What are the UC schools looking for?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

CaliGirl14

No worries.
Removed
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
8,779
Reaction score
11
I've been looking through a lot of the threads and the consensus on UC schools seems like they are very extracurricular-oriented. What does that exactly mean? Are they looking for a lot of hours, shadowing, research? What do you think specifically would make someone a good canididate for a UC school?


I also live in California, if that helps.
 
Last edited:
That is the beauty of the UC schools, there is no cookie cutter applicant. All of the UC's have thier unique personalities, but most just want to see someone who is intelligent, has had meaningful exposure to medicine, and is passionate about something. I feel like UCs hate it when you are doing something solely for the sake of the application. During an interview, they wanna see passion in the things you talk about. This is what I have taken from the UCs
UCSD: Seems most numbers based, likes higher stats.
UCSF: Wants someone who stands out in whatever it is they do. Wants them to be the best in whatever it is they are passionate about.
Irvine: Prides itself on diversity and forming a class that has a wide range of people who have experienced life differently.
I can't comment much on Davis, or UCLA because I have not interviewed, thus haven't gotten a feel for the school. My friend interviewed at Davis, and he seemed to think they focused a lot on people who love to serve, and would be strong in thier patient care.

This is just my opinion though. Overall, just do something that makes you stand out (though make sure its positive lol)
 
I've been looking through a lot of threads and it the consensus on UC schools is that they're very extracurricular-oriented. What does that exactly mean? Are they looking for a lot of hours, shadowing, research? What do you think specifically would make someone a good canididate for a UC school?


I also live in California, if that helps.

All of the above. UC schools are very competitive and state residency is basically a must-have for even being considered. Anything to set you apart from the rest of the pack will be a bonus. So, find an good club, hospital, and research lab and spend your time there throughout the entire premed process. Focus on what you do and the impact it makes rather than counting the number of hours.
 
I personally think the entire medical process is a bit random and has a lot of luck involved but of course you have to have put in the work before to put yourself in a position where you can take advantage of the luck, but ultimately in my opinion getting into a UC school requires work + luck, without either one, it's almost impossible to get in.

I'm a Cali resident and applied to all five. Got interviews at UCSD, UCD, UCLA, no news from UCI (decision pending), and rejected at UCSF w/o an interview. I agree with the above poster that UCD seemed to focus very heavily on service. I'm not entirely convinced that UCSD is very heavily number focused. I did not think I had a very good shot while sending in my secondary and after interviewing and talkin to fellow interviewers that had much higher MCAT scores than me and interviewed at a number of top schools, I thought to myself on the drive home that that was likely as far as I could go with UCSD. A few weeks later, I got accepted at SD but rejected at Davis, and I'm still waiting to hear back at LA. With so many very well qualified applicants, UC schools have the luxury to be very very picky, and I remember a number of Deans during my interviews telling us that you're here because we know that you are academically qualified and that you can withstand the rigors of a medical school curriculum. We know you can graduate medical school. The question now is your personality and how you interact with people. Before, I thought they said those things just to calm us down but now, I think some schools do really stick by that statement especially the UCs. So, I think for candidates, you should maintain high enough stats to convince them that yes you can get through medical school but beyond that it's about being able to make yourself stand out during interviews and on your application. Do something unique and have a lot of passion for it (it shows) and it doesn't have to be related to medical school. At almost all my interviews, my interviewers focused very heavily on an activity of mine that had nothing to do with medical school, and they were all decently intrigued by it.

I guess to sum up everything above - your numbers convince them that you're intelligent enough to graduate medical school, your interviews + your activity convince them that you are an interesting person that can contribute to the diversity of the class. But even having said all this, I still do think that you need a fair amount of luck to get in - it depends on who reads your app, who interviews you, and whether or not you can find a common basis with your interviewers in a very short span of time.
 
Well, apparently they're are not looking for someone like me! Cali resident - 0 california school invites. 😕
 
I personally think the entire medical process is a bit random and has a lot of luck involved but of course you have to have put in the work before to put yourself in a position where you can take advantage of the luck, but ultimately in my opinion getting into a UC school requires work + luck, without either one, it's almost impossible to get in.

just because you dont understsand how it works doesnt default the situation to random chance or luck. Schools are just very very specific about what they are looking for. It may not make sense to you or me or anyone and therefore appear random, but its definitely not.
 
just because you dont understsand how it works doesnt default the situation to random chance or luck. Schools are just very very specific about what they are looking for. It may not make sense to you or me or anyone and therefore appear random, but its definitely not.

