30+ MCAT Study Habits- The CBT Version

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.

omegaxx

New Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
385
Reaction score
13
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=14 VR=13 WS=Q BS=14 Composite=41Q

2) The study method used for each section
PS&BS: Reviewed all the materials (except Organic Chem, because I just finished a year long O. Chem course and knew it like the back of my hand). Practiced.
VR: Practice, practice, practice.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
Princeton Review all the way.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
Princeton Review all the way.
I also bought AAMC 4-6 for building confidence two weeks before the actual exam.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Pharmacology & English, although I took the exam after sophomore year so I just had the prereq sciences and five English courses under my belt.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
Read smartly, and read a lot, not just textbooks and scientific papers and newspaper, but also materials in the humanities department.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
2.5 months (~10 weeks), averaging ~3 hrs/day.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score

June 13, 2014: PS 10 VR 11 BS 13 = 34


2) The study method used for each section

PS: Went through all of the Kaplan on demand videos. Then I would review a chapter in the Princeton Review Physics the day i take a practice exam or days after based on what piece of content I found difficult/was unsure about.

BS: Pretty much did the same thing as physics. I had just taken a physiology course so a lot of the bio was fresh in my mind so I concentrated on cell bio and orgo.

VR: This was all practice. When I did the practice exams i would use different tactics ( ie: highlighting, writing notes etc.) I found what best for me was just to read it carefully one time, no notes no highlighting


3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

Kaplan On demand videos and Kaplan Bio Book (didn't have the Princeton Review version for bio)
Kaplan quick sheet to look at the day before the exam and the day of, just to get my brain going
Kaplan Subject tests
Princeton Review for Physics, Orgo, and Chem
AAMC practices

4) Which practice tests did you use?

AAMC 3-11
Avg: about a 27 (9,10, 11 were 29, 31, and 30 respectively)
Kaplan Subject Tests

5) What was your undergraduate major?

Health Sciences

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Ideally I would have liked to study for two months. One for content and one for practice and doing a practice test every two to three days or so. I would suggest taking you last practice two full days before the actual one. My test was on a Friday so the last practice was a wednesday.

When taking the practice tests make sure to mimic the actual test day as much as possible including what you're going to eat for breakfast and what you'll have during your breaks. I realized that eating just carbs in the morning made me really hungry during the test so I switched to just an omelette. It's pretty anal, but you don't any surprises to throw you off. I also had a Starbucks espresso drink between each break for energy, especially before verbal. And most importantly, go in with confidence. The MCAT is meant to be an ego killer and for the majority of us it will be difficult, but not impossible, to do well. its really imperative that you don't worry about your practice scores or anything during the test. Just trust yourself. And when there is a difficult section (there will invariably be at least one) remember to forget about it for the time being and concentrate on the next section you have to do. The PS section for me was brutal, which was historically my worst section. So each break was spent be me just talking to myself and reassuring my self that the section was probably difficult on purpose with a tough "curve". Hope you guys all crush it!

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

About a month

Btw feel free to message me if you have any questions!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score
June 13, 2014: 11/11/11 = 33

2) The study method used for each section
Bascially Sn2ed except I didn't really do any of the passages in TBR books (they seemed overly difficult) and skipped EK 1001 books as I bought them but found them totally useless. Because I didn't really do TBR passages, my reviewing practice questions were quite different than most. After I did my TBR (Chem, Orgo, Physics) & EK (Bio) content review, taking strong notes throughout, I reviewed those notes, then took the AAMC SA, then AAMC #3, then reviewed it, and any topic I missed multiple questions in, I would watch Chad's videos on that topic before attempting another AAMC FL. If I missed multiple questions on the same topic on multiple SA/FLs, then I would do a third of that section's practice problems/passages in TPRH SW (I found them much closer to the actual AAMC/exam questions than TBR ones, which were just way too convoluted). This went on for the last month, then near the end I watched the remaining videos I had left from Chad before my actual exam. Before each FL and my actual MCAT, I would go over my notes I took either from the books or Chad's videos - this took about 3 hours, but after doing it 8 times, it really solidified minor things for me. I would also write any physics equations I used either during the SA or a FL down, and if I didn't have it memorized already, put it up in the bathroom or around the house and practice writing those out every single day up until my exam, at which point I had all of them down pat. See below for further information. Also, I'm a non-trad who is about 5 years removed from his intro classes and got pretty much straight C's in Chemistry, so I had to learn the Chem/Orgo/Physics basically from scratch.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
***TBR: Chem, Orgo, Physics [bought Bio but personally, I think you can skip buying this...]
***EK: Bio
***Chad's videos (1 month subscription used towards the end - do not skip buying these, they're brilliant)
***EK 101 Verbal Passages
***TPRH Verbal Workbook
***TPRH Science Workbook
***All AAMC FLs
***All AAMC SAs
EK Verbal Reasoning & Math Techniques
The Official Guide to the MCAT Exam (AAMC)
*** = What I would consider essential purchases. The last 2 helped me but aren't make-or-break...

4) Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC SAs (I took them twice: first before my FLs without reviewing, then again at the end for additional practice / to gauge improvement):
Physics: 68% / 77%
Chemistry: 76% / 83%
Biology: 77% / 82%
Orgo: 64% / 79%

All AAMC FLs:
#3: 10/9/11 = 30 <-- the "getting used to the computer format" verbal exam
#4: 11/12/9 = 32
#5: 8/11/12 = 31
#7: 10/11/10 = 31
#8: 12/10/11 = 33
#9: 11/11/10 = 32
#10: 11/11/10 = 32
#11: 11/8/10 = 29 <-- the "panic attack omg the real MCAT is days away" verbal exam
Avg: 31.25; 31.8 without the first & last.
I also broke down my scores for the different sciences as I progressed through the FLs, to see if I was improving based on the SAs:
Physics: 82%
Chemistry: 76%
Biology: 79%
Orgo: 82%

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology, although I studied a lot of Psychology & Art History out of personal interest.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
THESE ARE PREVIOUS POSTS ON DIFFERENT THREADS:
  • i will say, and this is me speaking personally because i can only speak for myself and aren't a MCAT expert, but the content review for me was ~80% of the prep - without it i would have been totally doomed. that being said, i am years out of my undergrad, and even then i didn't really learn the concepts, i was always more of a memorize and study what's going to be on the test type of student. had i just gone in and tried say the spinach method of just doing CBTs it would have been dismal results, but instead, by heavily focusing on content review (not even practice questions, but learning the concepts), i've been able to get 30+ on all my AAMCs thus far. i think that if you get the concepts down (my content review was roughly 2 months), then that pretty much puts you at a ~30 (depending on your verbal ability) - moving up from there is where the strategy comes in. only now, after finding my baseline (which was a 30 on AAMC #3 after my content review) can i focus more on improving the areas i don't know as well and honing my test taking skills. it's hard to say how good you are in a subject beforehand until you've seen the depth and style of AAMC questions (they're pretty basic but hit a lot of areas). after you're familiar, you can practice picking out correct and eliminating wrong options. i thought Sn2ed's plan was great in terms of how much time you spend doing content review, but for me, the practice questions you do along the way weren't as helpful, and you should start taking the AAMCs more than a month before your test date (and include the SAs along with that) - only after you have a baseline will you know how much you need to improve before your test, and you're more likely to be pushing your test back than forward. personally, i knew i was going to be starting a little more than 3 months out, and taking my exam early june, so although i've delayed it a week (and really didn't have to looking back at that), a full daily commitment to the MCAT has put me pretty much where i wanted to be (target score 34). seeing as you've already purchased the kaplan course, my only advice to you is put extra time in case you're not where you want to be with your baseline considering realistic improvement, and fully commit yourself to doing as well as possible on the exam regardless of AAMC scores - there's always room to improve especially considering the topics you get on test day will be a total crapshoot (seeing people who consistently averaged the same as me only to do much worse on test day combined with the fact i really don't want to ever think about any of this past june 13 has made this full steam ahead regardless).
  • i am about 5 years removed from my intro sciences, so had to start from scratch pretty much. after my extensive content review (with minimal passage practice, and even then i only actually graded maybe a fifth of that), i got a 30 on aamc #3 and am now at a 33 on aamc #7, so i'd say that personally content review was significantly more important. things like the heart i knew fairly well from my masters in medical sciences, but physics or orgo was pretty totally relearning the material. maybe if i had done more practice passages i'd be higher (a lot of my errors are stupid mistakes instead of not knowing the science), but personally i thought it more efficient to know the material front to back and let any questions i've missed be due to misinterpretation rather than a lack of background. knowing your baseline (ie actual score) and your target, plus going over how and why you got questions wrong will yield what you need to improve on, but you can't really do that without a real aamc score and material (self-assessment; guide to mcat). now when i miss multiple questions in a content category on an exam, i relearn that subject using different material. then if it miss more again on another exam, i go back over my notes and do loads of practice questions. that's at least gotten me closer to my target score (34).
  • i will say, i got straight C's in orgo, and it was over 3 classes at my quarters-based school (i wasn't the most motivated student but i did manage a 3.4 at a top 50 uni). i think i got 2 B's and a C in gen chem. that was 5+ years ago too, so i didn't remember a thing. having said that, after doing TBR really hard for 2 months of content review, i just took aamc #3 (1st FL after the self-assessments) and got a 10/9/11=30, including missing 1 orgo question total. while i realize that is a single practice test (and what most consider to be the easiest), i also have a month to improve upon my score, including actually memorizing the parts you can't conceptualize (optics, hormones, orgo rxn names, etc.), which plagued me on both the SA and #3. had i taken the kaplan diagnostic without studying, i would have managed maybe a 20, and that's including maybe a 9 in verbal (i was more gifted in the humanitarians over the sciences). content review --> official AAMC material --> pinpoint weaknesses --> focus on improving your deficiencies. you can totally do this. it just takes steady commitment instead of sprints - this thing is a total f_cking marathon. cut out all distractions and make this the focus of your life for only a little while. it's hours a day, everyday, for a few months, and with that, maybe you can actually practice medicine for 40-50 years afterwards. as much as people try to downplay its importance in order to keep kids from freaking out, these few months could determine the rest of your life, treat it accordingly.
  • i would say that the most important thing is total commitment. i didn't remember anything about chemistry/orgo/physics, so i've had to relearn pretty much all of it. for 90% of the stuff i've seen on the SA & #3, the concept behind why is more important than any specifics - the answer for every single question is on the screen in front of you, you don't have to answer the question, you just have to choose the right option. my undergrad experience was based on memorizing, especially considering most professors will largely tell you what to study for an exam, and exams being on bursts of information instead of all of say physics or orgo overall. if the book (TBR for physics/orgo/chem; EK for bio) isn't synthesizing the idea, check out videos (chad's at coursesaver for physics/chem/orgo; kahn academy for bio). i stopped grading my TBR passages because as much as everyone says learn from your mistakes, it just takes too long to read each answer - instead of understanding why i made a mistake, i just think i got too many wrong, i need to study this section again. the official AAMC material does a great job of telling you what areas you're bad at - you need to study those sections again. don't try to save money now - my undergrad & masters was probably $200k+, but without a good score on this, all that money and those years and thousands of hours isn't getting me out why i went in in the first place, and when i think of it like that, saving $100 on buying used TBR or $50 in skipping chad's videos just doesn't make sense. don't try to cut corners - everyone will make little errors in every exam, and those add up, so if i happen to get a passage in something i'm bad at (for me let's say optics), and i miss 3/6 q's there, that could be the difference between an 11 and a 9. take lots of practice tests - you might suck at standardized tests, but after taking 8 AAMC FL's, and the SA's, and loads of passages in the book, the sucking at standardized tests feeling will dissipate. obviously test anxiety is very real (i'm lucky to have the exact opposite: i studied 3 days for my GRE straight, took a practice test the night before and got 50th-ish percentile in both sections, only to go get 90th percentile on the actual exam), but you can't anticipate what might happen on the day of the real thing, you can only get yourself as familiar with all the subjects and process as possible.

    and remember - i haven't even taken this exam yet (i'm only 1 FL in actually...), but just click up to the top of the forum for the "30+ MCAT study habits" thread, and read those when you're bored of studying. as the process moves along, you'll build your own strategy behind what will hopefully be a good score. all my advice won't be any benefit if you are prone to massive panic attacks to the point where you can't breath in actual test situations, but there's really nothing you can do other than study & practice right now to get you where you want to be. if by the 4th FL you aren't getting the scores you want, just build up more of a knowledge base and hone your passage skills in a workbook. that diagnostic you took isn't something i've read anywhere on here is beneficial or worthwhile (and i'm on here a lot...), so throw all that BS out the window and heed the advice that hundreds and maybe even thousands before you have left on this forum. it's not difficult science (this material is so much easier than my masters, and that wasn't even close to a phd), it's just a lot of it at once. and finally, this is going to sound totally insane - i actually enjoy studying for this. after all the time i spent doing stuff that had nothing to do with getting into medical school (like studying for a history exam because it's a required class and holds as much weight in my gpa as something i might actually use) so i could apply to medical school, i'm in the home stretch to the point where i can taste it. compounded with that is the fact i actually understand the basis behind the core sciences finally years later - after getting straight C's in orgo over the course of a year, it feels great to actually understand it and see that it's possible to develop even your worst areas in the course of a couple months. i may never use it again, but there's more to "it" than paying $$$ for an undergrad degree and coming out with paper that qualifies you for a job - the romantic notions of academia > the reality of american universities. the content review is tedious, but understanding the subjects and seeing numerical results has given me steam on top of the fact that without this i couldn't do what i've wanted to do with my life since i was kid. if you actually want to practice medicine, the sweat of 3 months is nothing compared to the rewards of 40 years.
VERBAL ADVICE:
this is just general advice i wrote for my sister, this is her 3rd time taking the exam bcs of verbal, and she had never scored double digits in verbal before, but just got a 10 on an AAMC, so hopefully they work for you.

this is why i do, and they're very general ideas to try.

1. sit up super straight, 2 feet on the floor, silently moving your lips as if you're reading the passage aloud. this has to do with your alertness - you will vividly recall getting attacked while you're more likely to forget something while falling asleep because of your alertness due to the sympathetic nervous system. don't try to get comfortable and fidget - being relaxed will hinder your attention. minimally mouthing the words is like making them more than thoughts, which are quickly forgot, and more like things you've said aloud, which are obviously more distinct.

2. read slowly and fully comprehend the passage. if you need to reread a line that is the first or last in a paragraph because right after you read it you didn't fully understand it, do that. the most important lines are the first and last - they summarize the idea. the whole time you're reading a passage you should be trying to build an idea about what the author is trying to say. if you didn't understand a paragraph by the end, then you should only reread the first and last lines. you don't have enough time to completely reread sections of the passage, while reading or during the question process.

3. after reading the question, read the answers before trying to locate a part of the passage the answer might be. you'd be surprised how many times the answer is obvious, and you save the time that you might have spent rereading something you didn't have to. focus on words like NOT or WEAKEN as they change what you'd choose. cross out obviously wrong answers as you read them, but don't cross out all the possible answers except your choice - if you have to go back and review marked questions, you want to know what 2 or 3 options you trying to decide between.

4. minimally highlight. you should know the ideas based on reading, but highlight only specific names or examples throughout, never long passages. the point of highlighting is that if they ask what say Dr. Callum might think of XXXXX, you need to be able to find where in the passage he is discussed if you can't come up with the answer via recall.

5. build a stereotype of the author in your as you read. imagine it's man or woman, then fill in all the details based on stereotypes. the point of this isn't to answer questions you might find in the passage, but if you are asked an opinion question, and can't decide between 2 choices, go with what you imagine they'd choose. answering all the questions from their mindstate instead of trying to be analytical is much faster, while only sacrificing some accuracy.

6. don't sit on a question forever. if after a minute you just don't know the answer and aren't any closer to knowing, guess one, mark the question, and move on. you don't have time to go back and find every answer in the passage, rereading it every time. mark these questions, and when you're at the end, if you have extra time, you can go back and see if you might be able to second guess yourself. again, even at the end, unless you've only marked 1 or 2, you don't have time to reread an entire passage. some questions you'll answer immediately, some you'll have to go back to a part of the passage you can easily locate to determine, and a few you'll just have to guess. admit you're going to get some wrong regardless and focus on getting as many right as possible. 2 easy questions are worth more than 1 hard question.

7. only check the time once during the entire exam. after 4 passages, you should have roughly 27 minutes left. if you have 25 minutes or less, realize you have to minimize going back to the passage. don't rush, just be steady throughout. right answers on 2 passages that you get 80% correct and rushing on the last where you get 50% is better than getting 2/3 correct on 3 passages.

hopefully that helps. with this, i've gotten everything from a 9 on my first exam to a 12 on the second. this tends to be the section most people do badly on, and thus, from what i read, a good score in this is worth more than a good score in the sections more people tend to do well in. remember, it doesn't require any previous knowledge or studying, and the answer is always on the screen. you literally just have to read a page and answer questions about it. confidence and efficiency is key to doing well, not knowing anything in particular - minimize outside thoughts, especially about how stressful the exam is or passages triggering memories. as you go along believe you're getting 90% right and you'll at worst get 80% right, which is a 10+. you can miss 10 questions and still get a 10. if you miss 1 per passage, that's an 11. admit you're going to miss some and focus on the ones you can get right.

hmm, i will say, i once (just 1 time!!!) got a 7 on a EK 101 section because i missed an entire passage worth of questions (7 in a row...) - i didn't realize the entire passage was being facetious. if you find you don't understand the passage at all while reading it, focus on the beginning and ending of each paragraph / idea, and try to conceptualize it as an ideation instead of focusing on the body of the paragraph which is usually just support / examples. people tend not to miss questions on specifics that can be quickly found in the passage if they highlighted that example - the ones they're going to miss are interpreting the author's argument as to why he is even writing this in the first place. the specifics just support the idea. focus on the idea, and the single most important thing to do is to focus on the author's argument, from his perspective. if you aren't getting the idea as you read (again, the most important thing and why you're reading in the first place), then read slower, fill in the [imaginary] details more yourself (ie stereotyping the author), and reread the beginning and end of paragraphs / ideas / sections immediately after you've finished them. i was more talented at writing (which takes talent) than the sciences (which takes effort), and spoke english all my life, so if you're an english 2nd language or somewhat dyslexic, i can't make any promises, but if you can read and understand the simplified / stereotyped argument you've created based on the passage, i can't imagine getting below a 10 on the actual thing. the 1st score i got was a 9 because i found reading passages on the screen totally different after 2+ months of doing them in the book, but since then, i've been at my average in the books with minimal effort put in. realistically, this is the easiest section of the test (people who work with reading opinionated articles could walk in and get a 12+ no practice) - the only reason people do badly on it is because they approach it with the same mindstate as the science sections using their science brain (right / wrong; black / white) instead of their arts brains (which they might have underdeveloped). confidence (remember you can miss 10 and get a 10, which is only 75% correct); consistency (read slow & steady; minimize going back if you 90% confident); and conceptualizing (you don't need to memorize the passage, you just need to understand a majority (remember 75%) of it). do that and you should be getting consistent double digit averages.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
3.5 months, avg. 6 hours/day.

If anyone has any questions / wants quick advice, feel free to DM me. A lot of my score I owe to this forum and the advice of others on it, and I'm definitely willing to contribute to the collective good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users
1) Your individual scores (PS/VR/BS) and composite score:
30 (11/10/9)

2) The study method used for each section:

I'll preface all of this by saying I'm no MCAT expert. Many of you have or will have higher scores than me. But I picked up on a few things during this journey, and here is some advice for each section:

Spark Notes Version/tl;dr :
PS: Know all the formulas.
VR: Pacing (8.5 minutes per section) is key.
BS: Don't get bogged down with details, know the general concepts.

-Physical Sciences - Going into this section, a lot of you are probably going think it will be your worst (because a lot of us are Bio majors). But actually, it can be your best (it ended up being mine, and I felt awful about PS going in. It was my worst section initially). Focus on getting down all the equations and laws. A lot of times, if you know the equation for something, you can get the answer right.

-Verbal Reasoning - This section is arguably the toughest to improve. The key here is to do lots of passages and section tests. Reviewing what you got wrong on verbal is really tough, but it is worth the effort. Don't just skim through what you got wrong. Take the time and effort to see why you got a question wrong. As for tackling the passages, don't get too caught up in the details. Focus on the main idea and what the author's opinion or point of view is. Also, pacing is absolutely crucial. Don't spend more than 8.5 minutes on any section. As soon as you spend 9 minutes on a section, best thing to do is make educated guesses and move on to the next one. The VR is designed so it's hard to finish - you're most likely going to have to guess on some. Try and get those down to 50/50 shots and move on.

-Biological Sciences - The key here is to not get bogged down with all the details. There is so much information about the body systems, specifically. Just pick up on the key points. There are very few questions on the BS that will pin you down and ask you a super specific question. Most of the BS section is being able to comprehend the passage and using your intuition and logic to answer the questions.

3) What materials you used for each section (Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
I'd recommend ExamKrackers (EK). I took an online Kaplan course, and it was useful, but EK was much better for me (and a lot cheaper). It got more to the point (less thick than Kaplan), and helped me get better at just being able to approach the test and its questions. EK was especially great for verbal.

4) Which practice tests did you use?

Kaplan 1: 25 (7/10/8) - February 15th, 2014
Kaplan 2: 26 (7/10/9) - April 12th, 2014

AAMC 11: 30 (10/10/10) - June 4th, 2014
AAMC 10: 30 (11/10/9) - June 10th, 2014
AAMC 9: 29 (10/10/9) - June 12th, 2014
AAMC 5: 32 (12/10/9) - June 14th, 2014
AAMC 7: 27 (10/9/8) - June 16th, 2014
AAMC 8: 30 (12/8/10) - June 17th, 2014
AAMC 3: 32 (10/10/12) - June 19th, 2014
(Full Length AAMC Average: 30)

I recommend taking all of the AAMC practice tests in order instead of skipping around like me. In my opinion, the AAMC practice tests are the best to take, as they are very accurate indicators of what you will do on the real test (personally, my AAMC Full Length average was a 30 and I got a 30). Also, the later tests (specifically 10 and 11) have been shown to be most similar to the modern-day tests, so I'd start at AAMC 3 and work your way up in order, taking AAMC 11 last.

I crammed pretty bad right before my test. Do not take 4 or 5 practice tests in a week like I did. It's cramming, and you can't review each question and passage as carefully as you need to in order to fully benefit from taking a practice test. Ideally, you have set up an organized study schedule from the start, stick to it, and take all 8 AAMC practice tests somewhere in the last 2 months of your studying (0ne or two tests a week or something).

Don't skim through what you got wrong on a practice test. Use a whole day of studying to review a test. Read over each question again, even if the questions you got right. Go over concepts that you didn't quite grasp. Near the end of your studies, you will benefit a lot more from closely studying how the MCAT asks questions and how to answer them correctly than just pure content review.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biological Sciences

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Make a specific study schedule and stick to it. No exceptions. Not for anything except emergencies. It's so easy to lose the forest through the trees with this test. Don't get bogged down with all of the tiny details. Know the key concepts really, really well. At least, that's how I got the score I wanted. Granted, it's not a great score, so again, I'm not MCAT expert, but that's what worked for me.

Don't let this test defeat you. After all, it's only 1 test. I know it's a very important test. Believe me, I was having nightmares while waiting for my test scores. But I will say that you are more than likely to score right around (+/- 2 of your AAMC FL average). SDN is a great resource. If you have any other questions, feel free to message me.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

6 months (162 days). About 1.5-2.0 hours each day (total: ~300 hours)

My study schedule was extremely back-loaded. I goofed off for the first 5 months, and then really crammed in the last month. As I've mentioned before, this is not ideal, and you can get a better score with an organized study schedule.

My best advice is to spend a day making an organized and specific study calendar (on this day I'll review chemical solubility, on this day I'll take AAMC 4, on this day I'll take a practice biology section and review it, etc etc). Purchase an ExamKrakers book or something and break it down into parts on your calendar. Make a timeline for when you want to have things accomplished by.

Be specific and stick to that schedule. No matter what! Doing good on this test is well worth all of the effort. It's a tough test, but you can do it. I thought there was no way I could get a 30 when I started (I was scoring in the mid 20's to begin), but I put in the hours and got my target score. You can, too. Trust in yourself and your study schedule. Good luck!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Tested July 2nd, 2014

1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=14 VR=10 BS=13 Composite=37

2) The study method used for each section
PS&BS: Did 3 weeks of content review followed by 5 weeks of practice passages/FLs.
VR: I really slacked in verbal. Aside from the VR passages I did in FLs, I only completed 3 of the EK101 Tests, and both of the TPRH Verbal Tests. Looking back I really really really wish I had spent more time in verbal. My studying was weak to begin with, I didn't dedicate quality time to verbal to address my weaknesses, I just went through the motions thinking the timing would help. FWIW, I scored a 10 on my first EK101 practice and an 11 on my first AAMC verbal practice, so I never really improved here.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
TPRH (All but bio) for content + EK Bio for Content, TBR for practice (Finished about 60% of practice questions for each chapter). I also used some TPRH Science Workbook for practice too, if I had more time I would have finished TBR and TPRH SW, but alas I did not.

4) Which practice tests did you use?

All of the AAMC, **EDIT** I also used the AAMC Self assessment package, forgot about this.
Practice scores were (all taken after content review, but scattered with passage practicing)
32
35
33
35
34
38
36
38

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Chemistry major/bio minor.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
Don't neglect any of the sections. Stay calm during the test (easier said than done). Stay calm before receiving your scores (surprisingly more difficult for me than staying calm during the test). Realize that if a section seems much more difficult on the actual test than the AAMC practices, other people likely thought the same and the curve should reflect that. After my actual test, I predicted I would receive anywhere from a 9-11 on PS because I guessed on ~5 of the questions, something I never had to do on an AAMC practice test. Apparently things worked out because I managed to score a 14 in PS. The opposite is also true, I thought bio was the easiest thing I have seen and made educated guesses on only 2 of the questions (on a topic I had never even seen before, in any book or practice passage) but apparently I was overconfident (relatively) about the section or the curve was much harsher.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
2 months working full time. I was harsh on myself and only gave myself maybe 2 full days off in that time, and on my days off I worked anywhere from 8-12 hours. Definitely doable in 2 months, I would have felt a lot more comfortable with 3 months though (or two months without any commitments).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Before I begin, I want to stress to NEVER ever let your morale or confidence lower from reading posts on SDN. Use what you read in SDN as motivation or advice, but never take a back-step in your MCAT confidence from what you read online. Remember, this is the internet, so many things do get up getting overblown or exaggerated, or maybe you're reading posts from 0.1% of the MCAT test-taking population. Keep in mind that the average MCAT score is only around 25, and you can absolutely do very well if you put in the work.

I suggest just scrolling down to my answer to question #6, as these are where my tips are at. Everything else imo has already been said before in this thread.

I also realize that the MCAT 2015 will be very different than the 2014 version I took, so I'll try to only post advice that should apply to the 2015 version.

1) Your individual scores and composite score
June 13, 2014
Final MCAT Score: 35
PS=11 VR=10 BS=14​

2) The study method used for each section
Did content review from December to March during my junior Spring 2014 semester (Originally only planned for 2 months of content review, but school work/ extracurriculars got in the way)

Did a bunch practice passages every other day (except when finals rolled in) from April- May. From May to test day (June 13), did AAMC FL every 3 or 4 days and did post-game analysis the other days.

Something I noticed while studying was that I would hate studying for my weaknesses (in my case physics and verbal) and love studying for my strengths (in my case biology and ochem). I found out if you keep this mindset in mind, it's kind of like sharpening only one side of a double-sided sword. Come test day, only one side will be prepared while the other will perform very poorly. Therefore, as much as it sucks in the beginning, push yourself to keep working on your weaknesses until they become you strengths. When I kept attacking physics, I ended up looking at physics from confusing and rage-inducing into a topic I was fairly good at.​

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
Berkley Review for PS and BS
EK101 and PR Hyperlearning for Verbal

Here's what I think of the content review publishers:
EK sciences are very good if you want a brief skim. Perfect if you're low on time and want to get the general gist of the topics. However, I feel they are missing a lot more specific materials. In the end, it shouldn't really matter as I feel like your post-game analyses after taking a FL or passage will fill the empty holes in your understanding of specific material.

