I'm studying metabolism and glycolysis. I can learn the facts but it bothers me when I don't understand WHY things are happening.
In glycolysis F6P is converted into F16BP by the use of enzyme PFK1.
This enzyme is stimulated by AMP, which I find logical. Low AMP means low
energy level in cell so we'd want to break down more sugar.
But PFK1 is also stimulated by F26BP. This is supposedly very important, but I don' really get it.
When there is a lot of F6P it is converted into F26BP. In this way (through the stimulation F26BP gives) PFK1 is converting more F6P into F16BP. But this really seems to go against the rule of Ocham's razor. Why is PFK1 not simply stimulated by its substrate (F6P)??? Also, if the substrate in high levels is converted into another molecule, then we are losing substrate molecules for the enzyme to use as substrate and transform into product?? Do you understand what I mean? Like if you were really hungry and all hot dogs were converted into cars. Then there would be nothing left to it? 😎
That is my first question.
The second question is this; AMP is stimulating PFK1, because AMP is a "signature" for low cell energy. But F26BP is a signature for HIGH cell energy levels as far as I'm concerned (F26BP is made when there is a lot of F6P and hence a lot of sugar coming into the system). Is this a case of trying to avoid a "futile cycle" where metabolites are being shuffled from one place to the other, never following a single direction all the way?? It seems strange to me. It's like if the cell was saying "true, (if AMP is high let's say) I do have a lot of ATP but I still have a lot of sugar lying around so I'll break it down anyways". Weird to me. 😳
I would just be very happy if someone could explain to me in a simple way what is the
use of these PFK2/FBPase2/PFK1/F26BP molecules being highly interconnected in the way they affect each other.
I've read on wiki but I couldn't find the underlying "reason" why all these molecules are needed, when this seems to have been made in a simpler way.
(sorry if English is bad, not native speaker)
In glycolysis F6P is converted into F16BP by the use of enzyme PFK1.
This enzyme is stimulated by AMP, which I find logical. Low AMP means low
energy level in cell so we'd want to break down more sugar.
But PFK1 is also stimulated by F26BP. This is supposedly very important, but I don' really get it.
When there is a lot of F6P it is converted into F26BP. In this way (through the stimulation F26BP gives) PFK1 is converting more F6P into F16BP. But this really seems to go against the rule of Ocham's razor. Why is PFK1 not simply stimulated by its substrate (F6P)??? Also, if the substrate in high levels is converted into another molecule, then we are losing substrate molecules for the enzyme to use as substrate and transform into product?? Do you understand what I mean? Like if you were really hungry and all hot dogs were converted into cars. Then there would be nothing left to it? 😎
That is my first question.
The second question is this; AMP is stimulating PFK1, because AMP is a "signature" for low cell energy. But F26BP is a signature for HIGH cell energy levels as far as I'm concerned (F26BP is made when there is a lot of F6P and hence a lot of sugar coming into the system). Is this a case of trying to avoid a "futile cycle" where metabolites are being shuffled from one place to the other, never following a single direction all the way?? It seems strange to me. It's like if the cell was saying "true, (if AMP is high let's say) I do have a lot of ATP but I still have a lot of sugar lying around so I'll break it down anyways". Weird to me. 😳
I would just be very happy if someone could explain to me in a simple way what is the
use of these PFK2/FBPase2/PFK1/F26BP molecules being highly interconnected in the way they affect each other.
I've read on wiki but I couldn't find the underlying "reason" why all these molecules are needed, when this seems to have been made in a simpler way.
(sorry if English is bad, not native speaker)