Medstudentquest said:
Those are combined programs. This person is just wanting a spot in "anything"-does not sound too committed?
The OP stated they were interested in the primary care specialties (IM, FM, peds) and psych, not just "anything". I myself am leaning towards neuro, psych, and IM, not just "anything". I'd be
happy in a residency combining two out of three, but I'd be
content in either of these three. I am mostly interested in the brain and its relationship with other organ systems, I prefer analytical thinking to thinking on my feet, and I'd rather not do procedures all day long. Makes sense?
It makes probably as much sense for FMGs as it makes for AMGs (not just you, but a significant fraction of the SDN community) to apply to dermatology, radiology, and pathology which all have to do with interpreting lesions or the images thereof, and who all share a certain lifestyle.
I
could do FM but I'd be discontent while making others happy. I
couldn't do EM, surgery, OB/GYN or peds. I would make other people plain unhappy and they would throw me out. Makes sense?
A realistic strategy for FMGs with high scores consists of applying broadly (geographically) and having at a least one back-up specialty. FMGs with average-to-low scores, in this day and age, should have at least two back-ups.
I have a strong interest in psychiatry but failed to match in it, so I probably would be upset to find out that someone had taken a spot in psych only because they wanted any spot and not because they really liked the field.
Peppy, so far the OP hasn't taken anything from you, they're struggling just like you or worse.
Also, you don't know if this person's dream specialty is psych and their back-up is peds, or viceversa, or they're just a budding child psychiatrist who could put us both to shame (I'm no good with kids myself, don't know about you
😎).