Berkley Review is WAY too complex for some topics. At first, when you take their practice questions, you'll be like WTF and get overwhelmed completely. But remember, BR is making you overprepared for the exam. This is good if you have a long time to study and like to be overprepared rather than under. The difficulty of the passages of BR are also extremely simialr to the real thing, so that's also a plus.

For verbal, EK101 is a tad bit shorter than the actual thing, but overall the quality of the passages and questions are very similar. PR Hyperlearning is pretty good as well. You cannot go wrong with these two materials.​

4) Which practice tests did you use?
  • A few Kaplan tests (the actual MCAT verbal similarity is meh, BS is decent, but PS is AMAZING. My MCAT was extremely calculation heavy, and I feel like Kaplan PS prepared me very well)
  • All the AAMC FLs

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology with minors in Chem and Computer Science​

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
The MCAT is going to be a struggle--but you got this.
We all love to see the results we want to see fast. Unfortunately, for the MCAT, this won't happen. Those posts of people getting amazing practice scores and MCAT scores? They work insanely hard. Maybe your asking yourself, how come I've seen some people study so much and still get lower scores than other people that don't study as much? The thing is that those people who don't study as much--they've either sacrificed so much or been working extremely hard even before they started MCAT studying. These people already have a lot of the knowledge and strategies down. In the end, life is fair. A good score isn't going to come to you easy. However, anyone can get a good score, as long as you put in the work.

Another thing. Only you know yourself. For me personally, I am a good test taker. My AAMC FL 3-11 average was 31, and my average for AAMC 9-11 was a 32. I was aiming for a 35. Even with those scores for my practice tests, I still knew I had a good chance of reaching of 35, even when I read all those posts on SDN saying your MCAT score is usually your average AAMC score. Why? Because I knew myself, and knew that come test day, I would perform better than I did in any practice test.

Also, never believe any thoughts you have coming out of the test. Come test day, your strengths will be your strengths. Your weaknesses will be your weaknesses. Coming into the test, my best subjects were biology and organic chemistry. My worst was easily verbal. After taking the test, I thought I absolutely did very well in verbal and bombed the BS and PS sections. I even remember googling one of the BS passages and finding the research article, and realized I got 4 questions in that passage wrong. The passage also definitely did not seem like an experimental passage, as I asked other SDN members, but they seem to get the gist of the passage and got those questions right. I was freaking out. I thought my score would be PS: 9, Verbal: 13, BS: 10, with verbal carrying my score. I could not have been more wrong. I ended up geting PS: 11, Verbal: 10, BS: 14. My thoughts were the complete opposite of what I felt coming out of the test.

As for test tips, here are some advice I haven't really read often elsewhere but really helped me out. I also posted these on various SDN threads. I hope these tips can end up increasing some SDNer's scores:

Useful Tips for the MCAT
    • Two nights before the MCAT, I purposely slept 4-5 hours. I woke up early and worked out, but not too intensely. After that, I went for a quick jog and then watched movies the rest of the day while fighting the urge to nap. This made my body super tired, allowing me to fall asleep earlier. This worked wonders when, on the night before the MCAT, I passed out at 9pm and woke up at 6am, giving me ample amount of sleep (9 hours) without any waking up in the middle.
    • Write down all the physical science formulas you have trouble remembering. Before you take the test, put these formulas on your phone or a sheet of paper and review them (depends on the test center whether you can read stuff before the test. If that's the case, then review them before you leave your car or house). This way, the formulas will be in your short-term memory. When you get to that 10min tutorial, dump all those formulas from your brain onto the scratch sheet. As our exam was intensely calculation heavy, I ended up being saved on two formulas with this method.
    • I remember there are two 10 or 5 minute periods (for tutorial and exam agreement/confirm your name) before the physical science starts. Use these periods to calm your nerves down. You're usually very anxious before the test, but I found once I sat down, my nerves started to slowly die down. I used 90% of the time in these two periods to calm my ass down even more.
    • This sounds really dumb, but it works. Train your bladder. You have no idea what could happen come test day. What I did was during my practice exams, I would drink some source of caffeine (as its a diuretic) then drink like 2 cups of water every break. This made me need to pee near the end of each section. In the end I ended up learning how to hold it in and focus out the urge to urinate. Also, always take the break to go to the bathroom. Unless you've been studying in the desert, 127 Hours style, then everyone is bound to have to go after a while.
    • Don't ever let your test scores ruin your confidence. Three days before I took my test, I got a 30 on AAMC #11. Although I was disappointed at first, I realized how lucky I was to catch these mistakes now then never. After my post-game analysis, I realized the mistake I made. And whadya know, a similar question popped up that I would have gotten wrong had it not been for AAMC #11.
    • Absolutely make sure you go over the topics lists sometime before the test. I never really focused on genes too in detail until the last week when I saw it was on the topics list, but whatdya know, our BS section had a bunch of specific genetic questions.
    • Whenever you feel unmotivated to study (except when you are burned out--then you def need to take a break), think to yourself this: would the 10-year version of yourself look up to how you are studying right now? Would he/she admire how much you go check Facebook or Youtube every 30 minutes? There's a difference between taking a break and relaxing too long, and you definetely know this.
7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
From December to June. I took many breaks due to being burned out and other school commitments.
I really only studied 4 months total. The first 3 months, every day would be anywhere from 2-5 hours. The last month, it would be around 8 hours every day.​

If you have any questions, feel free to message me. I will gladly help out a fellow SDN MCATer!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 16 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score

May 8, 2014: PS 14 VR 12 BS 12 = 38
First and only time taking the test.

2) The study method used for each section

First off, my strategy was to remove myself from virtually all other responsibilities for about 14-15 weeks (mainly February, March, and April) to focus solely on MCAT preparation. I had no classes. I had no work. I decided that I would give my absolute best effort to succeed on this thing and only take it once. I realize I was fortunate (and sacrificed a lot) to do this, mainly pushing back my graduation one semester. But I feel it was worth it.

I have a 4+ year history of undergraduate biological sciences coursework, including all the med school pre-req's. In addition, I have taken genetics, molecular cell biology, anatomy and physiology, intro biochem, medical biochem, developmental neurobiology, and comparative vertebrate anatomy. This college course history led me to feel very strong in biology from the outset. Not so much, however, in o-chem. It had also been four years since I had taken chemistry 1 and 2 and physics, however.

I began by doing a diagnostic test before any content review / learning. I used AAMC e-mcat 3, the free one, and scored a 28 with a 7 on PS. This let me know I really needed to shore up chemistry and physics. I decided to do this first and, after speaking with a few people at my school and reading lots of positive reviews on this site, determined the Berkeley Review was that good good super fly for physical sciences.

Physical Sciences: Berkeley Review. I spent a solid five or six weeks doing the four PS books (two for general chemistry, two for physics). These four books comprised 99% of my review and practice for PS (I did a few problems later from the Princeton Review Science Workbook). I did the BR books exactly as they instructed, however I changed my scoring scales for the end-of-chapter passages/questions as I determined their scales were way too lenient. Yes, I know BR is tougher, but their scales were a little ridiculous. I ended up subtracting about 2 from every scale score (so I could never score higher than a 13, which I felt was realistic). I did not use the Berkeley Review's other practice tests or review, though I'm sure they'd be great too.

I decided to take my biggest weaknesses and work my ass off until they were my greatest strengths. Nothing will give you more confidence than realizing you're really good at something you were previously poor at. And again, I see this mcat lesson echoing in life, pardon the cliché.

Verbal Reasoning: I used only AAMC fl passages (and a Princeton Review practice test) and a few "tips and strategies" how-to articles including this one:

http://www.studentdoctor.net/2012/09/best-methods-to-improve-your-mcat-verbal-reasoning-vr-score/.

I mainly relied on my fairly strong reading comprehension skills.

Biological Sciences: I used Princeton Review's organic chemistry book and ExamKrackers' book for Biology for strict content review / end-of-chapter practice passages and questions (and whenever I felt like Examkrackers Biology was a little lacking, I would glance at Princeton Review's biology book, but this wasn't often). However, for biology, I again relied mainly on my background. I really relied on Princeton Review's organic book to learn and re-learn o-chem. I also purchased a used copy of the Princeton Review Science Workbook, but only did perhaps 100 questions from it (and it has thousands). I also listened to Examkrackers' Audio Osmosis in the car whenever I drove anywhere, which was helpful for o-chem especially, and also biology.

Utilizing every AAMC e-mcat's material was crucial and arguably the most important study method overall. I planned on purchasing the AAMC Official MCAT Self-Assessment Package, but never got around to it. If I could do it again, I would utilize absolutely everything the AAMC provides. If you were trying to gain residency to Japan, would you buy official guides by the Japanese government first, before third party material? A terribly stretched analogy but yes you would.


3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

AAMC for everything chiefly and firstly. Especially the content guides.

PS: Berkeley Review. Listened to Examkrackers' Audio Osmosis in the car.

VR: Only AAMC e-mcat full-lengths and one Princeton Review practice test. See above. I mainly relied on my reading comprehension skills and once I saw I was averaging a steady 11 on the practice tests, I honestly neglected VR for the most part.

BS: Princeton Review for organic chemistry and ExamKrackers (and very little Princeton Review) for Biology. ~100 questions from the Princeton Review Science Workbook, mainly for 0-chem practice. Listened to Examkrackers' Audio Osmosis in the car, which was actually really helpful for o-chem and biology.

Again, for all three, the AAMC e-mcat practice tests were crucial.

4) Which practice tests did you use?

All AAMC e-mcat's except for #4, and one Princeton Reveiw test (one from an access code you get when you buy their books). I did e-mcat 3 before starting content review, e-mcat 5 after finishing PS review, e-mcat 10 and the Princeton Review test after organic review, then e-mcats 9, 8, 11, and 7 after pretty much all review (bio) was completed. I chose this order because of the semi-diagnostic nature / difficulty differences of each exam. I would have done e-mcat #4 had I managed my time better.

The AAMC e-mcats not only served as diagnostics (every one, for every subject, just at different stages of preparation), but also content review. Yes, the earlier e-mcats were easier overall (and contained PS sections which were a far cry from what I saw on 5/8), but I'm a proponent of taking everything the AAMC provides very seriously.

Test Date Score (PS/VR/BS)

AAMC e-mcat 3 (1/19/14) 28 (7/11/10)
AAMC e-mcat 5 (3/20/14) 31 (11/9/11)
AAMC e-mcat 10 (4/18/14) 35 (12/13/10)
Princeton Review (4/22/14) 23 (7/9/7)
AAMC e-mcat 9 (5/1/14) 36 (12/11/13)
AAMC e-mcat 8 (5/3/14) 39 (14/11/14)
AAMC e-mcat 11 (5/4/14) 37 (14/11/12)
AAMC e-mcat 7 (5/6/14) 39 (15/11/13)

AAMC e-mcat average: 35

What was your undergraduate major?

Biology


6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

I need to make this clear: I started with a 7 on PS on the diagnostic test, e-mcat 3. I ended up scoring a 14 on what was by far the most difficult, wild, bizarre PS section I had ever seen (the May 8th MCAT PS section). I guessed on at least 10 questions, which were pretty much 25%-chance straight-up guesses. I didn't even know if I had answered every question. And I got a 14. If this is not a testament to the Berkeley Review's physical sciences books, I don't know what is.

I also learned a few critical things, chief among which was the importance of timing myself. I learned to, before each practice test, create a timing sheet with guidelines, in such a fashion that I could easily replicate it on test day (once the test started and I could write on the scratch paper). I created it so that on the PS and BS sections, I would hopefully have six minutes to review after answering every question. So it turned out as:

Done with this question By this time (time remaining)
#13 54:00
#26 38:00
#39 22:00
#52 6:00

This helped me so much, mentally and practically. Just being cognizant of my pace made a huge difference. More often than not I would be a few minutes behind then only have two or so minutes to review, but simply knowing this while testing was huge.

Finally, if you can manage it, make preparing for this test your main focus while you can. I can't imagine trying to take classes or working or volunteering or doing extracurriculars or all of the above while also prepping for the MCAT. I know that's nowhere near possible for most people, but that was definitely a huge reason why I scored a 38.

Best of luck to everyone about to take the test. I'm not a genius. I have a very low GPA. I had a pretty-good-but-not-great SAT score. But I prepped as best I could and scored super duper well.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

About 14-15 weeks.

Forgive me if this feels like I'm plagiarizing your study methods, but I think I'm going to follow your method quite closely. We seem to have similar ideas when it comes to test taking strategy, and you have obviously put an immense amount of thought & effort into this. I've bookmarked your comment & will be referring to it often over the next few months. Thanks for the excellent detailing of your study methods! <3
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Thank you, and yeah go for it!

Forgive me if this feels like I'm plagiarizing your study methods, but I think I'm going to follow your method quite closely. We seem to have similar ideas when it comes to test taking strategy, and you have obviously put an immense amount of thought & effort into this. I've bookmarked your comment & will be referring to it often over the next few months. Thanks for the excellent detailing of your study methods! <3
 
@Alex Schmidt - Nice work on the test! I'm curious, when you say that the PS section that you encountered on the real test was bizarre, was that in terms of length of test, style (calculation-based vs. conceptual); I know we can't really discuss much about the specifics, but is there anything very general that you can say about it? Thank you!!
 
Test Date: 7/25/2014
FL AAMC Average: 29-30
Post-test expected score: 12-13/5-9/10
Actual Score: ( PS / V / BS): 32 (13/9/10)

Comments: I am a retaker from 5/8/2014. Previous score was a 26 (9/8/9). I used a compressed 1-month version of sn2ed's study program, which I will share here for anyone that is interested.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Books/Materials to use:
TPR Bio chapters 2-6 (molec. bio/genetics)
EK Bio chapters 4-8 (physiology)
TBR Organic Chemistry
TBR Physics
TBR Gen. Chem
EK101 VR
TPR Hyper-learning VR
AAMC CBT 9-11
TBR CBT 1-3

- I did 2-3 passages of VR everyday except for the last week.
- Make sure you spend time going over every practice question you do and really understand it. It is really helpful to go over the practice questions the next day, rather than the same day.
- 1/3 refers to every 3rd passage and free standing question (just like in the sn2ed program)
- I did not have time to do "hat-trick". I think it is a brilliant Idea though. If you do some searching on sdn you can find an excel sheet for it.
- I substituted EK101 or TPRH VR for the TBR CBT VR. The TBR VR is weird IMO.
- I retook 2 AAMC CBTs just to get comfortable with the timing. Take scores with a grain of salt.

