital more than $600 million since its inception. The foundation’s charter require that it fund hospital initiatives on the island.

The regents’ decision to move ahead with restoration of John Sealy hospital and a new surgical tower marked one of brightest days for the island institution since the storm, Callender said.

“They were incredibly supportive of UTMB,” Callender said. “Everyone has worked so hard.”

+++

FEMA Support: $599.2 Million Net Of Insurance

($ millions); Cumulative FY10-FY19

John Sealy modernization/repairs (214 beds); $ (266.0)

Sealy & Smith Foundation; 77.0

FEMA reimbursement; 130.0

FEMA state match; 46.0

State capital support; 9.0

Other donors; 4.0

Jennie Sealy replacement (214 beds); (438.0)

Sealy & Smith Foundation; 75.0

State capital support; 141.0

UTMB debt; 172.0

TDCJ Hosp. mitigation/repairs (100 beds); (1.0)

UTMB debt; 1.0

Trauma Ctr. Equip. mitigation/repairs; (8.0)

FEMA reimbursement; 8.0

Other FEMA capital expenditures; (483.0)

Other FEMA reimbursement; 311.4

Other FEMA proceeds (state match); 103.8

Insurance proceeds ($67.8 rec’d. in FY09); --

Other projected capital expenditures; (1,008.7)

Net cash flows from (for) capital; $ (1,126.5)

SOURCE: University of Texas System Board of Regents
 
Good for them...but I hope the patients/population comes back.

And hopefully this series of bad hurricane seasons we've been having is a fluke and not the way things are going to be until human waste and environmental destruction ultimately wipe us out. Wall-E!!!!
 
Well, it seems that the Regents bowed to political desires; and they ignored every single recommendation to move to the mainland. Oh, well.
 
Assuming that they get through all the funding hurdles and get it all rebuilt, what happens with the next big storm? Will they evacuate all the patients, or is the plan to harden the place enough to withstand the storm? Would family members stay with their loved ones? If not, the repeated evac costs are going to be enormous.

Even if hardened, not sure how you mitigate against the first two floors being inundated with seawater. Unless they build the whole thing on stilts?
 
Assuming that they get through all the funding hurdles and get it all rebuilt, what happens with the next big storm? Will they evacuate all the patients, or is the plan to harden the place enough to withstand the storm? Would family members stay with their loved ones? If not, the repeated evac costs are going to be enormous.

Even if hardened, not sure how you mitigate against the first two floors being inundated with seawater. Unless they build the whole thing on stilts?

Then why is New Orleans being rebuilt?
 
I think "rebuilt" is too strong a word for what's going on there. More like: halfheartedly glued together with bubble gum and tape, with Mardi Gras beads around the outside like a rubber-band.


Edit: I take back the half-hearted part.
 
Great, am I going to have to pay for it? Just so that a bunch of 300 pound dip****s in cowboy hats can go around bragging, "Yeeeah don't mess with Texas! We show dem hurricanes whose boss!" 👎
 
Assuming that they get through all the funding hurdles and get it all rebuilt, what happens with the next big storm? Will they evacuate all the patients, or is the plan to harden the place enough to withstand the storm? Would family members stay with their loved ones? If not, the repeated evac costs are going to be enormous.

Even if hardened, not sure how you mitigate against the first two floors being inundated with seawater. Unless they build the whole thing on stilts?

Actually this is the plan. One of the major problems was that many infrastructure-type facilities were on the first floor of the hospital, e.g. cafeteria, pharmacy, blood bank, emergency generators. Who thought this was a good idea at 8 feet above sea level is beyond me, but that's how it was. Anyway, they are currently in the process of moving most of those facilities to the second floor of the hospital. For the most part, OR's, patient rooms, labs, etc were unaffected by the storm other than the loss of power and ancillary support necessary to run a hospital. So, all this to say that the plan is closer to your proposal than you might think, and also more practical than you might think. The prison hospital attached to UTMB is already back up and running and has been for a while; in addition, there have been many thousands of L&D deliveries since the hurricane.

Great, am I going to have to pay for it? Just so that a bunch of 300 pound dip****s in cowboy hats can go around bragging, "Yeeeah don't mess with Texas! We show dem hurricanes whose boss!" 👎

UTMB is the primary healthcare center for many millions of people in Galveston and south Houston stretching all the way to the Louisiana border. In addition, UTMB has historically provided medical care to indigent patients from all across the state of Texas. Hospitals in the Houston region have been desperately stretched to capacity since the loss of one of the region's major trauma and medical centers. You are an ignorant "dip****," to use your parlance.
 
Great, am I going to have to pay for it? Just so that a bunch of 300 pound dip****s in cowboy hats can go around bragging, "Yeeeah don't mess with Texas! We show dem hurricanes whose boss!" 👎

This person's knowledge of Texas is obviously limited to some cartoon stereotype. As for YOU paying for it? What state do you think shouldered the financial burden for Hurricane Katrina the most? What city took in >100,000 people with literally no resources? And by the way, probably >80% of Texans(myself included) wouldn't describe themselves as "cowboys", but even those you might call "rednecks" still have more class than you.


That being said, I do have mixed feelings about the reconstruction of UTMB. The population has been moving away from Galveston for years and concentrating in cites like Dallas, Houston, Austin. I agree that a hospital should remain because the indigent of the island rely upon it, but I don't know if a full-scale medical center is warranted. Even before the hurricane, anything really serious was sent an hour north to Houston, which has the world's largest medical center. It's just seems a little redundant. As for the medical school, it was built in the heyday of the island to serve a much larger and diverse population than it currently serves.

My opinion would be that these healthcare funds would be better used to develop an academic center in a healthy growing population - Austin. Why it doesn't already have a med school is beyond me. It has the patient base, the city is set up for young professionals, and academic resources abound. In Galveston, there is no work for the spouses and SO's of the students and residents, who must commute or put their lives on hold.

Obviously the point is moot, but I fail to see why this logic hasn't prevailed.
 
Top