Assuming both are fairly typical experiences, which is generally viewed as more valuable for fellowship applications — a PGY-3 Chief Residency or a year as a Heme/Onc hospitalist post-residency?
Assuming both are fairly typical experiences, which is generally viewed as more valuable for fellowship applications — a PGY-3 Chief Residency or a year as a Heme/Onc hospitalist post-residency?
That honestly put it better than I could have. I’ll add that most programs won’t let their crappy residents be chief so it’s like a legit “we vouch for this person” thing
I wouldn’t necessarily recommend chief year to anyone because financially it’s a big hit but it worked out for where I was in life (among other things I needed to burn a year because my now spouse was behind me in training) and I honestly did learn a lot of people management/office politic skills that I still use today.
I can tell you my fellowship program seemed to value it we always had 1/3 of our fellows that were former chiefs. My research game was weak though.