This is a general summary of what I did:

Week 1:
M - Ch. 2 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 1 Orgo and 1/3
T - Ch. 1 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 1 gen. chem + 1/3
W - Ch. 3 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 2 Orgo and 1/3
Th - Ch. 2 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 2 gen. chem + 1/3
F - Ch. 4 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 3 Orgo and 1/3
S - Ch. 3 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 3 gen. chem + 1/3
Su - Catch-up day

Week 2:
M - Ch. 5 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 4 Orgo and 1/3
T - Ch. 4 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 4 gen. chem + 1/3
W - Ch. 6 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 5 Orgo and 1/3
Th - Ch. 5 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 5 gen. chem + 1/3
F - Ch. 4 EK bio (starting with the nervous system - skip over the eukaryotic cell stuff) and corresponding 30 minute exam; Ch. 6 Orgo and 1/3
S - Ch. 6 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 6 gen. chem + 1/3
Su - Catch-up day

Week 3:
M - Ch. 5 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam; Ch. 7 Orgo and 1/3
T - Ch. 7 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 7 gen. chem + 1/3
W - Ch. 6 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam; Ch. 8 Orgo and 1/3
Th - Ch. 8 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 8 gen. chem + 1/3
F - Ch. 7 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam
S - Ch. 9 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 9 gen. chem + 1/3
Su - Catch up day

Week 4:
M - Ch. 8 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam; TBR CBT 1 (substitute EK101 VR or TPRH VR)
T - Ch. 10 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 10 gen. chem + 1/3; go over TBR CBT 1
W - TBR CBT 2 (substitute EK101 VR or TPRH VR)
Th - Go over TBR CBT 2; Take any AAMC CBT (9-11)
F - Go over AAMC CBT; Take TBR CBT 3
S - Go over TBR CBT 3; Take any AAMC CBT (9-11)
Su - Go over AAMC CBT
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=6 VR=5 BS=7 Composite=18
PS=10 VR=10 WS=Q BS=10 Composite=30

2) The study method used for each section
The first time, I didn't study correctly. I trusted my content knowledge from undergraduate classes and thought I'd be okay to take the MCAT. But I couldn't have been more wrong. After my first test, I took a break from all MCAT things to focus on school for a semester. Starting January to July, I studied for 7 months by going through EVERY possible practice material I could get my hands on.
Moral: PRACTICE PASSAGES
I did almost all of the Kaplan Qbank stuff and section tests. I didn't go to the class sessions because I'm not a big fan of test taking strategies. I think once you get a feel for the test, you don't need to rely on them.
I also went through content more thoroughly. I know the consensus here is study for 3 months, but I studied almost everyday for 7 months (because I kept postponing my exam date) and it worked out.
The most important part is to work on where you are weak.
If you lack content, work on content. If you are a bad test taker, practice more questions and understand why you got it wrong. If you aren't reading carefully, force yourself to pay attention to what they are asking.

Physical sciences: The easiest section to improve on. Once you get content down, just continuously do problems for a couple of months. I used TBR and it helped me a lot. I think GS also makes you notice where you are lacking.

Verbal: Honestly, I have no idea how I got a 10. I usually scored a 7 or 8 on EK101 and the AAMC FLs. I did NOT do mapping. I paid more attention to the passage while constantly writing what I thought was important while reading simultaneously. It takes practice but I saw an improvement.

BS: At first I had low scores because I relied too much on my content. After a while, I paid more attention to the passage (as if it was verbal) and my scores went up a bit. Also, do NOT ignore Ochem. The questions on Ochem can be as high as a 3 point difference on this section depending on how many passages you get. That said, I didn't study too much Ochem, but I reviewed Chad's videos and did some problems in TPR Science workbook.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
Kaplan course
TBR for General Chem and Physics
TPRH Verbal (only the first half)
EK 101 Verbal (only the first 8 tests)
TPR Science workbook (I did all the problems in this book TWICE except Organic and Bio)
AAMC FL

4) Which practice tests did you use?
I took the first 3 Kaplan practice tests but I hated it because it wasn't very representative and had a strange curve.
I took the AAMC FL exams and I only scored an average of 25 on AAMC 9-11. I took AAMC 10 a couple of days before my exam and got a 29. That was my highest score out of all of the exams that I took. Since I had spread out my AAMC FL over 7 months, the actual average for all of the tests would probably be lower than a 25 because I was studying. This actually helped me get used to the format of the test in increments. This is also where I noticed that I wasn't really reading the passages. I was just reading it without analyzing it, and it took me a while to get used to it so it helped me this way, rather than do the AAMCs last.
I took GS tests...I took only 1-9 and I received an average of about 27 for the exams. My actual exam was not that calculative, but it helped me get down content and organize the way I analyzed BS passages. I replaced the Verbal section of GS with EK101 Verbal tests.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
PRACTICE PASSAGES
Also, like I said, I scored less than a 25 1.5 months before going into my test. I was really discouraged and actually looked into other options for my career. I really suggest that despite discouraging scores, those that are preparing for the MCAT will be optimistic and work harder. I barely did any content the last month (except for Organic chemistry) and just practiced passages. If I continuously got a lot wrong on one section, I would go over that passage and write down my thoughts. Also, it would help if you read the questions carefully because I made MANY careless errors on my practice exams that could have increased my score tremendously.

YOU GUYS CAN DO IT. I jumped from an 18 to a 30, and I never thought it would happen so it's possible for you guys too!

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
First exam: 3 months
Second exam: 7 months

If you guys have questions about the MCAT, don't hesitate to message me. I know the struggle, and I would love to help someone out as many have done for me! :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score

Test Date:
08/02/14 @ 8:00 a.m
Score: 33 (12/10/11)

2) The study method used for each section

PS & BS - For the first 4 weeks, I intensely studied purely content, dedicating one week to each major science area of the exam. One week for Physics, one week for Biology, one week for General Chemistry, and one week for Organic Chemistry (FYI - I used the Kaplan Subject Review books). I would do around two or three chapters per day and take good notes and do the chapter quizzes at the end of every chapter to make sure I understood what was going on. If you've taken the prerequisite courses, try to spend time on what you remember least, and focus on those things instead of needlessly going over something you are very familiar with. You want to get more exposure to these subject areas early on because they will come up over and over again, and the more they are repeated, the better you will be at remembering it when it matters. For example, I spent much longer reviewing electrochemistry than atomic structures and equilibrium. Every weekend I would then do a practice subject test, which forced me to apply what I had learned the week prior to passage based problems.

For the next six weeks it was all Practice Tests. I would do 2 per week usually on a Wednesday and Saturday at 8:00 a.m. to get my body and mind used to functioning at this time. After you take a test, it is extremely important to note why you missed a question. Ask yourself, what topic is this testing? Do I kind of remember it? Write this down. By the end of your test review you should have a list with at least a couple of things if not many things that you need to go over again and review them all over again. Reiterating what I said before, you will start seeing trends and things beginning to repeat. For example, on PS you're almost guaranteed to see something Electrostatic/Circuits, something on Kinetics/Equilibrium, and something on Newtonian Mechanics. Make sure you get down these subjects because they're juicy and meaty topics that the AAMC loves to include.

Also a side note - when approaching these questions, they are usually much much simpler than you think. Really try to boil away all the bull**** and get to the core concept of what the question is asking. After a lot of practice, you will build intuition and get better at doing this. So practice practice practice.

VR - Definitely the most challenging section for me, so I will do my best to try and explain my strategy. There is not really any studying to do for this section, just trying different strategies, tweaking as you go, and eventually finding a way to attack passages that works for you. Since Kaplan was the primary source for my study material, I first attempted the "passage mapping" strategy. I hated it. It wasted time, I never used the map I wrote, and left me frustrated quite frankly. I was averaging 8-9 on the Kaplan sections and wanted to get at least a 10 on the real thing.

So I perused SDN, and found some good strategies for VR, and decided to give them a shot. The strategy that I ended up using got me my target score, so I think it's worth a try if anyone is struggling with VR. I would first do a thorough read-through of the passage. In my mind I would set up the topic from the first or second paragraph, and then link every single paragraph afterwards back to this topic or to the previous paragraph. By the end I would have a "chain" of linked ideas, and could accurately locate details if asked. I would then go on to tackle the questions. You could usually eliminate any answer that (1) goes completely against what you just read or what the author believes, or (2) sounds very bold and certain. The answer usually ended up being something that sounds very "soft."

Take home message - explore and do some digging, find different verbal strategies, try them out, see what works and what doesn't, stick with what you are comfortable doing and with the strategy that gives you the best result.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

Kaplan Review Books

I should have done more than just Kaplan, I've heard good things about EK, BR, and TPR.

4) Which practice tests did you use?

Kaplan Practice Tests 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11
(29, 32, 33, 32, 34, 36, 24)
AVG: 31.4

I would stay away from Kaplan practice tests and use them only early on. I started with them and should've transitioned to AAMC tests much earlier. Also the content is much harder on the science portions leading to much more generous curves. For example, on one test I missed 13 questions and still got a 12 in PS. This is not how the real exam is.

AAMC Practice Tests 3, 4, 8, 10, 11
(33, 31, 33, 36, 32)
AVG: 33

The AAMC tests are the closest you will get to the real thing, my average of these 5 ended up being my real score on the test. The difference with these tests is that you have to be much more accurate to get a high score. A 13 means only 3-4 questions wrong. These tests are invaluable. Do all eight of the practice tests they offer, get as much exposure as possible.

5) What was your undergraduate major?

Chemistry

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

This test is doable, and in my opinion very fair and under your control (unlike the dumb SAT...) You know exactly what can be tested! Put forth a great effort, stay positive and try your very best and you will do well on this test.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

10 weeks/2.5 months
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score

Test Date:
07/25/14 @ 8:00 a.m
Score: 40 (13/12/15)

2) The study method used for each section

Because I was pressed for time, I decided to combine SN2ed's 3 Month Schedule and SpinachDip's Study Method in a span of 10 weeks.

PS & BS - Condensed SN2ed's plan to about a 5 weeks. That's right, five weeks. Each day was dedicated to completing 2 days of the recommended schedule. For example, my first day studying was committed to Days 1 & 2 of the 3 month plan. The only exception were the passage review days; instead of reading over all the chapters and doing the next set of passages, I reviewed my Anki flashcards and did the passages. I studied 5 days a week because my family wanted me to keep my weekends free. I admit that I was feeling burned out very quickly due to having consistent 8-12 hour study days. I was extremely lucky in that I had no other obligations this past summer.

For the later 5 weeks, I took a page from Spinach's book and did a practice full length every weekday, with a couple exceptions. I ended up doing 18 FL's: 8 AAMCs and 10 GSs. I would wake up and take the exam at 8-9AM, timed, and finish around 12-1PM. I would give myself a 2-3 hour break for lunch, and then post-phrase from 4-6PM. I would then review my notes and Anki flashcards, and head to bed around 11PM. Rinse and repeat. Again, I felt burned out very quickly, but I felt that at that point, FLs were more beneficial than content review. Once I was out of FLs (the week of my exam), I did a last minute purchase of the self-assessment package, and spent the next 2-3 days working out every problem. Honestly, this just gave me for more problems to work with, which was helpful because they were written by the company that makes the exams. Throughout this time, I occasionally looked up Youtube videos from CrashCourse to review concepts (especially physio) on a more basic level.

One note about the EK 1001 series: I hated it, because I didn't see how the questions could be useful or applied in passage questions. I started off doing them diligently, then gave up on the books about halfway through my content review. THAT SAID, one of the questions on my exam was eerily similar to one of the EK 1001 questions, and I considered myself extremely lucky to have remembered how to solve it.

BR Bio sucks, though I did like looking at their diagrams. It was just too munch information, and since the MCAT is gearing more towards critical thinking than actual content mastery, I would consider EK Bio sufficient.

VR - To be honest, verbal just sucks. I did about 6 passages a day, 3 from TPRH Verbal and 3 from EK 101, again because I was doubling up on SN2ed days. My scores didn't really improve until I started post phrasing and realized that most of my errors were from overanalyzing the text. Once I started doing FLs, I stopped doing extra verbal passages (just because I no longer had any more to use), and focused more on figuring out how the AAMC structures its questions.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

TPR Hyperlearning Verbal
BR Physics, Gen Chemistry, O-Chemistry
EK Biology
EK 1001 Physics, GChem, OChem
EK 101 Verbal
AAMC FL 3-11, except 6
GS FL 1-10
AAMC Self Assessment Physics, GChem, OChem, Bio, Verbal
Youtube videos from CrashCourse

4) Which practice tests did you use?

I alternated between AAMC and GS exams because even though I knew that the AAMC FLs were more representative, I also knew that GS exams were more math-heavy, and I didn't want to lose that skill. My exam results, NOT in order, were:

AAMC #3_34
AAMC #4_36
AAMC #5_38
AAMC #7_36
AAMC #8_37
AAMC #9_37
AAMC #10_37
AAMC #11_37
GS #1_32
GS #2_33
GS #3_34
GS #4_34
GS #5_33
GS #6_35
GS #7_34
GS #8_33
GS #9_33
GS #10_36

AAMC Avg36.5
Total Avg34.9444444
GS Avg33.7

TAKE THE GS EXAMS. You will do a lot of math, especially in the later FLs, but it is WORTH IT. I would recommending switching it up between GS and AAMC, so that you get used to both styles of questions, since the current exams have a math-heavy PS section.

5) What was your undergraduate major?

Health & Humanity

6) Tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Work hard! I was lucky and that the MCAT was my only commitment this summer. If you can, try to do the same.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

10 weeks/2.5 months
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=14 VR=11 BS=13 Composite=38
(FL avg = 36.7)

2) The study method used for each section
3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
Physics+GenChem+Ochem: TBR
Bio: TPR
Everyday was one new chapter / section, and half of the practice problems (every other passage) in TBR. TPR had very few questions, like 20 per chapter so I just did them all that day. Then I reviewed the previous day's material, and *took the other half of the questions (*this did not work out in practice.. literally half of my TBR workbook is empty). I guess one additional note I should add is that I used the old / unfinished(?) TBR physics. I found the latest release too late, and didn't feel like going back through to find the added material and practice. However, physics is a strong section for me (engineering background).

