- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 0
So, there's a pretty nice hospital with an acute care center down the road. The other day I saw a car accident just a few blocks away from the place. I don't know what kind of condition the victim was in, but I saw the ambulance speed away from the scene, sirens/lights on, and head away from the hospital, so I'm going to assume that someone was in the ambulance.
Now, I understand that centers like this don't take traumas and that they're not legally allowed to, but I'm a little confused as to why/how. Wouldn't it be better for the crash victim to be rushed to the nearest medical facility, even if it's not as well-equipped, than to die in the ambulance on the 30-minute trip to the closest ED? There are three Level II trauma centers about 20-30 minutes from here, and that seems like a long trip to me. I guess this place probably doesn't have any surgeons in-house, so maybe that's why, but still...the idea of that 30 minute ambulance ride is bugging me.
Are there any scenarios at all---like natural disaster, a factory explosion, etc.---in which this hospital COULD conceivably take patients, or would they all still be transported to other places?
Now, I understand that centers like this don't take traumas and that they're not legally allowed to, but I'm a little confused as to why/how. Wouldn't it be better for the crash victim to be rushed to the nearest medical facility, even if it's not as well-equipped, than to die in the ambulance on the 30-minute trip to the closest ED? There are three Level II trauma centers about 20-30 minutes from here, and that seems like a long trip to me. I guess this place probably doesn't have any surgeons in-house, so maybe that's why, but still...the idea of that 30 minute ambulance ride is bugging me.
Are there any scenarios at all---like natural disaster, a factory explosion, etc.---in which this hospital COULD conceivably take patients, or would they all still be transported to other places?
Last edited: