- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
- Messages
- 124
- Reaction score
- 133
What is the minimum LizzyM score, one thinks, to be deemed a high-stat applicant?
LizzyM is some bull. All comes down to your experiences in the medical field and helping underserved.
LizzyM is some bull. All comes down to your experiences in the medical field and helping underserved.
Clearly you will need more experiences than only volunteering in service corps. A 501/3.1 with two years volunteering in service corps, 2 years of paid clinical experiences, and quality research will get you places.apply with a 501/3.1 and two years in a volunteer service corps and let me know how that works out.
Clearly you will need more experiences than only volunteering in service corps. A 501/3.1 with two years volunteering in service corps, 2 years of paid clinical experiences, and quality research will get you places.
what are you basing this on. this is an unsupported claim
Consider that the median LizzyM for acceptees is ~68. Harvard/Stanford class schools have medians of 75 (3.9 GPA + 518 MCAT...36 on old exam). H4-ence, my rule of thumb is once you start getting into the caliber of Keck class schools, you're high stat (72= 515 or 34 on old scale + 3.8)What is the minimum LizzyM score, one thinks, to be deemed a high-stat applicant?
Maybe LMU or ACOM, but not even at at my school. Creighton/Loyola/BU/SLU and the other service loving schools? Definitely no.Clearly you will need more experiences than only volunteering in service corps. A 501/3.1 with two years volunteering in service corps, 2 years of paid clinical experiences, and quality research will get you places.
toucheMaybe LMU or ACOM, but not even at at my school. Creighton/Loyola/BU/SLU and the other service loving schools? Definitely no.
ECs get you through the door, but stats get you TO the door.
Or a veteran, a legacy, or some very compelling ECs or life story. Also, someone who reinvented themselves with an SMP might very well have a cGPA of 3.1, but that's not what counts.the thing that matters most in this whole process is if youre URM or not. Sad to say, but its 100% true. Someone with a 501 MCAT and is URM will receive multiple IIs and Ive witnessed it this cycle.
the thing that matters most in this whole process is if youre URM or not. Sad to say, but its 100% true. Someone with a 501 MCAT and is URM will receive multiple IIs and Ive witnessed it this cycle.
Touche. A black applicant with 3.2-3.4 GPA/500 MCAT (or old 24-26) has almost a 60% chance of acceptance, whereas an Asian or White applicant with the same stats has about a 6% and 8%, respectively, chance of acceptance to an American MD program
Im all for a URM getting chosen to interview ahead of me because they have a better record or whatever, but the fact that skin color plays a role in this process is wrong.
The fact that skin color played a role in centuries of slavery and legalized racial oppression, leading to vast, racially-demarcated inequities in healthcare access and outcomes is wrong. We need Black and Latinx doctors dude
Honestly, as someone who is a URM, I personally think that selection should be merit-based, considering academic/extracurricular performance first and foremost. Moreover, what about those minorities who aren't African American or Hispanic, nor are URMs- Asians? They suffer hugely from this too. I understand the issues at hand, and why people like me may be beneficiaries of it in selection, but objectively speaking, it should not be the case. A tit-for-tat approach to racial segregation and opportunity isn't the best way to go about it.
If accepted, no doubt I would have to live with many people viewing me as getting the position due to being an URM, rather than through working hard and doing well in my own right.
No. It's got to be a little bit lower than that. I don't think there's a definitive cut-off. Depends on the school. My stats are lower (and non URM) and over half a dozen MD IIs this cycle thus far. US News #1 ranked school in care (U of Wash) accepted someone with a 499 last year.Isn't 3.1/501 a bit too low for MDs? Don't you need at least a 3.5 and a 508 to be considered for MD schools?
No. It's got to be a little bit lower than that. I don't think there's a definitive cut-off. Depends on the school. My stats are lower (and non URM) and over half a dozen MD IIs this cycle thus far. US News #1 ranked school in care (U of Wash) accepted someone with a 499 last year.
It can get you into DO but that's it. Trust me, I have similar stats.Clearly you will need more experiences than only volunteering in service corps. A 501/3.1 with two years volunteering in service corps, 2 years of paid clinical experiences, and quality research will get you places.
and being a DO can get you placesIt can get you into DO but that's it. Trust me, I have similar stats.
I agree, the system is a bit flawed. I have colleagues that constitute as URM, but some of them come from extremely well off families - both parents as MDs - and these guys are milking the system landing countless interviews, some at extremely prestigious institutions. Oh well, whattyagonnado?Its so wrong. I have african american friends who come from higher household incomes than mine and laugh about how much slack they get cut. Im all for a URM getting chosen to interview ahead of me because they have a better record or whatever, but the fact that skin color plays a role in this process is wrong.
I dont mean to turn this into another URM debate thread thing, but I just gotta get that out of my system
Just do better than them in medical school and boards and beat them out when applying to residences, that's what really matters.I 100% agree that those things happened are wrong, and I firmly believe that an African American or Hispanic or whatever else ethnicity constitutes URM status with high stats and better ECs than me should get accepted over me. But someone with an MCAT of 500 and a 3.3 GPA should not be sitting on 5+ IIs right now because of their skin color. Everybody wants to eliminate discrimination and racism, but in order to do that youve got to eliminate it from both sides.