After TBR and TPR (this was approximately 40 days), I started TPRH. This was great practice and I divided the work up so it would be finished in 30 days, focusing on 2 subject per day. I prefer this to doing a little of each subject each day because I feel more focused and don't get facts and stuff mixed in my memory, but this could just be psuedo-science junk. I did not do everything in order. For example I would do every 15th physics passage + every 15th physics free standing question+ every 15th genchem passage + every 15th genchem free standing question (to be done in 30 days). I stopped doing this half way through, not because it wasn't working but because Iwas just wasting time flipping around through the book. If I could go back and do it, I would check my answers after each passage, rather than finish answering and then check them all together. This lets you correct mistakes and misconceptions quicker, and in real-time, as well as not having to re-read the passage to remember what it was about.

Neairng the end of TPRH, I began skimming EK. Didn't do any problems but just wanted to cement any gaps in knowledge. This was one book per day, but seriously not reading, just skipping sections I knew and then slowing down for the parts I was weak on (eg optics).

AAMC practice tests were done once a week starting a month and a half before my MCAT? Not really sure. I began studying 10 months before my MCAT date. So I think around week 5 I started doing AAMCs? I don't believe in doing one beforehand "to see where you are" so that's why I started so late. Last two weeks I did 2 per week. Did not take a day off afterwards to review, but simply did during the afternoon, or the next day after I finished other material. I also did not do the extended questions. I would do them if you have trouble with stamina, but I did not feel like tiredness was impeding my test taking skills. This was mainly because I could and did sit down for 4-7 hours at a time. Don't take breaks every 25-30 mins and you WILL get used to it!


4) Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC 3-11

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Chemical Engineering with heavy biomolecular courses (upper level molecular genetics, cell biology, intermediate physiology)

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
The actual MCAT is very different from many of the FL tests. I took my FLs in random order and dropped from 38 to 35 then back up to 38 (did test 11 last). It is very conceptual and similar to the last few FLs (9,10,11). Heavily conceptful, unlike some of the earlier and middle FLs (makes sense with my lower practice avg). The curve is much better...but test is definitely harder.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
3.5 months (planned to do 7 hrs/day, 5 days a week. Was more like 6hrs/day, 6-7 days a week). Did research in tandem, around 15-20 hrs/week.
Studying was not very organized (as you can see with what I dropped, vs what I wanted to do).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
I'm so glad I finally get to write one of these!

1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=12 VR=13 BS=13 Composite= 38

Little something about myself:
I think I’m good example of hard work over a reasonable duration leading to a good score. I consider myself to be a pretty smart kid, but by no means exceptional (I got a 1860 on the SAT).

If You Work Hard You Can Get Rid of Your Handicaps, but You Can Never Get Rid of the Person Your Handicaps Made You:
A few of my family friends tell me about their dyslexic friends who are struggling to enter the medical field so I’ll mention that I’m dyslexic too! As a kid I had a bunch of tutors, speech therapist, etc. to try to get me to become an average performer in school. Let my Verbal score be a testament that reading speed doesn’t mean **** and that if I could score well (99.7%tile in VR) THEN YOU CAN TOOOOO.

I think the good thing about being dyslexic is that it teaches you how to work hard and I think the kind of thinking style it bestows on us actually worked to my advantage on the MCAT.

2) The study method used for each section
I used the SN2ed 3 month plan. I often skipped the EK 1001 questions.
http://www.studentdoctor.net/3-month-mcat-study-schedule/

SN2ed was a great study plan for me. It is most challenging in the first 2 weeks, but if you persevere you’ll acclimate to it and make all kinds of gains… allll kindzzzz.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
All the SN2ed books.
PS: The Berkley Review (TBR) for days
The TBR books are awesome. The lectures and passages were great preparation for the real test.

VR: ExamKrackers (EK) 101, The Princeton Review Verbal Workbook (TPRH), EK Verbal Reasoning & Math Techniques
I preferred EK 101 to TPRH, but both are good.

BS: EK Bio and Berkley Review Bio books for the passages. I thought this was a great combination.
EK Bio: very concise, yet effective.
I had only taken Gen Bio and Genetics before the MCAT, but I thought I had a solid Bio foundation and that’s kinda what EK requires. After going through it a time or two and occasionally using the Interweb for supplemental information, I felt I had all the knowledge I needed to score well.
TBR Bio: Good for passages

The chapters in the TBR books are monstrous and go beyond the level of knowledge that is required for the MCAT, in my opinion. The good thing is that they have a s**t ton of passages ( Probably over 150) and that alone was worth it for me.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC 1-11: by far the most useful.
3: 33 (I started off scoring 10 in BS so it took me a while to acclimate to the AAMC tests)
4: 34
5:35
7: 37
8: 38
9: 36 (I practiced stressing myself out for this one and afterwards decided it would be better if I fought to stay calm on the real test)
10: 38
11:38
For those of you worrying over VR it might be helpful to know that I never scored above 11 on an AAMC practice test. When it comes to verbal you just got to stick with your intuition and let everyone else psych themselves out.


The Berkley Review CBT 1-7: I was glad I got these and my scores were similar to my AAMC scores.

Some questions in BS were specifically about details mentioned in the TBR books, but were unlike the AAMC questions. The PS passages were very good and in my opinion accurately reflected the type of questions the AAMC had. I skipped the VR for these because I read they were unrealistic.

AAMC Self Assessments: Good for extra practice.

I’m glad I did these because they are made of old AAMC questions which is always a plus for me. I found the score report you get at the end to be useful for pointing out weaknesses and it shows you the type of question you miss most often, etc. Overall, I would recommend these to a friend.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Westmont College: Biology

I go to a tiny, unknown liberal arts college so the following is for anyone from my school who might come across this.
In preparation for the MCAT I only took the required classes (physics for life science, gen chem, gen bio, ochem) and genetics.

Know Yourself, Know Your Enemy. One Thousand Battles, One Thousand Victories:
My 1st year on Potters Clay I got what I think was great advice on academics in Med school compared to at Westmont from a young doctor I shadowed and I think his advice applies to the MCAT too. The gist (as applied to the MCAT) is that the MCAT is nothing like the test you take at Westmont. In my opinion, the profs here are too nice. They will rarely (never?) try to trick you on a test, few questions are ever on a situation not from the homework or gone over in class and I think that simpleness hurts us a little bit on the MCAT. MCAT question are all about uniques situations and subtle tricks that differentiate between the 2 best answers.

While at Westmont make understanding your learning style your #1 priority. Westmont's a great place for it because you can always talk to your professors and the atmosphere between peers makes it easier for everyone to help each other. The doctor and I both consider ourselves to be visual learners that liked having a structured study schedule. I would recommend you test out all the well known learning styles and find the one for you. In my opinion, that is more important than your grades.

If you fine tune your learning style you'll be much more prepared for the testing variability found on the MCAT.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
You Gotta Want to Succeed as Bad as You Want to Breathe:
I got into watching motivational videos on youtube and I felt they helped me stay motivated and focused.

My favorites:





Float Like a Butterfly, Sting Like a Bee. The Hands Can't Touch What the Eyes Can't See:
Practice is everything. Knowledge of the subject matter will only take you into the low 30’s, the rest is skillfully applying knowledge in ways you may have never considered before. Get in the Test Maker’s head. They try to give novel experiements to knock you off your game, but they always test the same type of knowledge.

PS: know the equations and practice combining them in novel ways.

VR: I used the EK Verbal Strategy. It was by far the most straight forward and effective. I added in TBRBioaddist’s adaptations to it as well.
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/sn2d-first-day.1074344/
If you are running out of time in Verbal it’s probably not your reading speed, but your ability to answer the questions that is slowing you down.

BS: BS is rarely about just knowing information. Most of the time simply understanding the experiments will get you most the points and that’s what I focused on. Go and do likewise.

Only Perfect Practice Makes Perfect:
The weeks leading up to my test I began to do the same things every night and morning so that my body would be relaxed on test day. I went to bed at the same time after the same “late” night snack. I began taking Zquil because I tend not to sleep well before important events and I adjusted the dosage until I took just enough to keep me asleep, but I was alert by 7:30 am (8am test). I ate the same amount of the same thing for breakfast while drinking the same amount of water at the same time (because I had some pee pee problems during my first few practice tests). I drank the same amount of coffee and ate a banana during the breaks of my practice tests. During my practice tests (which I always began at 8) I experimented on different exercises to do during breaks (pushups4dayzzz). I drank the same amount of coffee and ate a banana during the breaks of my practice tests so that I knew how I would feel with the caffeine and how happy my tum tum would be.

I know it sounds like I was super anal, but I honestly believe that my routine made the difference between scoring my highest practice test score (which I got consistently) and dropping a few point on test day like most people do. For me, there was nothing really different about test day than any practice test day and I knew there would be no suprises. I knew exactly how I would feel: the excitement of starting, the bump from caffeine, the drudgery of the BS section. Everything was the same. Everything was normal. Taking my practice tests under essentially the same conditions as the real test let me preform at my highest level.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
"Greatness is a lot of small things done well. Day after day, workout after workout, beating after beating, day after day."
3.5 months, 5-6 hours a day.
580 hours total :)

Man, there is so much to be said about this test, yet I don’t want to take too much of your time. Please PM me if you have any questions or want me to clear something up.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
I'm so glad I finally get to write one of these!

1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=12 VR=13 BS=13 Composite= 38

Little something about myself:
I think I’m good example of hard work over a reasonable duration leading to a good score. I consider myself to be a pretty smart kid, but by no means exceptional (I got at 1860 on the SAT).

If you work hard you can get rid of your handicaps, but you can never get rid of the person your handicaps made you:
A few of my family friends tell me about their dyslexic friends who are struggling to enter the medical field so I’ll mention that I’m dyslexic too! As a kid I had a bunch of tutors, speech therapist, etc. to try to get me to become an average performer in school. Let my Verbal score be a testament that reading speed doesn’t mean **** and that if I could score well (the 99.7%tile) THEN YOU CAN TOOOOO.

I think the good thing about being dyslexic is that it teaches you how to work hard and I think the kind of thinking style it bestows on us actually worked to my advantage on the MCAT.

2) The study method used for each section
I used the SN2ed 3 month plan. I often skipped the EK 1001 questions.
http://www.studentdoctor.net/3-month-mcat-study-schedule/

SN2ed was a great study plan for me. It is most challenging in the first 2 weeks, but if you persevere you’ll acclimate to it and make all kinds of gains… allll kindzzzz.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
All the SN2ed books.
PS: The Berkley Review (TBR) for days
The TBR books are awesome. The lectures and passages were great preparation for the real test.

VR: ExamKrackers (EK) 101, The Princeton Review Verbal Workbook (TPRH), EK Verbal Reasoning & Math Techniques
I preferred EK 101 to TPRH, but both are good.

BS: EK Bio and Berkley Review Bio books for the passages. I thought this was a great combination.
EK Bio: very concise, yet effective.
I had only taken Gen Bio and Genetics before the MCAT, but I thought I had a solid Bio foundation and that’s kinda what EK requires. After going through it a time or two and occasionally using the Interweb for supplemental information, I felt I had all the knowledge I needed to score well.
TBR Bio: Good for passages

The chapters in the TBR books are monstrous and go beyond the level of knowledge that is required for the MCAT, in my opinion. The good thing is that they have a s**t ton of passages ( Probably over 150) and that alone was worth it for me.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC 1-11: by far the most useful.
3: 33 (I started off scoring 10 in BS so it took me a while to acclimate to the AAMC tests)
4: 34
5:35
7: 37
8: 38
9: 36 (I practiced stressing myself out for this one and afterwards decided it would be better if I fought to stay calm on the real test)
10: 38
11:38
For those of you worrying over VR it might be helpful to know that I never scored above 11 on an AAMC practice test. When it comes to verbal you just got to stick with your intuition and let everyone else psych themselves out.


The Berkley Review CBT 1-7: I was glad I got these and my scores were similar to my AAMC scores.

Some questions in BS were specifically about details mentioned in the TBR books, but were unlike the AAMC questions. The PS passages were very good and in my opinion accurately reflected the type of questions the AAMC had. I skipped the VR for these because I read they were unrealistic.

AAMC Self Assessments: Good for extra practice.

I’m glad I did these because they are made of old AAMC questions which is always a plus for me. I found the score report you get at the end to be useful for pointing out weaknesses and it shows you the type of question you miss most often, etc. Overall, I would recommend these to a friend.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Westmont College: Biology

I go to a tiny, unknown liberal arts college so the following is for anyone from my school who might come across this.
In preparation for the MCAT I only took the required classes (physics for life science, gen chem, gen bio, ochem) and genetics. That being said, I felt Westmont prepared me very well to take the MCAT. If you work hard in your prereqs and focus on truly understanding your course work and you’ll do dandily.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
You Gotta Want to Succeed as Bad as You Want to Breathe:
I got into watching motivational videos on youtube and I felt they helped me stay motivated and focused.

My favorites:






Know Yourself, Know Your Enemy. One Thousand Battles, One Thousand Victories:
Practice is everything. Knowledge of the subject matter will only take you into the low 30’s, the rest is skillfully applying knowledge in ways you may have never considered before. Get in the Test Maker’s head. They try to give novel experiements to knock you off your game, but they always test the same type of knowledge.

PS: know the equations and practice combining them in novel ways.

VR: I used the EK Verbal Strategy. It was by far the most straight forward and effective. I added in TBRBioaddist’s adaptations to it as well.
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/sn2d-first-day.1074344/
If you are running out of time in Verbal it’s probably not your reading speed, but your ability to answer the questions that is slowing you down.

BS: BS is rarely about just knowing information. Most of the time simply understanding the experiments will get you most the points and that’s what I focused on. Go and do likewise.

Only Perfect Practice Makes Perfect:
The weeks leading up to my test I began to do the same things every night and morning so that my body would be relaxed on test day. I went to bed at the same time after the same “late” night snack. I began taking Zquil because I tend not to sleep well before important events and I adjusted the dosage until I took just enough to keep me asleep, but I was alert by 7:30 am (8am test). I ate the same amount of the same thing for breakfast while drinking the same amount of water at the same time (because I had some pee pee problems during my first few practice tests). I drank the same amount of coffee and ate a banana during the breaks of my practice tests. During my practice tests (which I always began at 8) I experimented on different exercises to do during breaks (pushups4dayzzz). I drank the same amount of coffee and ate a banana during the breaks of my practice tests so that I knew how I would feel with the caffeine and how happy my tum tum would be.

