UW format change

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

BrisketAttack

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
UW just changed it's format to 48 max questions/block. i guess this reflects the new 336 question test. So, we'll no longer have the round 1 hr/block. kinda weird. i wonder who decided that 336 questions was the optimal number. well, better than 350, i guess. unless the 14 missing questions were all easy. then that'd suck.
 
I thought it was still 1 hour a block, just 48 questions. This was to allow more time to do what will presumably be an increasing number of A/V quesions.
 
If it's only 58 minutes, is that how step 1 is now? Otherwise, UW must have just overlooked that and will change the time/question soon. It is weird though, messes up the clean percentages. Oh well, it's cool. I think 2 questions definitely makes a difference when it comes to having time to answer all the questions.
 
I was just about to post and ask about this. It ticks me off a bit because I was keeping my own averages so that I could chart my progress over time (something UWorld doesn't show you), and now the earlier blocks (50) and the new ones (48) are weighted differently. 🙄 I guess I'll have to spend a couple more minutes with Excel.

I also noticed that they added the option to "redo" a test... it's on the test list page - where it used to have only analysis and review now it includes "redo." I have no idea what that actually means since I haven't tried it. Does it replace your original score? Is it just like doing a set of used questions except that you can do those specific used questions?

Which brings up another question that has been bugging me... is the "average average" (i.e., the average score of all students using UWorld) only unused timed questions, or does it include all of the retakes, untimed, andsubject specific blocks that people do? If I do a block of previously used questions and score really high, it certainly goes into my personal average on UWorld. If it counts for the "average average" that UWorld reports, then it is certainly higher than the true random/unused/timed national average.
 
Top