I know more people are probably going to disagree with me, but I just thought Id throw my opinion out there.
515+ no subsection score less than 128, and a 3.9+ sGPA and cGPA.What is the minimum LizzyM score, one thinks, to be deemed a high-stat applicant?
I agree, the system is a bit flawed. I have colleagues that constitute as URM, but some of them come from extremely well off families - both parents as MDs - and these guys are milking the system landing countless interviews, some at extremely prestigious institutions. Oh well, whattyagonnado?
Ah, the 3 W's of medical school application process, I completely forgot about those haha! The applications I find most striking are the "odd ones out." At a school I know of with a 512 MCAT average, a non-URM, non-Legacy, regular old pre-med with the standard ECs with a 506 and a 3.61 was interviewed in September. Luck? Eh, who knows, its n = 1.What did I say recently about how luck plays a part in admissions beginning with when, where and to whom you were born?
Ah, the 3 W's of medical school application process, I completely forgot about those haha! The applications I find most striking are the "odd ones out." At a school I know of with a 512 MCAT average, a non-URM, non-Legacy, regular old pre-med with the standard ECs with a 506 and a 3.61 was interviewed in September. Luck? Eh, who knows, its n = 1.
LizzyM is some bull. All comes down to your experiences in the medical field and helping underserved.
Honestly had no idea it was a real person, just thought it was some arbitrary name for an algorithm... sorry LizzyMWow....you really don't know how the process works. And dissing the Divine LizzyM is just dumb.
I got roasted by herBy the way, I can't believe you said that to LizzyM. I would die just to get noticed and recognized by her.
No. It's got to be a little bit lower than that. I don't think there's a definitive cut-off. Depends on the school. My stats are lower (and non URM) and over half a dozen MD IIs this cycle thus far. US News #1 ranked school in care (U of Wash) accepted someone with a 499 last year.
Wait, what?! The mechanic?! That's it, eureka! Time to volunteer non-clinically at the nearest autobody shop near my #1 school...bound to get some "networking" in 😉.Sometimes it is the oddest thing... the applicant's uncle is the Dean's tennis partner or his mechanic.
If it makes you feel better, I've been roasted by a number of admins, mods, and frequent posters on SDN. Ow!I got roasted by her
If it makes you feel better, I've been roasted by a number of admins, mods, and frequent posters on SDN. Ow!
The fact that skin color played a role in centuries of slavery and legalized racial oppression, leading to current, vast, racially-demarcated inequities in healthcare access and outcomes is wrong. We need Black and Latinx doctors
What would those communities be? Do we have to keep "those people" in segregated communities? What about appointing them to the medical school faculty of non-HBCU schools? Hiring them at the NIH? Do some people need to know their place?I would agree with this IF AND ONLY IF those doctors served in those relevant communities. This is not always the case.
What would those communities be? Do we have to keep "those people" in segregated communities? What about appointing them to the medical school faculty of non-HBCU schools? Hiring them at the NIH? Do some people need to know their place?
Not necessarily.
By “those communities”, I am trying to reference communities with high black/Latin populations. I believe that we’ve generally defeated the purpose of affirmative action if the people benefitting from it do not make an attempt to revitalize the communities that caused affirmative action to become a thing in the first place.
Life's not fair, especially when medical outcomes are at stake.there are three URM's posting around here with almost 20 MD interview invites. how the **** is that possible or fair ???? lol. that is completely insane to me
Not necessarily.
By “those communities”, I am trying to reference communities with high black/Latin populations. I believe that we’ve generally defeated the purpose of affirmative action if the people benefitting from it do not make an attempt to revitalize the communities that caused affirmative action to become a thing in the first place.
Interesting that you say this, because I and many of the other URM's during the interview trail that I have talked to and the ones on these forums have expressed interest in ultimately working in communities of color during their careers. I want to work in an urban area with sizeable black and immigrant populations because those are my people, and it's important that I serve people that look like me. There are a lot of assumptions being made about URM applicants without actually knowing us and our motivations.
I will agree. It would leave a fowl taste in my mouth if the shoe was on the other foot. As a URM, I know *when* I am accepted to medical school, some people are going to assume I am there by affirmative action. Whether or not that is true, it is helpful knowing after living a crap-fest life (sketchy neighborhoods, parents that barely passed high school, sob story, etc...) that a school gives a little leniency, because I intend on serving where I came from. Now, for the others that are abusing the system, I am not a fan and think it is not fair. My wife (Non-URM) gets upset about this issue as well. As my grandpa and @Goro stated, life isn't fair.the thing that matters most in this whole process is if youre URM or not. Sad to say, but its 100% true. Someone with a 501 MCAT and is URM will receive multiple IIs and Ive witnessed it this cycle.