While I agree with what you are saying to a certain degree, the luck factor is big in this process (not just for UC, but all medical school). This is why there is no "safety school" for medical schools, because it has so much to do with who looks at your application and who interviews you. People have personal bias which the applicant may never know about. Therefore, luck can be a factor.
 
luck is always a factor. in anything. it doesn't really help to say that.
 
last time i checked, they were looking for money
 
Well, apparently they're are not looking for someone like me! Cali resident - 0 california school invites. 😕

The more important question is...who are you? (if you get the drift)
 
While I agree with what you are saying to a certain degree, the luck factor is big in this process (not just for UC, but all medical school). This is why there is no "safety school" for medical schools, because it has so much to do with who looks at your application and who interviews you. People have personal bias which the applicant may never know about. Therefore, luck can be a factor.

Well even what a lot of people may attribute to luck may still be very explainable. The process is run by people who have reasons for for what they do (whether or not we agree with them). Luck of course can be used in any case like someone above said.
 
this thread is great, picking up good tidbits 🙂
 
Does anyone know if a non-state resident has just as good a shot once they get an interview? I'm out of state and about to attend UCSF interview, but am worried I'm still at a huge disadvantage...
 
Does anyone know if a non-state resident has just as good a shot once they get an interview? I'm out of state and about to attend UCSF interview, but am worried I'm still at a huge disadvantage...



dean wofsy at ucsf said that once you get an interview your residency isn't a factor. it's just that a california resident is more likely to attend if accepted
 
you really don't like california, huh?

Cali residents are a bit to be envied since they have five really good public med school campuses to get into. Not sure what other state gives that kind advantage to its residents. They may be picky as this thread suggests, but it basically ensures you end up in a program with other students of similar interests.

At least he did not say "Californicators."

:laugh:
 
Cali residents are a bit to be envied since they have five really good public med school campuses to get into. Not sure what other state gives that kind advantage to its residents. They may be picky as this thread suggests, but it basically ensures you end up in a program with other students of similar interests.



:laugh:

Even so, apparently, it's really hard to get into these public med schools...California resident or not :/
 
I know this is frustratingly vague, but at UCSD it really comes down to smart, interesting, honest and confident people who know what they're getting themselves into.

I feel like UCs hate it when you are doing something solely for the sake of the application.

👍
 
Cali residents are a bit to be envied since they have five really good public med school campuses to get into. Not sure what other state gives that kind advantage to its residents. They may be picky as this thread suggests, but it basically ensures you end up in a program with other students of similar interests.



:laugh:

Eh I wouldn't envy us. It basically eliminates the concept of a safety school because our in state schools are as hard as or harder to get into than many out of state schools. That's not the kind of advantage I want from my state.
 
Eh I wouldn't envy us. It basically eliminates the concept of a safety school because our in state schools are as hard as or harder to get into than many out of state schools. That's not the kind of advantage I want from my state.
👍

California residents that aren't also applying to Harvard and the like feel amazingly lucky if they get an interview at a UC if that gives you an idea. I did research at UC Irvine med school and had my LORs written by people who worked for them (not all, just a couple) and they were the first school to reject me in the entire process.

basically a rule can be GREAT numbers are practically necessary. There are a few exceptions though...I have a friend who got an interview to UCSD with a 27 MCAT!
 
As long as you're not me, you should be fine. Cali resident but no interviews at any UC campuses. 😛
 
👍

California residents that aren't also applying to Harvard and the like feel amazingly lucky if they get an interview at a UC if that gives you an idea. I did research at UC Irvine med school and had my LORs written by people who worked for them (not all, just a couple) and they were the first school to reject me in the entire process.

basically a rule can be GREAT numbers are practically necessary. There are a few exceptions though...I have a friend who got an interview to UCSD with a 27 MCAT!

Is your friend by any means URM or Disadvantaged?
 
Top