- Joined
- Dec 4, 2004
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello everyone,
I am a soon-to-be graduate from a very academic university in Ontario, Canada. I have applied to optometry for the 2004-05 year and have been accepted to PCO, invited to interview at SUNY, Nova, and NECO, and am still waiting to hear from Waterloo.
Although I have been accepted to PCO, and would love to go there, I am having trouble with the thought of spending ~$200,000-$250,000 CAD to go to school there vs. a fraction of that at Waterloo. I would much prefer to stay in Canada and attend Waterloo; however, I am quite nervous about being accepted there as my grades are on the low end of their acceptable range (though I do have a solid OAT score, recommendations, optometric, and volunteer experience). Although my program and institution are quite competitive and respected, I'm not convinced I'll even be granted an interview. I am thus already trying to decide what I will do if I am rejected from Waterloo.
My question is this: Is it a good idea to do a 2-year Opticianry college diploma to improve my application to Waterloo? It seems to me that the 2 years lost are offset with the gain in optical experience, the assumed significant boost to my grades, the huge financial savings, and hopefully the chance to stay in Canada and attend Waterloo. But what I am wondering is, will the admissions committee at Waterloo (or optometry schools in general) like to see this background, and be more inclined to admit me? I have seen a few postings on the forum of people who have 'optical experience' who went on to attend optometry programs. I think it is also a good idea also since I will no doubt be able to use these skills later on as an optometrist.
So: Is going from opticianry to optometry a logical, or even desirable, progression in the eyes of optometry schools, and will it help me get into Waterloo?
(Thanks for your opinions - I'd also like to give a shout out to any Ontario optometry applicants, and good luck to all the Waterloo applicants specifically. Apparently we need it...)
I am a soon-to-be graduate from a very academic university in Ontario, Canada. I have applied to optometry for the 2004-05 year and have been accepted to PCO, invited to interview at SUNY, Nova, and NECO, and am still waiting to hear from Waterloo.
Although I have been accepted to PCO, and would love to go there, I am having trouble with the thought of spending ~$200,000-$250,000 CAD to go to school there vs. a fraction of that at Waterloo. I would much prefer to stay in Canada and attend Waterloo; however, I am quite nervous about being accepted there as my grades are on the low end of their acceptable range (though I do have a solid OAT score, recommendations, optometric, and volunteer experience). Although my program and institution are quite competitive and respected, I'm not convinced I'll even be granted an interview. I am thus already trying to decide what I will do if I am rejected from Waterloo.
My question is this: Is it a good idea to do a 2-year Opticianry college diploma to improve my application to Waterloo? It seems to me that the 2 years lost are offset with the gain in optical experience, the assumed significant boost to my grades, the huge financial savings, and hopefully the chance to stay in Canada and attend Waterloo. But what I am wondering is, will the admissions committee at Waterloo (or optometry schools in general) like to see this background, and be more inclined to admit me? I have seen a few postings on the forum of people who have 'optical experience' who went on to attend optometry programs. I think it is also a good idea also since I will no doubt be able to use these skills later on as an optometrist.
So: Is going from opticianry to optometry a logical, or even desirable, progression in the eyes of optometry schools, and will it help me get into Waterloo?
(Thanks for your opinions - I'd also like to give a shout out to any Ontario optometry applicants, and good luck to all the Waterloo applicants specifically. Apparently we need it...)