- Joined
- Oct 9, 2010
- Messages
- 191
- Reaction score
- 109
I was reading the new edition of Principles of Critical Care and in chapter 3 it discusses ICU staffing issues. There is a section on "NONPHYSICIAN EXTENDERS."
In said section, it states that NP staffing in the ICU has been highly beneficial, and cites a few studies showing that there is no difference
in mortality when patients are cared for by NPs vs. CCM fellows (in a step-down MICU). And PAs vs. house staff in the MICU showed no difference
in 28-day mortality, etc. whatever... my question is what do these individuals actually do in the ICU?
I notice none of these studies compare NP to fellows in MICU or SICU, the most it seems is just in "step-down MICU."
I don't see how this book can actually suggest said providers are simply "EXTENDERS" when they over-emphasize equivalence of care? Surely
they aren't deluded into thinking they will remain in that role for the long-term what with all these "equivalence" studies.
So I am just curious what type of cases an NP is able to manage on their own and what sort of procedures they are allowed to do on their own.
In said section, it states that NP staffing in the ICU has been highly beneficial, and cites a few studies showing that there is no difference
in mortality when patients are cared for by NPs vs. CCM fellows (in a step-down MICU). And PAs vs. house staff in the MICU showed no difference
in 28-day mortality, etc. whatever... my question is what do these individuals actually do in the ICU?
I notice none of these studies compare NP to fellows in MICU or SICU, the most it seems is just in "step-down MICU."
I don't see how this book can actually suggest said providers are simply "EXTENDERS" when they over-emphasize equivalence of care? Surely
they aren't deluded into thinking they will remain in that role for the long-term what with all these "equivalence" studies.
So I am just curious what type of cases an NP is able to manage on their own and what sort of procedures they are allowed to do on their own.