I know it sounds like I was super anal, but I honestly believe that my routine made the difference between scoring my highest practice test score (which I got consistently) and dropping a few point on test day like most people do. For me, there was nothing really different about test day than any practice test day and I knew there would be no suprises. I knew exactly how I would feel: the excitement of starting, the bump from caffeine, the drudgery of the BS section. Everything was the same. Everything was normal. Taking my practice tests under essentially the same conditions as the real test let me preform at my highest level.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

3.5 months, 5-6 hours a day.

Man, there is so much to be said about this test, yet I don’t want to take too much of your time. Please PM me if you have any questions or want me to clear something up.

Wonderfully executed Hodge quote. Congrats on a great score!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score

Test Date:
08/21/14 @ 1:00 p.m
Score: 30 (10/10/10)

2) The study method used for each section

PS:
The first month, I started EK in physics and chemistry and it was a great refreshment. Then I used the SN2 schedule, but I thought it was too long, so I more or less followed it by doing the assigned readings and practice questions. This was my strongest section, but unfortunately it was the hardest in my test and finished in a hurry.

Verbal:

I did 2 passages every day (except my day off) timed at 16 minutes from EK 101. However, I did skip many days but never went more than 2 days without doing verbal. On good days, I got almost all perfect, other days I got almost half wrong. The more I practiced, the less time I needed. For the last month, I kept doing 3 or 4 passages timed for 23 or 28 minutes. Thankfully on test day, it was one of my good days and achieved a personal best AAMC score.

BS:
A big note is that I absolutely suck at O-chem. I literally gave up on trying to learn it and just memorized the functional groups and other common groups and names. I used the extra time for biology, which seemed to help me better. On the last two weeks before the test, I focused mainly on biology to gain more knowledge. It seemed to work for me, since on test day, I tied a personal best AAMC score.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

BR Physics, Gen Chemistry, O-Chemistry
EK Biology
EK 1001 Physics, GChem, OChem (only to improve my weak areas)
EK 101 Verbal
AAMC FL 3-11
GS FL 1-10
AAMC Self Assessment Physics, GChem, OChem, Bio

4) Which practice tests did you use?

I started with some AAMC and then switched to GS exams to get more practice. Since the AAMC tests are more representative, I left some of them to complete during and after I had finished all the GS tests. I also tried out some Kaplan ones.

98672t.png


GS exams are a great practice. I think leaving some AAMC's after the GS was a great idea, since it helped me get used to the "AAMC style test format" and ready for the real MCAT.

5) What was your undergraduate major?

Biology

6) Tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Never give up and don't be disappointed by bad practice scores. Learn from your mistakes. It's better to get it wrong in practice than on the real MCAT!
The more practice tests, the better. What helped me best was learning from the practice tests and "training my brain" to get used to the 4 hour long exam.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

20 weeks/4 months
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
1) V 13 PS 14 BS 14 / Composite 41
2) Read review books listed in 3, rotating subjects each day. did practice exams (approx half of them) at the end of each chapter. Verbal was daily practice of a few passages.
3) Examkrackers for Bio, Berkeley Review for Chem/Phys/Orgo, Princeton Hyper for Verbal.
4) All AAMC practice tests for full length practices. Berk Review for subject specific practices.
5) Undergrad major in Neuroscience
6) Practice verbal daily, and do not get behind on anything once you set up a schedule. Cramming twice the usual amount of material into a day = remembering a lot less.
7) 3 months, while also enrolled in a 25hr/week physics course. Probably averaged 3-4 hours per day of prep.
 
1) V 13 PS 14 BS 14 / Composite 41
2) Read review books listed in 3, rotating subjects each day. did practice exams (approx half of them) at the end of each chapter. Verbal was daily practice of a few passages.
3) Examkrackers for Bio, Berkeley Review for Chem/Phys/Orgo, Princeton Hyper for Verbal.
4) All AAMC practice tests for full length practices. Berk Review for subject specific practices.
5) Undergrad major in Neuroscience
6) Practice verbal daily, and do not get behind on anything once you set up a schedule. Cramming twice the usual amount of material into a day = remembering a lot less.
7) 3 months, while also enrolled in a 25hr/week physics course. Probably averaged 3-4 hours per day of prep.

With a score of 41, I would have LOVED a more detailed 30+ post :(

Congrats anyways!
 
Cant believe I get to post in this thread (even though with the new mcat it will soon be obsolete...)!

1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=14 VR=11 WS=Q BS=14 Composite=39

2) The study method used for each section
I followed Sn2ed's core schedule. However, I did not use the "hat trick" or EK1001 books.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
First went through all of the BR books for the BS/PS topics. Felt a little rusty on a couple PS topics, which I went back over with EK or Princeton review books pdfs i found online.

I felt like the Berkeley Review bio book was useless for me. After finishing bio content review, I went through the entire EK biology book as if i was doing content review for the first time over the course of the last month.

For Verbal, straight sn2ed.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
All available aamc fl's. Average score = 37.6

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Chemistry major, math minor. Physical sciences are my strong suit, I was *almost* bummed not to get a 15 on the PS. Took the exam summer after my junior year, during which I completed a very in-depth graduate level biochem class- that class is the only reason I did well on the BS section (AP'd out of biology). I had stayed sharp with physics, gen chem, and o chem from tutoring them pretty regularly since my freshman/sophomore year.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
Practice exams are definitely the most important. Take them like the real test, not only because they will familiarize you with the exam, but will help build confidence which is critical on test day.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
about 3 months, averaging around 2-3 hours a day
 
@Thoroughbred_Med I can answer any specific questions you have, I just didn't want to dump a text wall.

One bit of advice I forgot: Don't try to treat the answers to Verbal questions in the same way you would a science section. For science, my approach was often to eliminate answers by thinking/stating a reason it cannot be right (along the lines of Choice B doesn't make sense because Passage Hypothesis 2 would predict an increase in X, not in Y). Taking this approach in Verbal will lead to a lot of second guessing and wasted time, because there often aren't clear-cut reasons you can list from the passage. Instead, you need to do daily practice until your intuition gets very strong and you start to think in generalities like "this answer seems to take too strong a stance, I don't see how X is totally disproved by Y, it just isn't supported".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score. 38. 14P, 11V, 13 B

2) The study method used for each section.

Physical: I basically skimmed through the Berkeley Review books for Gen Chem and Physics and did some of their questions. Everytime I ran into something I didn't know, or got a question wrong, I marked it down in a notebook. Then I thoroughly investigated the question and wrote it down on an index card with a detailed answer. Then I went back and attacked that topic until I could spit out any possible question type relating to that topic and how to answer it.

Verbal: Practice, Practice Practice. The EK Verbal 101 book was my best friend. Started out doing 1 or 2 passages a day, timed. I found that it was not a good comparison to the real thing after I took my first practice tests. I started doing full tests. I reviewed ~ 4 -5 of them in completion, going over questions and answer choices. This helped me zero in on the faults I was making.

Biological: EK All Day. The EK Bio book is written very well, and the tests in the back were great. I also used EK 1001 Bio book, which was great practice. For organic, I mainly skimmed the EK book and did a few passages. I was really into organic when I took it in undergrad so I didn't need much.

I cannot stress enough the importance of the practice tests. They were invaluable in acclimatizing me to the question styles.

3) What materials you used for each section.

Physical: The Berkeley Review
Biological: Exam Krackers
Verbal: Exam Krackers

4) Which practice tests did you use? Every AAMC FL, and every Berkeley Review CBT. I attribute my good score to these practice tests.
I started out scoring 26 on my first practices, and spent the first 1.5 months of studying hoping to get a 30. Then with 5 weeks left to go before my tests, after two 29's and a 31, I hit a 36 on a TBR test after two weeks with solid hard studying. 3 days later I took a full length AAMC - 36. I kept taking tests every 3rd day until my test after that point. I had saved many of my AAMC's for the end because I wanted to really get into the flow of taking the test before the real thing. I ended up realizing I would run out of AAMC's at that pace, so I bought the Berkeley tests and did those. I saved 3 AAMC's for the last ~ 10 days before the test. I never hit higher than a 38, and never lower than a 35, after I got that 36 on the TBR test. I took one Kaplan test and it really did not resemble the AAMC's or the Berkeley. Gave me a bad taste of their material and I never went back.

5) What was your undergraduate major? Biology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us? Take as many practice tests as you can and devour every aspect of them. The test is beatable. With enough time and energy, you can learn the test and be prepared to answer any question they give you. Learn to anticipate questions as you read, and get a feel for what the correct answer should include before you look at the choices. PM with any questions if you have.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT? 3 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I've been spending the last month celebrating, but I am finally ready to get down, get serious, and get you all some tips on how to get 30+.

1) Your individual scores and composite score

PS=12, VR=11, BS=12. Composite=35

2) The study method used for each section (kind of combined 2 and 3, will summarize in next section)

SDN confessional: against everybody's advice, I chose to take the MCAT before taking ANY physics courses (none. not even in high school. zero physics experience)--so I spent a lot of time on physics.

I highly suggest taking a kaplan course or following a kaplan routine (i.e. couple days of physics, couple days of g-chem, couple days of verbal, etc. - alternating every couple days to a different topic so you dont get burnt out)
I have my study materials concisely listed in the next section, but here's the breakdown for what I did and with each material:

Physics:
  • Kaplan: I read the review book and did end of chapter questions all the way through early into my studying and then again as I went through my kaplan course. Do the section tests and topical tests as assigned OR as you go through the material yourself. Section tests will help you a LOT for the more difficult physics/gchem passages... I think I did 5-7 total.
  • ExamKrackers: skimmed review book, 1001 questions (not all 1001. did maybe 100? 150?)--as needed
  • TBR: actually intense read the review book, did the end of chapter questions as I went along. I would say if you have a good grasp on physics from the get-go you can skip the EK and Kaplan and go straight to TBR. Their end of chapter questions definitely prepped me for the PS section.
General Chemistry:
  • Kaplan: same as kaplan routine for physics.
  • EK: skimmed review book, read chapters where I needed more clarification
Biology:
  • Kaplan: same kaplan routine; FOCUS ON THE SECTION TESTS!!! They give you a glimpse at the experimental passages that are oh-so-rampant on the real thing.
  • EK: read review book where I needed more clarification, all questions in 1001 book that were NOT passage based
Orgo:
  • Kaplan: same kaplan routine
Verbal Reasoning:
  • Get ready for this. I only used Kaplan (horrified gasps resound around the room). I took the kaplan review book and did one passage out of the end of the book practice tests each day almost and used the kaplan passage map method.
Unlike some others, I took practice tests basically throughout my studying once I was half done with review. Started out doing one a week and then sped it up to one every few days.

Altered study schedule: the final countdown
Of course, things got real as test day approached. My week leading up to the mcat looked like this (each bulletpoint is a day):
  • 3 BS section tests
  • AAMC 10
  • 3 VR section tests
  • AAMC 11
  • 3 PS section tests
  • break
  • TEST DAY
with supplemental reading interspersed where I realized I didn't know something as well as I thought. On my break day before the test, I didn't open any books or even talk about the MCAT.


3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

PS:
  • Physics: Kaplan, TBR, EK
  • G-Chem: Kaplan, EK
BS:
  • Bio: Kaplan, EK
  • Orgo: Kaplan
VR:
  • Kaplan

4) Which practice tests did you use?

Kaplan 1-6, AAMC 3-11.
  • Kaplan 1: 33
  • Kaplan 2: 33
  • Kaplan 3: 33
  • AAMC 3: 33
  • Kaplan 4: 33
  • AAMC 4: 35
  • Kaplan 5: 36
  • AAMC 5: 36
  • Kaplan 6: 38
  • AAMC 7: 36
  • AAMC 8: 31
  • AAMC 9: 34
  • AAMC 10: 35
  • AAMC 11: 30
in addition, I did the usual kaplan baseline before ANY studying... 23 (7/7/9). Don't let kaplan scare you. I went up 12 points.

5) What was your undergraduate major?

Bio, minor in chem. Relevant science coursework beyond prereqs was genetics, cell molec, and comparative physiology.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Take one break day a week. Have a plan for each day, even if you have to buy one of those calendars and plan out your week/month. To do lists are your friend. I took 2 mini vacations in the 3 weeks leading up to the test and it helped my mental health greatly.


7) How long did you study for the MCAT?


a little less than 3 months. had a kaplan course twice a week. spent anywhere between 2-5 hours a day, excluding break day once a week.

GOOD LUCK
 
Last edited:
1) Your individual scores and composite score
July 11: 25-8P-8V-9B
Sept. 4: 31-10P-8V-13B

2) The study method used for each section
-Took the TPR live online class and EK (Classes are a TOTAL waste, don't do it!!!!!!)
-Second time I took it I didn't use the class at all and just learned from the book and made another pass through everything.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
Physics-TPR
Chem-TPR
Org-TPR
Bio-TPR and EK

4) Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC 10: 25 (pretest in late Jan, TPR has you do this)
AAMC 3: 28 (June-ish)
AAMC 5: 30 (July 5)
AAMC 7: 31
AAMC 8: 31
Won't even bother posting my TPR Tests (it's depressing) :scared:

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
-After my retake I felt like crap so I immediately started sn2ed schedule (I had the resources from a friend) (used BR Bio instead of EK) and felt like it was a lot better than some EK and TPR stuff I read, albeit, this may have been because I was now a 3rd and 4th pass through the information. Did this until I got my score back from my retake.
-I personally need to pound the information in to remember it, so I think I would have been served better by many passes through the information with lots of passages and problems each time.
-Kicking myself now, but wish I had just done sn2ed's schedule over the summer and taken the test just once.
-I liked Bio and hence my 13. I should have concentrated on PS a lot more than I did. That being said, EK Bio doesn't have enough detail in it and I had multiple questions on my test that I wouldn't have known without my major or PR. I thought the level of detail for bio books went EK<BR<TPR (TPR being very detailed and BR being detailed, but more so towards information that would help with the assigned BR passages).
-I should have taken more of the AAMC practice tests.
7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
-First test, studied mainly during my spring semester and got burnt out going into June and July (about 6 months 2-4 hours a day), felt like I forgot a lot by test time (don't do this if you can avoid it, you will forget a lot of the beginning information)
-Second test, ~2 months making 2 passes through all the material with AAMC 7 and 8.

