- Joined
- Nov 13, 2015
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
I know that in various forms this topic has been discussed. But I have what I believe is a somewhat unique scenario. I'm curious what you all would do, given the following:
A PD asks all applicants at the end of interview day to "get back to me soon and write an email or a thank you note or something to me..." PD goes on to say that, "you don't have to get back to me right away, but sometime within the next few days or weeks, you should just reach out and say thanks, at least to the PD…," adding, "I'm not necessarily saying you have to write to everyone who interviewed with you, but you should at least write to the PD."
Yes, the PD is referring to self in the third person. What is perplexing to me about this, beyond the mere idiosyncrasies of the PD, is the position that I am now put in as applicant. The director is forcing me to write to them, though not violating a rule by explicitly requesting ranking information. However, when the PD receives my thank-you message, I must assume they are primarily interested in how I intend to rank them. If I say, for instance, "I intend to rank you highly" (even at this point in the season where I ought to be able to punt my decision because I've only done a quarter of my scheduled interviews), I am implying that I am not convinced that this particular program will necessarily be the best one I encounter. As humans, I think we can empathize with that experience of wanting choice, but unfortunately the politics of the match are not so fair. I'm legitimately stumped about the best approach to this one. Just thanking the person at face value and not even discussing rank-- is that even an option?
What do you guys think? How do you convey anything short of, "I love you and your my #1!"? I was hoping to avoid getting too entangled in the PD tango 🙁
-RS
A PD asks all applicants at the end of interview day to "get back to me soon and write an email or a thank you note or something to me..." PD goes on to say that, "you don't have to get back to me right away, but sometime within the next few days or weeks, you should just reach out and say thanks, at least to the PD…," adding, "I'm not necessarily saying you have to write to everyone who interviewed with you, but you should at least write to the PD."
Yes, the PD is referring to self in the third person. What is perplexing to me about this, beyond the mere idiosyncrasies of the PD, is the position that I am now put in as applicant. The director is forcing me to write to them, though not violating a rule by explicitly requesting ranking information. However, when the PD receives my thank-you message, I must assume they are primarily interested in how I intend to rank them. If I say, for instance, "I intend to rank you highly" (even at this point in the season where I ought to be able to punt my decision because I've only done a quarter of my scheduled interviews), I am implying that I am not convinced that this particular program will necessarily be the best one I encounter. As humans, I think we can empathize with that experience of wanting choice, but unfortunately the politics of the match are not so fair. I'm legitimately stumped about the best approach to this one. Just thanking the person at face value and not even discussing rank-- is that even an option?
What do you guys think? How do you convey anything short of, "I love you and your my #1!"? I was hoping to avoid getting too entangled in the PD tango 🙁
-RS