What the heck is her diagnosis?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Doc Samson said:
Axis I: r/o Ganser's Syndrome
Axis II: defer
Axis III: Morbid obesity

All 3 huh?


Sazi thats not a diagnose 🙁
 
Anuwolf said:
All 3 huh?


Sazi thats not a diagnose 🙁

I agree with DS. He's being facetious with the Ganser's comment, but there is truth to it.

"No diagnosis" is just as valid as a diagnosis, right?
 
So that is what you look like Anuwolf? I though they told you not to seek personal medical advice on this forum.












😉 😛 Just kidding
 
Anasazi23 said:
I agree with DS. He's being facetious with the Ganser's comment, but there is truth to it.

"No diagnosis" is just as valid as a diagnosis, right?

Absolutely, although insurance won't pay for a consultation if you don't make any axis I diagnosis - hence lots of "Adjustment DO" diagnoses when we really mean "no mental illness." And yes, I was being facetious.
 
Did anyone notice the cat's behavior? It seemed kind of odd. Almost as if it was scared to eat it's food. Seems as if it's been treated like this before and is "watching" out for it's own safety.

I don't know. I could be totally over analyzing this. Very strange video, nonetheless.
 
That was the stupidest video I've ever seen - I want those 40 seconds of my life back - sorry Solid had to steal your line 😡
 
That look on the cats face. I think she knows that her owner is nuts.

If any of you guys ever see her on the streets... go and hog tie her and take her to your hospital!

Why, except for the cat, nobody seems to be in danger of getting hurt here.
 
Anasazi23 said:
That was MY line!
😡

😉


WOOPS! have fun in daytona - dont be overworked as usual 😱 😉
 
couldn't finish the whole video.
 
You've GOT to be kidding me. This is the last time I acknowledge anything "A New Wolf" posts. That was nauseating!
 
Milo said:
couldn't finish the whole video.

Did you allow the video to load completly before watching the video?
 
Anuwolf said:
Did you allow the video to load completly before watching the video?


I didn't have technical problems per se, the difficulty was combating the waves of nausea.
 
Are you saying that the psychiatric industry is engaged in a practice and pattern of insurance fraud via mail and wire, putting down false diagnoses falsely accusing peope of being mentally ill thus defamation and causing other unjustified harm to such persons, to fraudulently obtain money for themselves from insurance companies

Doc Samson said:
Absolutely, although insurance won't pay for a consultation if you don't make any axis I diagnosis - hence lots of "Adjustment DO" diagnoses when we really mean "no mental illness." And yes, I was being facetious.
 
You don't think a doctor deserves to be compensated for a consultation? Get real. Look to the insurance companies if you ave a problem with the way things work.
 
TodayHello said:
Are you saying that the psychiatric industry is engaged in a practice and pattern of insurance fraud via mail and wire, putting down false diagnoses falsely accusing peope of being mentally ill thus defamation and causing other unjustified harm to such persons, to fraudulently obtain money for themselves from insurance companies


Sazi, she's backkkkk... <theme from Jaws playing in my head> or... <the shining theme> :meanie:
 
The whole post from "today hello" was nothing more than a sdn version of the twisted celeb mags. Gosh I wish there were some psych screenings mandatory before you can post in here, yet "they" do make for an interesting late night read! :laugh:
 
The issue of whether a doctor deserves to be compensated for a consultation and if so by who depends on the circumstances of the consultation.

If a person who paints houses for a living painted your house without your request and consent would you be required to pay him of course not. Likewise if someone sent you a magazine subscription you did not order would you be required to pay for it of course not. These are unsolicited gifts which the recipient is entitled to keep for free and not pay for.

Likewise if a doctor provides a consult without the request and consent of the subject or which the subject never agreed to pay for then the doctor does not deserve to be compensated.

