- Joined
- Feb 4, 2000
- Messages
- 5,910
- Reaction score
- 41
I did a search and found some useful info here on SDN...so I guess I am posting this just to reassure myself that I am thinking about this the right way.
First of all, disability insurance.
Most people I have spoken to agree that getting disability insurance NOW (about to start PGY-1) is the way to go. I can lock in a rate on my current income and then in the future when my income increases, I can simply buy more coverage (at a higher rate of course) but at least I will have some coverage at the lower rate.
Also, I have come to the conclusion that own occupation insurance is the way to go...this way they cant claim I am not disable (abled? ) if I can do some other job. Basically...if I cant be a surgeon, I am disabled.
I have also found that non-cancellable & guaranteed renewable coverage is best. This way my locked in rate cant go up and they cant cancel my policy when my income goes up (thus making their potential payout greater).
So thats where I am sitting with that.
Anyone care to share (privately if you wish) what they are currently paying for disability insurance and what type of coverage they have?
Also, all the reading I have done says that it is a good idea to have your OWN insurance, even if a practice or hospital offers coverage.
Now...LIFE insurance.
I cannot find ANY reason to buy life insurance.
#1 - I have no dependants
#2 - my fiancee (future wife if she picks a date) has a good job, makes good money and plans to continue working
All the resources tell me that the only people who need life insurance are those who have people who are DEPENDANT on the income.
My fiancees insurance agent is trying to sell her whole life insurance...because the rates are lower for her now and she can borrow against the policy.
Well, my math says that her monthly premium would earn more in private investments.
PLUS...she doesnt NEED the insurance. Even when we get married, we will be able to support ourselves independently if need be.
So I dont see any reason that her or I need insurance.
Now, if/when we have kids then we will obviously explore that. But is there a reason to lock in a rate now on the chance that we may need coverage later? My brain is telling me that the potentially higher rates later in life will be worth it...the low rates we would pay now might be great, but in the long run the money we are paying now in life insurance premiums would earn more as investment money, thus in 20 years the net gain would be greater than the potential savings of a lower locked in rate.
Did any of that make sense?
Any comments?
Am I on the right track?
First of all, disability insurance.
Most people I have spoken to agree that getting disability insurance NOW (about to start PGY-1) is the way to go. I can lock in a rate on my current income and then in the future when my income increases, I can simply buy more coverage (at a higher rate of course) but at least I will have some coverage at the lower rate.
Also, I have come to the conclusion that own occupation insurance is the way to go...this way they cant claim I am not disable (abled? ) if I can do some other job. Basically...if I cant be a surgeon, I am disabled.
I have also found that non-cancellable & guaranteed renewable coverage is best. This way my locked in rate cant go up and they cant cancel my policy when my income goes up (thus making their potential payout greater).
So thats where I am sitting with that.
Anyone care to share (privately if you wish) what they are currently paying for disability insurance and what type of coverage they have?
Also, all the reading I have done says that it is a good idea to have your OWN insurance, even if a practice or hospital offers coverage.
Now...LIFE insurance.
I cannot find ANY reason to buy life insurance.
#1 - I have no dependants
#2 - my fiancee (future wife if she picks a date) has a good job, makes good money and plans to continue working
All the resources tell me that the only people who need life insurance are those who have people who are DEPENDANT on the income.
My fiancees insurance agent is trying to sell her whole life insurance...because the rates are lower for her now and she can borrow against the policy.
Well, my math says that her monthly premium would earn more in private investments.
PLUS...she doesnt NEED the insurance. Even when we get married, we will be able to support ourselves independently if need be.
So I dont see any reason that her or I need insurance.
Now, if/when we have kids then we will obviously explore that. But is there a reason to lock in a rate now on the chance that we may need coverage later? My brain is telling me that the potentially higher rates later in life will be worth it...the low rates we would pay now might be great, but in the long run the money we are paying now in life insurance premiums would earn more as investment money, thus in 20 years the net gain would be greater than the potential savings of a lower locked in rate.
Did any of that make sense?
Any comments?
Am I on the right track?