@PerioDont and
@charlestweed I saw something on Reddit a while back that advocated for NO contracts. I'll include the link
here but I wanted to see what you guys thought about it. These are not my words, but I will quote the posts below:
"I am going to have a contrary opinion to this. I don’t quite understand why everyone here keeps citing seminars and whatnot on why contracts are so important. I haven’t been to any of these seminars but maybe I should start one…. Anyways, It seems like people don’t understand the economics of these contracts. Let grandpa LCdent sit you down and tell you how the world really works. For context, I have 5 offices and we do about 10 million. We are not huge but I have been around the block.
So the magic contract. A contract from a company is not what everyone here seems to think it is. It is not a piece of paper that protects the dentist associate, contracts are designed to protect the company and only the company. Here is why. The contract will say somewhere that you get paid 30% or so for the production/adjusted production you do. So let’s say you are a new dentist and your production is 50000 a month. The big bad company pays you 15000 for three months and then they stiff you your 4th month whereby they pay you 13700 and then the next month 12300 and then 9000. You then finally quit, you go find an attorney and say to them that you want to sue said company. You have a contract that says the owe you 30% but they didn’t pay up. The attorney reviews the contract and agrees. He says yes they will sue the company but he needs a 40000 retainer to do it. You don’t have 40000 and even if you did the attorney says to you that there is no guarantee that you will win and that the lawsuit will take a few years to go finish. The lawsuit will win you maybe 10k, the attorney may be able to get there side to pay for the fees but maybe not. All in all it will probably cost you 40000 to win back 10000. A probable net loss of 30000.
So let’s take another look from the companies perspective. You produce 50000 a month. After a few weeks of work you decide the company is terrible, my god you think, they have red painted walls with green iguanas pictures. It is definitely not going to work. You walk off the job without giving your three month notice. The company sues you for 150,000 in real damages because you broke your contract. They pay their attorney 40,000 and get back 110,000, but they are able to easily show that you should pay their attorney fees and so you really get hit with 150,000 wage garnishment suit. Now you have student debt and this lawsuit to pay for.
So the morale of the story is that the contracts are designed to protect the company from you. The bonuses are designed to keep you working for a certain amount of time so they can plan their growth. Everything is designed with the employers protection in mind. These people telling you that you must have a contract really don’t know what the hell they are talking about. You are way better off not having a contract, then you can leave when you want. I know that to the new dentist have that piece of paper brings comfort. It brings you nothing. Contracts are useful for companies to help them plan their HR needs. Bonuses lock you in. The threat of having to pay back bonuses that you have already been taxed on locks you in. You really only received 22k of that 30k bonus snd you already took it to pay down your student debt. Now you have to make 40k extra to pay back that 30k bonus. It just doesn’t happen.
People hear stories of dentists getting screwed by there corporate companies every single day. How many stories do you hear about the dentist suing the corporations for breaking their contracts. NOT A DAMN ONE."
And a post below that agreeing with those sentiments:
"This post needs more visibility.
I work with no contract. Paid production. Fair owner. I can walk when I want. No non compete. Any procedure I do I get paid for it within 1-2 weeks since I get paid on production every 2 weeks.
Even if he decides to screw me I at most lose about one week of pay which is 4 days. I hold the power over my owner, since I can walk at anytime, and finding a replacement is hard in my area - I hold all the cards and all he holds over my head is maybe one week of pay. People with contracts could give up a whole lot more than maybe a week of pay. (non compete, weeks usually months of notice to leave, payback and re-do clauses, and it goes on)
Convince me otherwise."
What do you all think?