- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Messages
- 3,016
- Reaction score
- 52
I'm surprised so many went into OB/GYN. Alot of other match lists indicate that folks are fleeing from that speciality.
Damn. P & S is freakin' stacked in neurosurgery. Why does the school have such a strong placement in ns?
Columbia is known for placing students in surgery and surgical subspecialties.Damn. P & S is freakin' stacked in neurosurgery. Why does the school have such a strong placement in ns?
I would guess that a good portion of the people who matched in neurosurgery had an idea that that is what they wanted to do from the beginning and perhaps chose Columbia for that reason. Columbia is forever known for their neurosurgery program.
They didn't match at Columbia because (at least for two of them) they were too busy matching at the top NS program in the country--Barrow Neurological Institute.I want to agree with you, but I'm still puzzled by this: If you look at Columbia's match list, all their ns matches were outside the institution. What you are saying would make sense if 4th year students matched INTO their home institution rather than OUT of P&S. That way, entering medical students that know beforehand that they are intersted in ns would go to Columbia because of "in-breeding." But that doesn't seem to be the case. Columbia's ns program is very prestigious, but I don't see how this translates into sending so many medical students OUT of the institution for ns. I could definitely see it drawing many top applicants into the school if they were going to stay at the school or for residency.
During your 4 years of med school you aren't being trained as a specialist. How does the strength of your home institution's specialty program affect how well you do outside your home institution in that specialty, especially if you're a med student (not a resident)?
During your 4 years of med school you aren't being trained as a specialist. How does the strength of your home institution's specialty program affect how well you do outside your home institution in that specialty, especially if you're a med student (not a resident)?
They didn't match at Columbia because (at least for two of them) they were too busy matching at the top NS program in the country--Barrow Neurological Institute.
You go to a med school with a strong program in something because it will help you match at strong programs elsewhere. The world of academic medicine is quite small, so everyone knows everyone else. Your PD at Columbia can make calls for you to help you match, plus even without a call, his letter means a lot--a lot more than a letter from XYZ medical school.
Is it safe to say that the schools that have not published their matchlists at this point are trying to hide something?
I want to agree with you, but I'm still puzzled by this: If you look at Columbia's match list, all their ns matches were outside the institution. What you are saying would make sense if 4th year students matched INTO their home institution rather than OUT of P&S. That way, entering medical students that know beforehand that they are intersted in ns would go to Columbia because of "in-breeding." But that doesn't seem to be the case. Columbia's ns program is very prestigious, but I don't see how this translates into sending so many medical students OUT of the institution for ns. I could definitely see it drawing many top applicants into the school if they were going to stay at the school or for residency.
During your 4 years of med school you aren't being trained as a specialist. How does the strength of your home institution's specialty program affect how well you do outside your home institution in that specialty, especially if you're a med student (not a resident)?
Simply that no one at Harvard wanted to do NS this year.yet if you take a look at Harvard's Match List, there is little to zero matches in ns. How do you explain this?
People who are interested in a particular field will choose a school with the best opportunity to get recommendations, do research, and do rotations with the bigwigs in that field. Other factors will come in for the match; I don't think they would necessarily choose a med school with the hopes of matching at the same school.
I work at a university that is particularly strong in urology, and similarily, the med school produces more than a normal amount of urology matches. In that case, though, I would think it has more to do with those students finding particularly great mentors at their home institution.
Wake Forest University?!?!?!?!?
Columbia has this self-perpetuating mechanism where med school applicants who want to become neurosurgeons choose Columbia to match into ns. And then they actually do match into ns, keeping the mechanism alive and well.
By the way, I'm interested in ns but wasn't accepted to Columbia, so I won't be there to help perpetuate the image. But I'm sure there are plenty of other '11s who will do just that. In my case, I'll be helping whatever school I'm at later this year expand its ns image.Thanks for your replies.
I actually liked mechanism better, so I switched it back.![]()
Yeah, I have no knowledge about how P&S's ns program actually compares to other institutions, but I think the above statement is right on.
do you honestly think that its all smoke and mirrors? just a self-perpetuating system? Do you honestly think going to Columbia doesnt truly give you an edge for neurosurgery matching?
thats very naiive.
Columbia is the cutting-edge for neuro research. Ask any MSTP applicant interested in research. Students that hope to pursue neuro should go to Columbia b/c of the research oppurtunities and the ability to acquire recommendations from the top members of the field.