-Just do Sn2ed's schedule, put in the time for 3 months full time = probably do better than my 31. Enough said :beat:
 
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS = 9, VR = 9, BS = 9, Composite = 27 (August 2012)
PS = 10, VR = 7, BS = 12, Composite = 29 (August 2013)
PS = 10 VR = 11 BS = 12 Composite = 33 (September 2014)

Took a while but finally got a decent score. No idea what happened to verbal last year, should have never written it as I had a fever the morning of the test. Oh well.

2) The study method used for each section
Content review for about a month and a half, then two full months of practice problems.

3) What materials you used for each section
TPR for bio (and undergrad), TBR for physics, orgo and gen chem. EK101 for verbal (first 2 writes), TPR online verbal for the 3rd write. Also TPRH Verbal Workbook.

4) Which practice tests did you use? AAMC 3-11
All AAMC, 5 TPR tests and the free Gold Standard. This year, mainly prepped with the TPR tests as I had already done the others.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology, minor in psychology.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
Don't be afraid to rewrite. I had to twice. But also, don't be afraid to put the test off (as I should have when I was sick) - it may just not be your day when sick or just not completely prepared. DO USE the highlighter in verbal, it really helped me finally make my verbal score decent. Give it a try - it'll force you to concentrate on what you are reading. This test is more about how you can apply rather basic science concepts to novel scenarios under timed conditions. I would say like a poster above, that the real test is harder but the curve is more generous. Give no thought to your post-test feelings as I thought I did well my second write and we can all see how that panned out. All the best!
7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

1st write: just went to write it. Minimal studying. Very stupid of me.
2nd write: 3 months - 1 break day a week, realistically 3 solid hours a day, though I sat at my desk for about double that time.
3rd write: 3.5 months - more breaks per week and distracted because of the world cup. Devote at least an entire month to solely practice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score
9/06/2012 MCAT: 8 VR 7 PS 9 BS R WS (24R)
8/15/2013 MCAT: 9 VR 9 PS 10 BS (28)
9/10/2014 MCAT: 10 VR 12 PS 11BS (33)

2) The study method used for each section:
Let me preface this by telling you guys a little about myself. I have a low cGPA. My first year GPA (I am Canadian) is a 2.1, final year is a 3.85. cGPA is 3.21. I did graduate work after my undergrad and realized that I wanted to pursue medicine. My first MCAT was written when I was in the heat of my MSc, I was working more than 60h/week. Second time I wrote it I was working part time. Third time I did nothing but study for the MCAT.

First time I took the MCAT I took the Princeton Review course but I missed many classes and was unable to even remotely keep up with the work load. Second time I used the same study materials. Third time I ditched all the TPR materials and used TBR books. Personally, I loved the TBR books and found them to be extremely helpful.

On my 3rd attempt I used SN2'ed schedule with some modifications. I was unable to keep up with his/her written schedule, but did my best to keep up. Most emphasis went to PS. For VR, I used the EK101 book as well as TPR workbook. I did every single passage in both books. I kept timing down to ~7min per passage for all sections. On the real thing I had ~15 min to spare on PS, 5 min to spare on VR and ~20 min for BS. I didn't study BS, just used notes from class from two years prior to memorize what I needed to, although it did not help. My research background (I have an MSc in Physiology) probably helped me out huge here as most of the PSGS were literally figures taken from journals I had become used to reading. Organic chemistry I used TBR.

3) See above.

4) First time I did only aamc 11. Second time I went through all of them. 3rd time I didn't do a single practice exam.

5) What was your undergraduate major? Cell and Developmental Biology, with an MSc in Cardiac Electrophysiology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over? All three exams seemed to have followed the same mental game. They try and scare you at the beginning. Keep your cool. KEEP YOUR COOL. Nothing is more important. Besides this, I would say that if you don't get your score the first time, try again. Invest more time into it. Do not try to get a good score with a full time job. If you are a graduate student, respect your program, your supervisor, and your research and devote all your effort into being the best graduate student you can be AND THEN get on track for medical school admissions. Don't rush it.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT? First time, not really sure. Second time, about 8 weeks. Third time, about 12 weeks.

 
1) Your individual scores and composite score:
08/27/2014: 10 VR/11 BS/11 PS for a 32.

2) The study method used for each section:

Bio:
For biology I summarized the TPR Bio book in my own words for each chapter through the whole book, rewriting what I thought was pertinent and what wasn't, I then memorized them front to back.
Ochem:
I studied TBR's Ochem, but honestly after seeing the questions on the MCAT this was rather useless. I'm not really sure how anyone would study for Ochem on the MCAT, because it felt like a combination of exceedingly elementary concepts and exceedingly specific interactions.
Physics:
TBR Physics, I had never taken anything beyond grade 11 physics, so much of this was brand new material. For the most part I found TBR was incredibly effective at teaching, but their passages were more difficult than required and sometimes didn't match their content review. I've heard NOVA physics books are better.
Chemistry:
TBR Chem, I think of all the sections, TBR chemistry was by far the most effective in being similar to the MCAT itself and comprehensive. I wouldn't have changed anything I did for this section.

Overall I followed the SN2 schedule, but used TPR for bio review instead of EK, and didn't use any of the EK books. I also performed really well on my AAMC's in verbal and so didn't spend much time studying it, unfortunately I panicked on the section on the real thing and underperformed. Oh well.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
I used AAMC 5, 7, 9-11.

I took 11-9 in reverse order, which I suggest because 11 was quite difficult and I dramatically underperformed on it - you don't want to question your ability heading into the MCAT.
5) What was your undergraduate major?
Psychology (Hon.)

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Study. Don't give up. Write as many AAMC's as possible. If a material book isn't working for you or causing doubts then try different material.

Most importantly? Give your schedule two extra weeks. I burned out towards the end and that meant skipping some review days and cramming them all towards the end. Burn out is a real possibility, and having the ability to take a few days off in a row will help tremendously - if not then two extra weeks of studying will help too. And don't skip your rest days!

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

3 Months, but like I stated earlier - I needed two extra weeks. I spent 6 days a week studying at the very least 3.5 hours but it sometimes took as long as 8. I would say on average I was studying 5.5 hours a day 6 days a week.
 
Note the first part kind of breaks from the established format here since I was kind of an atypical case with my content deficiency so sorry if it reads more like a book than a concise list. I've bolded parts and included a list at the end which sums more of the tips I found that worked for me.

1) Your individual scores and composite score
8/15/14:
Voided it
9/12/14: 10 PS/ 11 VR/ 11 BS --> 32


2) The study method used + Test Experiences:

Going into this test, I literally had no idea about Gen Chem, Organic Chem and most of Physics since I had taken most of them almost 3-4 years ago and hadn't looked at them since I completed the classes. So going into studying I didn't want to waste a practice test by doing a diagnostic because I'm pretty sure I would have scored under 20 on my first try.

Originally started studying in earnest the last week of May after my finals for the semester, with a tentative schedule to take the test the first week of July, which game me like a month to get down everything. So for the first few weeks I studied around 8ish to 10 hours a day, sometimes even more. I didn't see the need to do those long thought out practice schedules like SN2 since I was running on a small amount of time and had to learn so much again, and I couldn't afford to buy an MCAT class (plus I also heard that they're a waste of money and time). My GPA wasn't the highest so I was pretty damn motivated to do alright on this test and didn't need the structure of a class to drive me to study. Also I was very lucky to be able to devote my entire summer to this test and drop that many hours into studying, feel it was worth it in the end.

First I looked at the "Official MCAT Guide" by the AAMC that I had recently got. I skimmed some of the verbal and Bio questions and felt somewhat comfortable with them (besides Ochem) but nowhere where I wanted to be. Looking at the Gen Chem and Physics passages I had literally no idea what the hell they were talking about so I decided to start there first. For PS I used Examkrackers originally, read the Physics and Gen Chem Books while making my own notes, took around a week to do both books and make my notes as well as answer the end of chapter tests. After every day I'd look over my notes of what I wrote in the day and went over them. The first week or so was absolutely brutal as Examkrackers really doesn't cement the foundation of knowledge as well as you should in Physics, so a lot of stuff just went over my head conceptually. After that I ended up going to the Biological section in Examkrackers which went a lot better since I'm a bio major and a lot of the stuff was easy to recall for me. However after doing Bio and going to Ochem, which I struggled with immensely trying to get the fundamentals down again, I had slacked off in looking at the PS notes I had done before. So essentially I had forgot the information that I had crammed a few days ago. Ended up rereading the chemistry and physics books again while looking at the notes, which took basically another week. At that point I felt like I had a better idea, but I was already 3 weeks out from my test at the time and I felt that I wouldn't be prepared, so I delayed it a month or so to August.

From there I stopped doing those crazy 8-10 hour days of just studying and trying to memorize formulas and moved it to around 6 hours a day of hardcore studying/answer practice questions from the Princeton Review Science Workbook. Still though, I had felt that my PS was shaky, so I started to do the Princeton Review books. I'll say this, for a person who didn't know any Physics at all Princeton Review is definitely the way to go. The book is WAAAY longer but there is more explanations, better diagrams, more practice questions, etc, so it was exactly what I needed. Took notes on the Physics and Chemistry books as well and looked at them every night. At that time while working through the Physics workbook the practice questions in the chapters felt really difficult: I had felt I had understood the material but sometimes the end of chapter passages I'd miss half the questions just because I'd be lost as to how to approach the question. I read the answer explanations and tried to understand the reasoning but sometimes it still didn't stick. Still, I trudged on and continued through that monster of a book and completed it. The Gen Chem, after the Examkrackers version, went by much quicker since the content in the Examkrackers Chemistry was done really well and explained almost everything succinctly so the PR book was more like a review than anything. But another problem happened again as I was planning to take my first practice test: My ochem was still shaky. Ended up rereading my notes and the Examcrackers book (it's pretty short in general) again as well as read the entire "Ochem as a second language" book I had and took notes on that.

Verbal I never really studied for at that time, felt like I should take a practice test for it first then see where I stood. I was always decent in english/writing classes and did well in the few Philosophy courses I took which was similar in understanding an argument and making conclusions based off examples.

So I took AAMC 3, and got a 31 (11 PS, 10 VR, 10 BS). Felt pretty decent about that as I was around a month out from my test at that time. After every AAMC test I'd look over the entire test, whether I got the question right or wrong, and wrote trends, stuff I missed, stuff I guessed on, and also things that I wasn't explicitly sure about but the question stated it was true (i.e. in the "not" questions, the incorrect answers are inherently true in their reasoning, so I'd write the answer choices that I hadn't known or wasn't sure of). I felt this helped to cement my understanding even more as it was basically an answer to a question that the MCAT could ask, I usually did AAMC postgaming the same day.

After that first test, I decided that I'd start to finish the Princeton Review Hyperleaning Science Workbook. So over the course of the next week I finished almost all of it. I didn't score so well on some of the passages, but every time I missed something or wasn't sure of something I'd write it in a little notebook. Every night I'd relook over that notebook and my AAMC 3 practice test mistake sheets, while every other day looking over my notes for each subject. At that time it took like 2 hours to do a decent skim review of all the notes I had written down. At this time though I still had trouble memorizing every single equation, as the Science workbook in the Physics Section was killing me at times because I just forgot the equation, so I ended up buying a dry erase board (to conserve paper and lower mess in my room) with a marker and just wrote down every single equation that I could remember, and what it stood for, what it was used in, etc. I did this like 1 or 2 times a day for the month leading up to my test and it definitely helped me quickly cram in all those equations, sin angles, and other equations.

Later on I incorporated that dry erase board method for the entire BS and PS section: I'd write out all the hormones, where they come from, what they target, what they do. All the body systems, gibbs free energy equations, solubility rules, the mechanisms for carboxylic acids, etc. This took a lot longer than normal skimming through my notes but helped immensely as when I got closer to the test I could crank out stuff like the thin lens equation like nothing which is of immeasurable help in a timed test where every second counts: You don't want to to waste 30 seconds to remember the equation for an Electric Force, or for a power dissipated equation.

Ended up using the AAMC R variants for the next few tests. The tests were much longer (over 5 hours) but I felt that the more I exposed myself to questions the more comfortable I'd get with the test. The scores on these were kind of weird since the answer keys I found sometimes didn't correspond to a question or two so I'd have to search and guesstimate the actual correct answer. For 4,5, and 6, I think I got a 31, 33, and 32 respectively but not sure since I never wrote them down. At that time my PS was usually the strongest by hitting 11's or 12's consistently, a consistent 10-11 on Verbal, and pretty much a stagnant 10 on Bio. My goal score was a 33 so I felt I was in the range of where I wanted to be and what I was doing was working so I kept up with it and made my error sheets.

So almost every night (sometimes I'd take a break on a practice test day), I'd look over the journal I had with the PR Workbook errors, all the AAMC errors, do the whiteboard review, and every few days ago would skim my notes again. I started to get a little burned out but I was too worried about scoring low that I kept this schedule mostly in tact. I did take breaks every so often by listening to some music, reading news, playing video games, etc, but most of my waking day was spent in front of a computer or a book working practice problems.

Less than 2 or so weeks out I began to do the AAMC CBT's on e-mcat. I started with tests 10 and 11 but due to a sound issue during these tests as well (family was just talking a bit too loud at one point, had to tell them multiple times that I could hear them, thankfully they obliged, but I probably should have done it earlier) as well as general burnout I scored all time lows in one section for each: an 8 in Verbal for AAMC 10 and an 8 in AAMC 11 PS. Luckily I had scored well on the other sections for the respective tests I still was close to where I wanted to be just not quite there. Still I was scared as hell because I had never scored that low in Verbal and the PS in AAMC 11 was more difficult in general, and didn't want to score a sub 30 score if I got rocked in both a PS and VR on the actual test day. So I took a few days off from actually taking a test (I was around a week and a half out from the real test), and just relooked over all the error sheets and notes I had made while doing practice problems from Examkrackers books and the like.

I had also started the Examkrackers Verbal 101 passages at around this time to see if it would help but I do not recommend it. I had scored decent on the first few tests but felt that the questions were just too easy in general as well as just asked questions that the AAMC wouldn't ask. Even though I was scoring well on the Verbal Examkrackers passages, I had gotten that low 8 in AAMC 10 and a 9 in AAMC 7 (which I took after 10 and 11). Seeing this drop in scores concerned me so I dropped the book which definitely helped me.

