-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Step I Webpath question
Started by omfs44
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
They're not too bad. In my opinion, they aren't as good as Robbin's Review of Pathology (it's pretty hard to be), but they're better than most other question sources out there. Plus, I remember that I learned a few things from a few Webpath questions that snatched a few extra points for me on my Path shelf.
thanks....i forgot to mention, im studying for step one right now, how's that for the test (not for 2nd year path classes!), is it worth doing all of them? there're like 1500 of them....are those questions tougher than the actual exam? what do you think, Stinger86, djipopo?
omfs44 said:thanks....i forgot to mention, im studying for step one right now, how's that for the test (not for 2nd year path classes!), is it worth doing all of them? there're like 1500 of them....are those questions tougher than the actual exam? what do you think, Stinger86, djipopo?
I only used Webpath while studying for my second year course, and even then I only worked probably 300 questions or so. In my opinion, your time is better spent reading through Robbin's Review of Pathology and BRS Pathology. Working through so many questions just doesn't seem worthwhile to me, but others would disagree.