What do you consider a long-term EC?

[Lunasly]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Hey guys,

I was just curious to know what you all thought about the length of a long-term EC? Do you think 1 year is long term or is 3 years considered long term? More importantly, do you think there is a benefit to engaging in an EC for an x amount of time after what you consider long term? (ex. If you think that doing an EC for 2.5 years is long-term, do you think there is any benefit in continuing that EC any longer or would it be best to move on to something else and work your way up again?)

 

[NickNaylor]

I would arbitrarily say 2+ years. And I would personally find value in continuing something if you enjoy it.

 

[unhappytnt]

Depends on what sort of EC it is. If it's volunteering, adcomms like to see commitment so 2 or more years at the same position would look good. If it's something non-clinical, like sports or leadership, then I am guessing the length won't be too important.

 

[Lunasly]

Fair enough. I was thinking along the lines of 2 years. However, if I enjoyed the EC and decided to continue it past the 2 years, would that be more beneficial as opposed to starting another EC and doing that for 2 years assuming you like both?

 

[loveoforganic]

As long as you've got your bases covered (clinical experience, observing physicians, volunteering, +/- research depending on schools of interest), continue on with what you're passionate about.