Congratulations to everyone! I've made the decision to withdraw from Hopkins. I don't really post much, but I want to be transparent and share my honest thoughts below to contribute a little to the community that helped keep me sane
- it's going to be a long post.
While SLW was undoubtedly well-executed and enjoyable, I had to remember that it challenging to fully grasp the true Hopkins experience from just a few days. The sample size is small, and it's understandable that the students selected to lead SLW would tend to have a more positive view of the Hopkins experience. Nonetheless SLW made me hesitate for a second but I had to keep in mind that SLW primarily serves as a marketing tool.
These are solely my opinions, so take them with a grain of salt. Hopkins is undeniably an outstanding institution, and everyone who attends will undoubtedly excel. These only from my perspective which could definitely be wrong.
#1 is location. Baltimore does have a few charming spots, but they are quite limited. Even just spending a few days in Baltimore - I was beginning to exhaust the "fun things" to do there. Spending four years there might prove to be a bit challenging. Exploring the same museums or farmer's markets repeatedly can become tiresome. Additionally, I drove through some less safe areas during the day, and their proximity to the hospital and living areas was concerning. The extra stressor of having to worry about that is more impactful than I expected. As someone who grew up in NYC, Baltimore is much scarier. There is not much to do and it is unsafe... Moreover, the hospital has a shaky relationship with its community.
#2 - Culture. There does seem to be somewhat of a shift to improve the med student culture at Hopkins. But talking to a few non-SLW current Hopkins med students, there still are a lot of gunners. Every school has its share of competitive individuals versus more collaborative ones, but it seems that Hopkins may have a higher proportion of the former. Moreover, although the undergraduate and resident programs are separate from the medical school, they have a reputation for being toxic and overworking their students. That has to have some effect on rotations, electives, and the overall student experience etc. Maybe less of an effect on preclinical but when you are working with residents who hate their lives - they may have more affinity to perpetuate the toxic culture that they themselves experience.
#3 - Admin. While SLW was fairly student driven, which is a positive sign, realistically SLW's influence on Hopkins as a whole is limited. For more significant issues, the administration tends to be quite authoritative. There have been instances where student concerns or ideas were dismissed or significantly delayed by the administration. For example, one professor's lecture was quite insensitive and students brought it up to admin but due to the professor's reputation, the administration was hesitant to address it promptly. It took multiple complaints before any action was taken. Additionally, decisions like canceling med prom due to concerns about behavior seem patronizing and punitive. Med students are full blown adults. People might get drunk. Additionally, it punishes the whole class, why not just talk to the students or people that you felt were problematic? Why immediately go to such extremes without consulting the students first? Lastly, the absence of a free clinic. Many students have advocated for this and pushed for this. Admin's reasoning is that they want to be careful about how they are involved in their community. While I understand there are challenges with running a free-clinic, the admin at hopkins seems obsessed with how they are perceived (akin to the med prom incident - they don't want to have a bad image). They seem less willing to do anything that would potentially tarnish their reputation. I do think there are ways to run a high-quality free-clinic that would be beneficial for students and patients, but Hopkins is unwilling to put in the effort to do that. Reputation/image comes first.
#4 - Curriculum. there's some apprehension about the potential shift from Pass/Fail to tiered clinicals. it seems residency directors and admin are advocating for tiered clinicals, and students are advocating for P/F clinical still but based on the history admin tends to win over students.
#5 - Scandals. Scandals are unfortunately not uncommon in large academic institutions, but Hopkins may have the most with regards to their hospitals/medical practices...
#6 - Passion. When I ask students what they love about Hopkins there are almost always the same 2 answers - the people and research. At other schools students have more variety in what is special about their med school, whether it be research or service or faculty or the city. While research is undoubtedly essential, it shouldn't completely overshadow other aspects of medical education. I personally prefer a more well-rounded educational experience - where students can point to more than just research as one of the biggest advantages of a school.
Honestly, there are so many pros to hopkins as well like their reputation. But these factors to me were really important and convinced me to withdraw. Again, it's an amazing school and you probably can't go wrong with it. In the end, a lot of med schools are very similar and these factors are probably irrelevant to many. They might not even affect anyone or anything. But these were the things that I factored in! I hope this helps some! Best of luck to you all!!