If a patient requests a consult and the doctor discloses his fee for such and the patient agrees to pay this then yes the doctor deserved to be compensated for the consult from the patient

If a third party requests a consult and the doctor discloses his fee for such and the 3rd party agrees to pay this then yes the doctor deserved to be compensated for the consult from the 3rd party. This however would not excuse the doctor from liability to the subject of the consult if anything physical is done to said subject without his consent, if defamatory statements are made, if said subjects privacy is violated, or said subjects rights are otherwise violated.

None of this gives the doctor the right to receive compensation from an insurer who never agreed to pay the doctor. Insurance is a contract between the insured and the insurer and only covers those items in the insurance contract.

If the insurance contract does not cover checkups or only covers sick persons and this person is seeking a checkup or is not sick then there is no insurance coverage and it is a crime insurance fraud to make a false diagnoses to defraud the insurer and steal money from the insurer.

Insurance rates are determined by the coverage provided, If the insurance covered things like check ups and other times when a person is not sick then the insurance would be more expensive. The insured decided to buy the policy with less coverage which is less expensive, that is a decision of the insured and there is simply no basis for the doctor to lie to steal money from the insurer.

If an insured has auto insurance but only has liability coverage and not collision and the insured gets in an accident can the insured or his agent lie and claim someone else caused the accident if they did not, what if it were a one person accident can the insured make up a false story about the cause of the accident or claim injuries they do not have, of course not, that is insurance fraud. Likewise if a doctor lies to obtain money from an insurer.

The thing that makes doctors lying to obtain money from insurance companies so egregious is that the insurance company is not the only one harmed by this. If a doctor says a person is mentally ill and the person is not that is defamatory to said person and causes harm to such person. If a doctor falsely imprisons a person in a hospital and then lies to get money from an insurance company such insurance fraud causes harm to the person falsely imprisoned. One way to make sure doctors pay when they falsely imprison people or lie and claim a person not mentally ill is mentally is is to be sure to notify the insurer of the insurance fraud. Some insurance entities provide money to informants of said insurance fraud.

Another issue regarding insurance fraud is when a hospital and their employee board certified physicians who never examined, met, or spoke to the person and who were not even on the premises at the time bill large amounts of money for a one minute insurance inquiry by an unsupervised resident who is not competent, not certified, not licensed, with no medical degree from any US accredited medical school and do not speak English. They pay the resident around $10.00 an hour and then bill at a rate of several hundred dollars an hour and keep the money for themselves. This in addition to the fact that the doctor and resident are not entitled to any money because no one agreed to pay them any money


Psyclops said:
You don't think a doctor deserves to be compensated for a consultation? Get real. Look to the insurance companies if you ave a problem with the way things work.
 
Referring to a person who informs you that you are violating the law as a shark or jaws etc is very unoriginal

Poety said:
Sazi, she's backkkkk... <theme from Jaws playing in my head> or... <the shining theme> :meanie:
 
If a psych screening were mandatory before posting Pschmom1 would never be allowed on this board. By the way pschmom1 are you a man or a woman or a HeShe. You use the word mom in your name but have a picture of a man.


pschmom1 said:
The whole post from "today hello" was nothing more than a sdn version of the twisted celeb mags. Gosh I wish there were some psych screenings mandatory before you can post in here, yet "they" do make for an interesting late night read! :laugh:
 
HiToday said:
If a psych screening were mandatory before posting Pschmom1 would never be allowed on this board. By the way pschmom1 are you a man or a woman or a HeShe. You use the word mom in your name but have a picture of a man.


The picture you are referring to is Vincent Van Gogh, a famous artist who had a long family history of severe mental illness and he himself suffered from mental insanity. He became famous long after his death on July 29, 1890. He is renowned for self portraits of himself and his art is conflicted with Christianity and insanity. One of his famous pieces "Starry Night" was painted while he was in an insane asylum. Some believe his mental insanity was due to the fact that his mother had a child one year prior that was still born on the same date he was born and was also named Vincent. Anyways, now that you know some valuable artistic history, I can assure you that I am mentally A-OK! 😉
 
Top