What is this "new math" on the bio section?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

virtualmaster999

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2014
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
771
Hi all!

Quick question, since someone mentioned this to me.

So apparently some people have posted in their breakdown that there are like "new math bio" q's, that arent HW or the genetics stuff...could anyone elaborate on what that entails? Or whats it about?

I would really appreciate it..my test is on tue!

Thanks in advance!!
 
Hi all!

Quick question, since someone mentioned this to me.

So apparently some people have posted in their breakdown that there are like "new math bio" q's, that arent HW or the genetics stuff...could anyone elaborate on what that entails? Or whats it about?

I would really appreciate it..my test is on tue!

Thanks in advance!!


There is Beer's law equation A= ebc
That you may see on DAT bio section. You should be familiar with this.

This law allows one to determine how much light can a solution absorb based on its concentration, while the solute is dissolved in a solvent that does not absorb light.

Hope this helps.
 
There is Beer's law equation A= ebc
That you may see on DAT bio section. You should be familiar with this.

This law allows one to determine how much light can a solution absorb based on its concentration, while the solute is dissolved in a solvent that does not absorb light.

Hope this helps.

Interesting...at least it's something I already covered from the gen chem. My brain can only stuff so much more before this exam!

Thanks as always!
 
Few things that I can think off top of my head that has to do with math and biology are Nerst's equation, cardiac output, and filtration rate.

There may be more, but I think the common ones would be the first two that I mentioned.
 
Oh yeah, don't forget about stroke volume formula as well. Here is an example question that you might find on the biology section of the DAT. It isn't hard, but if you do not know the formula then it might can lower your biology score.

If a heart fills up to 200ml of blood before contraction, and leaves
50ml in the heart after contraction, what is the stroke volume? If
heart rate was 80 beats per minute, what would the cardiac output be?




Answer is:

a) 150ml/beat
b) 12 L/minute
 
Oh yeah, don't forget about stroke volume formula as well. Here is an example question that you might find on the biology section of the DAT. It isn't hard, but if you do not know the formula then it might can lower your biology score.

If a heart fills up to 200ml of blood before contraction, and leaves
50ml in the heart after contraction, what is the stroke volume? If
heart rate was 80 beats per minute, what would the cardiac output be?




Answer is:

a) 150ml/beat
b) 12 L/minute
Isn't cardiac out put sv*heart rate
 
Oh yeah, don't forget about stroke volume formula as well. Here is an example question that you might find on the biology section of the DAT. It isn't hard, but if you do not know the formula then it might can lower your biology score.

If a heart fills up to 200ml of blood before contraction, and leaves
50ml in the heart after contraction, what is the stroke volume? If
heart rate was 80 beats per minute, what would the cardiac output be?




Answer is:

a) 150ml/beat
b) 12 L/minute

Sweet thanks for that example. Not too bad, but like you said, w/o the formula, it's hard to get that right!
 
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/dat-breakdown-6-30.1146484/
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/my-detailed-dat-breakdown.1138218/
These people both did phenomenally, but they each touched on some maths that were not hardy weinberg. There could be more but these are the breakdowns that came to mind. I might be overanalyzing, but I feel that if theres something that wasn't covered in destroyer or feralis, it ought to be taken into account. Both of these posters used those resources.
 
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/dat-breakdown-6-30.1146484/
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/my-detailed-dat-breakdown.1138218/
These people both did phenomenally, but they each touched on some maths that were not hardy weinberg. There could be more but these are the breakdowns that came to mind. I might be overanalyzing, but I feel that if theres something that wasn't covered in destroyer or feralis, it ought to be taken into account. Both of these posters used those resources.
Thanks Ill look into this when I take a break...much appreciated!
 
Top