Hi. Are there any books that outline the criteria required for admitting a patient. Also, when admitted, what are the criteria required to discharge. Thanks.
Hi. Are there any books that outline the criteria required for admitting a patient. Also, when admitted, what are the criteria required to discharge. Thanks.
Hi. Are there any books that outline the criteria required for admitting a patient. Also, when admitted, what are the criteria required to discharge. Thanks.
You admit when the ED can't figure out what to do with the patient.
You discharge when they can eat, walk, and wipe their own ass at home. If they can't do that, you discharge when you have found a place or a person that will feed them, move them, and wipe their asses.
Just some observations I've had over the last few years as to why the ED and most inpatient services don't get along in academic medical centers:
1) ED is worried about dispo first and foremost, mainly because they have a truckload patients to sort through in their waiting room and need to make sure they don't have someone dying there.
2) When the ED calls, it means more work for the hospital service. No one likes that. In academic medicine this is met with groans. In private practice, it is the lifeblood of the specialist. Don't get into the habit of groaning... it is a hard habit to break.
3) ED has to work fast with little info. It is easy to look back at the data and synthesize what was going on from the beginning. Hindsight is 20/20. I mean 3 liters of fluid to the guy with advanced heart failure sounded like a good idea at the time (i kid, i kid)
4) ED docs seem to be more risk averse. I don't know if it is because they get sued more or they hear about their partner who got sued.
5) It is a sh.t show in most ERs. If the floors were this kind of a madhouse, I think everyone in IM would quit.
Considering that EM has a relatively controlled lifestyle when it comes to actual work time - set number of shifts per month, set number of time per shift per month, it's not at all surprising that inpatient services, such as IM and Surgery, that don't have this luxury, don't get along with the ED. As far as 1) they can truly prioritize who they see.Just some observations I've had over the last few years as to why the ED and most inpatient services don't get along in academic medical centers:
1) ED is worried about dispo first and foremost, mainly because they have a truckload patients to sort through in their waiting room and need to make sure they don't have someone dying there.
2) When the ED calls, it means more work for the hospital service. No one likes that. In academic medicine this is met with groans. In private practice, it is the lifeblood of the specialist. Don't get into the habit of groaning... it is a hard habit to break.
3) ED has to work fast with little info. It is easy to look back at the data and synthesize what was going on from the beginning. Hindsight is 20/20. I mean 3 liters of fluid to the guy with advanced heart failure sounded like a good idea at the time (i kid, i kid)
4) ED docs seem to be more risk averse. I don't know if it is because they get sued more or they hear about their partner who got sued.
5) It is a sh.t show in most ERs. If the floors were this kind of a madhouse, I think everyone in IM would quit.