Which factor carries more weight in a fellowship application?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ayjaystudent

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
610
Reaction score
317
Assuming both are fairly typical experiences, which is generally viewed as more valuable for fellowship applications — a PGY-3 Chief Residency or a year as a Heme/Onc hospitalist post-residency?
 
Assuming both are fairly typical experiences, which is generally viewed as more valuable for fellowship applications — a PGY-3 Chief Residency or a year as a Heme/Onc hospitalist post-residency?
Neither of them will have any meaningful impact on your application except possibly at the place you were a Heme/Onc hospitalist.
 
Shows commitment to education, administration and people management and gives healthcare system experience outside of being just a note monkey.
That honestly put it better than I could have. I’ll add that most programs won’t let their crappy residents be chief so it’s like a legit “we vouch for this person” thing

I wouldn’t necessarily recommend chief year to anyone because financially it’s a big hit but it worked out for where I was in life (among other things I needed to burn a year because my now spouse was behind me in training) and I honestly did learn a lot of people management/office politic skills that I still use today.

I can tell you my fellowship program seemed to value it we always had 1/3 of our fellows that were former chiefs. My research game was weak though.
 
Top