Your thoughts

Started by DeltronZ
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
D

DeltronZ

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
What are your views on Creighton, UCLA, USC, and Marquette in terms of everything. keep ryhmze to a minimum
 
UCLA: poor patient pool, P/NP system
USC: PBL system, good patient pool.
Marquette: too expensive, too cold. New school, good curriculum.
Creighton: the school is good, but who wants to live in Nebraska?

That's my 02 cents. Any one cares to chip in some input?
 
I agree with you Tinker bell on UCLA and USC (not too familiar with Marquette and Creighton, though).

UCLA: very cheap tuition (especially for Cali residents), high cost of living (in Westwood, neighboring Beverly Hills), very academic, poor facilities, poor patient pool, but good reputation.

USC: very expensive tuition + cost of living (~ $73,000 /year), PBL curriculum (you either love it or hate it), excellent facilities, great patient pool, and good reputation. One more, great alumni connections in Southern California.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.