- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 295
- Reaction score
- 72
I've read every post on the forum about the top two machines for fluoroscopy guided pain procedures. I am still conflicted about the top two choices. Members have compared the phillips pulsera (which seems to be favored for image quality reasons) to the oec 9900 saying the image quality is comparable. The price difference however is huge.
Salesmen keep saying the OEC is on another playing field much more capable than a pulsera, and state that getting parts and repairs of major components will be much cheaper with the OEC since they have largest marketshare and ubiquitous Carms/parts vs no 3rd party availability with phillips, and buying through the company makes it much more expensive.
But has anyone actually had to replace "glassware" type stuff that is not completely covered by service/warranty package? How much were the parts?
How much better are the images on the pulsera compared to the 9800? I'm being quoted 60s-low 70s for used 9800 with basic package nothing fancy. Of course since GE stopped making the 9800s in 2007 these machines are pretty old and when buying one I could end up with a 2001 version. I feel like the pulsera machines one can find a used 2008 model for pretty cheap.
The neglected issues typically are 1)ease of use for someone like an MA 2)ease of replacements/cost of replacements 3)how often it breaks down these are things people don't too often discuss, focusing instead on image quality (for good reason).
I liken the comparison to a PS4 vs an XBOX One. The PS has much more power/ability but when it comes to playing a basic RPG game or first person shooter..they end up performing the same. I liken that comparison to simple pain mgmt procedures where all we need is to look at bone 95% of the time and the bells and whistles are wasted money.
Still, the dearth of information out there for the Pulsera and the fact that salespeople keep dissing it does concern me a lot.
Salesmen keep saying the OEC is on another playing field much more capable than a pulsera, and state that getting parts and repairs of major components will be much cheaper with the OEC since they have largest marketshare and ubiquitous Carms/parts vs no 3rd party availability with phillips, and buying through the company makes it much more expensive.
But has anyone actually had to replace "glassware" type stuff that is not completely covered by service/warranty package? How much were the parts?
How much better are the images on the pulsera compared to the 9800? I'm being quoted 60s-low 70s for used 9800 with basic package nothing fancy. Of course since GE stopped making the 9800s in 2007 these machines are pretty old and when buying one I could end up with a 2001 version. I feel like the pulsera machines one can find a used 2008 model for pretty cheap.
The neglected issues typically are 1)ease of use for someone like an MA 2)ease of replacements/cost of replacements 3)how often it breaks down these are things people don't too often discuss, focusing instead on image quality (for good reason).
I liken the comparison to a PS4 vs an XBOX One. The PS has much more power/ability but when it comes to playing a basic RPG game or first person shooter..they end up performing the same. I liken that comparison to simple pain mgmt procedures where all we need is to look at bone 95% of the time and the bells and whistles are wasted money.
Still, the dearth of information out there for the Pulsera and the fact that salespeople keep dissing it does concern me a lot.