Look, I have a great deal of respect for Stanford. My California pride dwarfs my contempt for Stanford, and any school that draws attention from the Ivies to California is a great thing in my book. Even USC, as much as I hate 'em, I'm still somewhat glad to see that the No. 1 team in the nation is in California. But, credit where credit is due. Stanford students enjoy inflated grades relative to Cal students. You pay a lot to go to Stanford, and Stanford understands that alumni money depends on a degree of customer satisfaction. Cal, by contrast, gets a ridiculously small amount of alumni money per graduate for a top tier school.
When I read that, it pisses me off when anyone tries to doubt that the students at Cal have to work harder for their As than do their counterparts at Stanford. It also pisses me off when I read:
I get friggin' POed. In addititon to misrepresenting the grade distribution, I can only give a great big "F*** you and the horse you rode in on" to any of the public university disparaging elitist pricks. Yeah, Berkeley is a public school, and i'm damned proud to say that I had to work hard for my degrees. I'm also stoked that I didn't have to pay a dime in tuition, and yet I still went through a ChemE program that was superior to that at Stanford.
Credit where credit is due. Stanford's got a great deal of money, a really nice student body (everyone I've met from Stanford in person has been totally nice and totally cool), a nice campus (in a retirement-community kind of way), and excellent programs in basically every manner of professional school. I would really like to attend grad school there, in all honesty; it's my top choice for grad school. But I really think that Berkeley gets overlooked for what a great institution it is, because to many people can't see past the fact that its a public school.
Peace to you. But you ain't gettin' the axe back any time soon. 😀 😉 😛