Note that I did not say that you cannot match well into neurosurgery if you don't go to Columbia. I'm just saying that there is substance to what some would hope would be simply coincidental.
do you honestly think that its all smoke and mirrors? just a self-perpetuating system? Do you honestly think going to Columbia doesnt truly give you an edge for neurosurgery matching?
thats very naiive.
Columbia is the cutting-edge for neuro research. Ask any MSTP applicant interested in research. Students that hope to pursue neuro should go to Columbia b/c of the research oppurtunities and the ability to acquire recommendations from the top members of the field. This would definitely help in matching ridiculously well!
Note that I did not say that you cannot match well into neurosurgery if you don't go to Columbia. I'm just saying that there is substance to what some would hope would be simply coincidental.
no no no. you need to read all the posts ... and stop saying i'm naive. the guy was talking about TOP ns programs, and why P&S seems to do the best among the TOP programs. and you would be naive to think that perception doesn't play a role in relative rankings among similar caliber programs.
Obviously, neither Cubbie nor I believe it's all smoke and mirrors. Please read some of the above discussion before making this judgement. Other schools, too, have great ns programs, yet have "off" years where little to zero of their students match into ns. This is where the self-perpetuating image comes in. Students go to Columbia with the intention of becoming neurosurgeons at a disproportional volume than other peer schools with "top-notch" ns programs.
I have a feeling that many MSTP students at Columbia are interested in neuro, and likely go into the field...
Is it safe to say that the schools that have not published their matchlists at this point are trying to hide something?
Many schools do not make their match lists public because they want to protect the privacy of their students.
Yes--Barrow is definitely one of the best! MGH, one of Harvard's teaching hospitals, is also considered to have one of the best ns programs, yet if you take a look at Harvard's Match List, there is little to zero matches in ns. How do you explain this? Also, I wonder if this logic applies to UCSF, which is also considered one to have one of the best programs for ns, or to JHU, another one with a superb ns program. All I mean to point out is that Columbia is disproportionately represented in ns even among its peers (Harvard, JHU, UCSF) with "top-notch" ns programs.
I'm surprised so many went into OB/GYN. Alot of other match lists indicate that folks are fleeing from that speciality.
Nope. My school's match list looks quite nice to me, but the PDF that they sent to all the students says something like "for your personal use only," so I'm not posting it here. If the school posts a version available to the public, I'll have it on here right away.Is it safe to say that the schools that have not published their matchlists at this point are trying to hide something?
Nope. My school's match list looks quite nice to me, but the PDF that they sent to all the students says something like "for your personal use only," so I'm not posting it here. If the school posts a version available to the public, I'll have it on here right away.
EDIT - to elaborate, our match list says this at the bottom: "Student record information is protected by the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). No information regarding an individual student, other than that defined as directory information, may be communicated to a third party without the express written consent of the student." So, please, people, don't post names on match lists. If it's linked on the school's website, then it's fair game.
does anyone have the Case Western List?
at vandy you can do ns if you want during surgery clerkship. is it required at columbia?Falcine, do you think part of it is also that you have a neurosurgery rotation during third year too? Yours is the only school I've heard of that does that, although I wouldn't be surprised if there were others. Nonetheless, it's hard to get interested in something when you have zero exposure to it, which is often the case with things like NS, urology, radonc, etc. at many schools unless you use up a bunch of time to do electives in them.
at vandy you can do ns if you want during surgery clerkship. is it required at columbia?
That'a solid suggestion. I'd be interested to know how many of their ns matches were MSTP. It seems like more and more these days it takes a solid foundation in research (nowadays a PhD) to match into a top ns program.
http://mdphd.columbia.edu/alumni/06-05.html
Keep clicking on the right. Last 4 years, no Columbia MSTP to NS.
http://mdphd.columbia.edu/alumni/06-05.html
Keep clicking on the right. Last 4 years, no Columbia MSTP to NS.
Thanks for the information, Doctor&Geek. Appreciate it. While there were no MSTP to NS in the last 4 years, Falcine, a current Columbia student, mentioned that many of last year's NS matches had stayed an extra year to do research. Thanks again.![]()
why aren't more people like you just going out and searching for them on the school's website?why arent more people posting their school's match list?