The Week of the test I took AAMC 8, and scored a 33 (with my verbal score back to normal ranges). After that, going into the test I had regained some confidence I decided to take it easy going into the test with just general review over concepts, with the day before barely looking at any stuff at all. August 15th, 8 AM rolls around, and I sit to take the PS section of my first MCAT. I usually hadn't written down equations during the trial section when I had practiced because I had felt under control and calm but if you have the opportunity, write EVERYTHING you can in those 10-20 minutes you have with the agreement and introduction pages. Don't care if it's PS, BS, or verbal tips, write down everything you possibly can remember with those 10-20 minutes as you might end up with an insane PS section that was almost nothing like your practice tests which is what happened with me. Literally felt like I had made known 40% of the stuff, made educated guesses on 25% of the other questions, and straight up guessed on the other 35%. Never had I marked for review so many questions (over 20) when I did my first run through, and this shook me. Trying to recall info for other questions was difficult because I had already felt beaten by just this one section. I finished the PS section but felt like invariable **** throughout my 10 minute break.

For the first 5 minutes of VR I was in a haze but ended up going through it, luckily it was the same old VR, but in the back of my head I just had this feeling that I was going to void. I told myself that if I felt really well about the next wto sections I'd score.

BS came up and like VR it was similar to the practice tests. There were still some questions I hadn't known and had to make educated guesses on but there was always stuff like that and I had scored decently where I needed to be. On the score or void page I stared at it and cycled through the choices for almost the entire 5 minutes. In the end I just didn't feel comfortable with my performance, so in the last 10 seconds I chose to void it. I felt annoyed that the AAMC would have such a crazy PS section to start things off but got over it as I ended starting to study a week later for a retake I had scheduled a month later.

I had started to read the Berkeley Review books for PS which I recommend as well, they are way harder but have some good conceptual tips that PR didn't seem to hit on. Over this time I looked over the Princeton Review Organic Chem since there were a few O chem questions that Examkrackers didn't seem to go into that were on my test, as well as the bio and chem books, writing notes only for the bio and chem books. Those generally were done quickly though since I felt I knew most of the stuff already.

Since I had exhausted almost all the AAMC tests and only had AAMC 9 left before my retake I just focused on redoing some practice problems from the self assessment (which sadly had reused some problems from the R versions so I had prior exposure to some of the questions beforehand) as well as doing Berkeley Review Questions for the next couple weeks or so.

The week of my retake I took AAMC 9 and scored a 33 again, so I (again) had some confidence going into the test. The day before though I didn't take a day off and instead did some decent studying into my weak errors which absolutely helped as few things I had looked over were actually on my test the next day. 8 AM rolls by on that Friday and I'm back taking this godforsaken test. Instead of going right into the test I wrote down everything I could on those scratch pieces of paper, exhausting almost all of the 20 minutes they give you beforehand. This helped so much as I referred to that stuff multiple times during the PS section to confirm I was using the right equation or to remind me of which one to use, it saved me time in the end. Also going into the PS I had noticed how much more similar (and thus easier imo) the PS was compared to my MCAT a month prior and while I still had to guess on a few I felt so much better this time around with my performance on it. I didn't feel like I got a 15, but felt more like I did normally after a PS section.

VR rolls by and that confidence from doing alright helps me get through it. The passages felt longer, but the questions the same. Nothing out of the ordinary.

BS comes by and it's similar to AAMC 11 and the test I had taken a month prior. Ended up feeling pretty well about it, even though they had some ridiculous discretes that were never on the practice tests and my prep books explicitly told me not to study, so I had to make educated guesses on those and hope they were just experimentals that were not graded.

Void Screen comes up and this time I make sure I score it,. Take the trial section (I had psych/sociology) and felt it was pretty simple and that if you'd study for it you could easily ace it. I felt my score going out was around a 30 but not sure if I had hit what I wanted.

While I didn't get my goal score of 33 a 32 is close enough and around what my average was anyway. I kinda wished I had gotten at least an 11 in PS because that was usually my stronger section with VR but what can you do. It's not a 38+ but I feel it's a solid enough score... My haphazardly devised study plan seemed to actually work in the end.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

Bio
: Examkrackers, Princeton Review. If you're short on time do Examkrackers, it's good enough for most of the stuff I feel.

Physics: Princeton Review, Berkeley Review, Examkrackers. I wouldn't recommend Examkrackers unless you already have a good foundation in Physics. Princeton Review is better for a newbie I feel, and Berkeley Review is better for those conceptual problems (which were in much less effect during my retake).

O chem: Examkrackers, Princeton Review, and some Berkeley Review. I would recommend using both Examkrackers and PR but not Berkeley review. O chem was such a small factor on both of my tests that I took and Berkeley was going too far in depth minutiae that it felt like a waste of time. If you really want that 15 on BS it might help you to look at it but for the majority of people, especially for those who are under time restraints, should look to EK and PR.

Chem: Examkrackers and Princeton Review. Both of these are equal in my mind. PR has more practice questions in the chapters as you go along and more diagrams but the content is virtually identical.

Verbal: Do not use EK101, it focuses on too many of the "gimme" questions that the MCAT asks like "what does the author think about x" and in the passage it literally says the "author thinks y about x" which ends up being the correct answer. Use it for timing the section or something, but don't treat it like the real thing. I looked over the Princeton Review Verbal Book (not the one with the passages the content book) and though it was trash as well. There is no way I would have that much time to spend time mapping stuff out and marking if it's an inference question.

Other: PR Science Workbook: Highly recommend. Its Bio section is a perfect example of the type of stuff you'll be expected to ask. It's physics and Ochem sections are pretty good too. Plenty of passages and discretes to tackle.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
Only AAMCs (using the R variants for 4-6 I believe). Used all of them. As well as all the Self Assessment modules.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Neurobiology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

1. Do not waste AAMC practice tests if you feel you are severely lacking knowledge. Maybe take a Kaplan or PR practice test before hand and work your shortcomings from there. Since I was deficient in pretty much every content based topic I spent a lot of time doing just content review which was worth it.

2.Make sure to understand Genetics, as both of my recent tests had a decent amount of explicit genetics questions for the Bio section.

3. Don't linger on questions that you probably don't know. These might and probably will happen to you, just guess, mark it if you want and move on. If you have time you can revisit it later, but there is no point looking at it for 2 minutes only to still guess on it. Time is of the essence.

4. If you really really feel that you did terrible on a section and there is a realistic chance that it seriously hurt your performance and overall score on the test, don't be afraid to void it. (note for people taking the last of the 2014 tests this might not work for you). It sucks, you have to study again, drop more money, etc, but looking at the August 15th thread, where people also felt the PS was brutal, many scored below their averages, especially in PS. So I felt that I had dodged a bullet when I voided it. Getting a sub 30 score, which I felt was highly likely if I had scored that test, would be a huge shot against my app for allopathic schools and would only add more stress to do well on my retake. Remember for every guy that gets a 34 but felt terrible after taking the test, there are probably just as much, if not more that felt bad, didn't void, and scored well under their averages. If possible, don't let your chances at being a doctor be largely up to a curve. It's too risky, at least in my case.

5. Your AAMC 10-11 scores are not the end all be all. My actual score was much closer to my earlier numbered tests on average.

6. If you have the time and willpower you don't need to drop thousands of dollars on an expensive prep course. I'm so glad I didn't drop that ludicrous amount of money for one.

7. Studying the night before absolutely helped me for my retake. It kept my mind sharp, and helped me remember small details that I had tended to forget, which ended up appearing on the actual test the next day.

8. Don't change things up for the test day if you normally don't do it. I usually don't eat breakfast, so before the tests I made sure not to eat anything beforehand. During my break I'd snack on a granola bar or something but it was nothing substantial.

9. On that note, make sure you go to the bathroom beforehand, don't want to risk having to waste time going to the bathroom because you drank too much coffee shortly before.

10. Stay calm during the test, it's hard at times, but it really does help. If possible see if you can bring earbuds as they block sounds better than the earmuffs. I had wish I brought earbuds for my retake because of some guy in the testing room making noise throughout the test that I would hear. But whatever it's done now.

11. My verbal strategy probably won't work for many but here's what I basically did in every test and averaged around a 11 consistently with a high of 12 a couple of times: Read the passage first, and reread the introduction or thesis statement a couple of times if you're still not sure what the passage is talking about. Read through the passage decently quickly (around 2- 2:30 minutes on average), making note of notable things like author's main points, opinions, examples, counterexamples (Use your highlighter here it does help for this) until the end then answer the questions. I referred back to the passage a lot, this way, sometimes for every single question. I found that sometimes if I had no idea what the actual main point the passage was talking about, I'd figure it out while looking through the passage again to answer the more specific questions. Again this might not work for everyone but I found it provided me a consistent way to score decently on verbal. You have to be able to read quickly for this but I feel your verbal reading speed should pick up the more you do practice tests. Also if you find yourself daydreaming or losing focus during a part, sound the words out under your breath, it will make you read a little slowly, but I feel my comprehension improves a bit when I do this.

12. Caffeine was my friend. Never drank so many energy drinks or caffeinated beverages in my life during those few months but they did keep me up and able to roll through those books and practice problems

13. This test is beatable. I was under some of the greatest stress ever, essentially relearning an equivalent of almost 2 years of undergrad prereqs in less than 4 months, but if I was able to do it and net a decent score from a scant amount of content going in, I feel anyone who really payed attention in their classes and recently took them/did well in them will be able to do fine as long as they put in the effort.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
3.5 months, around 10 hours a day for the first few weeks, then down to 6ish hours a day for the rest on average.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=14 VR=13 BS=14 Composite=41

2) The study method used for each section
PS and BS: reviewed all of the materials - took notes on chapter in Berkeley review books, then made note cards from things I found difficult (ended up with ~500 note cards total), then took 1/3rd of the test at the end of the chapter. Repeated until done with books. A note about note cards: I've been browsing this thread and I haven't seen a lot of other people mention the idea of using notecards which I find a bit perplexing. There were tons of stuff that I learned studying and that were relevant for the test that I never would have remembered without notecards. They helped me study more productively; my goal was basically to make sure I never made the same mistake twice. VR: took the EK 101 Verbal tests, didn't start this until ~3wks before exam so it was pretty condensed.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
Berkeley Review, EK 101 VR

4) Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC 9, 10, 11. Scored 37, 37, 38. All these scores were a bit disappointing. If I remember right I was 1 question away from being 1 point higher on 8/9 sections, and I felt like I was making dumb mistakes on top of that. I was thinking after these that I probably "deserved" a 39 or so, mostly based on bad luck as to how my wrong answers were distributed. Got more sleep in the days leading up to the test which I think helped; also never hurts to get a little lucky.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
Relax! Just learning to calm down and treat the test like any other test made things go way easier. Especially on the Verbal section. It's a long test; thinking too much will just make it easier to confuse yourself and the test will be exhausting. Along the same lines, always eliminate answers by crossing out unless you immediately know the right answer. Just makes it easier not to trip yourself up. Also my thoughts on going back/checking your answers - I used to have the idea that you should stick with your gut/first answer but then I played around with correcting stuff on the BR practice tests and I found out that this idea was totally wrong! Marking tough questions (I marked ~10 per section on my practice and actual tests) and changing answers I thought I got wrong were extremely helpful. I changed about 5-6 answers total after going back on my actual test and I'm pretty sure I got all of them right. And take study breaks! I can't believe all the people who say they spent 4 or 6 or 8 hours a day studying - after a few hours there are some serious diminishing returns. And do fun stuff too! We're not in med school yet; there's still plenty of time to have a social life/volunteer/do research/work out or whatever else you enjoy.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
3 months, ~1-2 hrs a day for the first 2 months, more like ~3 hrs a day for the last month. Was doing review/writing notecards for the vast majority of this, I think I finished up with that about 2-3 weeks before my test. For the last 3 weeks I reviewed notecards, did verbal review, and took practice tests. I was nervous that that wouldn't be enough time for review but it turned out to be more than enough, the last week or so I felt like I'd kinda run out of things to study.

Edited to be more informative
 
Last edited:
1. Individual scores and composite score
PS14 VR11 BS13, Composite 38
2. Study method for each section.
Read the EK review books, one chapter a day, do the in-reading problems and the 30 minute exams at the back. Do two verbal passages everyday. More comprehensive description under 6.
3. What materials you used for each section?
EK Review books, EK 101 Verbal and a little TPR Verbal
4. Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC 3 (as diagnostic before any reviewing or knowledge about the exam scored 31), AAMC 4-11 as practice after reviewing content (got 39's and 40's)
5. What was your undergraduate major?
Biological Basis of Behavior (basically Neuroscience) and Chemistry
6. Any other tips?
This was basically my study plan with a few tips thrown in there:
So I mainly used ExamKracker's as I found this to be the most concise (I had a tutor that recommended this and I looked at some of the others and he seemed correct with this assumption). The other review books I find go into a lot more detail than necessary. Now if you feel really weak in one area you may want to get another review book that goes more in depth so you have a better general knowledge about it, but I found EK to give you the essentials. So for the first month and a half my day would look like this:

-read a chapter in one of the subjects of EK and do the problems in the reading and the chapter exams at the end of the book

-review the chapter I read the day before by skimming the pages and taking a second look at anything confusing as well as quickly going through the questions paying more attention to the ones I had missed

-do 2 verbal passages from EK 101 Passages or TPR Verbal with a 15 minute timer (this is shorter than you get on the exam but I found it helped me think and read faster)

-review the verbal passages I had done the day before

This would take anywhere from 3-5 hours. Then after the 5th day I would have a review day where I would review the four previous chapters I had read (skim through the pages and look at the questions again) and do two more verbal passages. I also took a break day once a week.

One thing I advise during this time is to do a different subjects (Orgo, Bio, Chem, Physics) everyday so all the subjects are always fresh in your mind. I would normally do one chapter from each book and then my review day I would review these four chapters.

A few notes for Verbal. First, practice AND review. Make sure to review the questions not just after you do the passages but the next day to remind yourself why you got a question wrong. It might seem stupid at first and like it isn't helping but I noticed when I forgot to do that I was not improving but when I started reviewing the day after I noticed I was doing better. Second, I never felt like I was improving at Verbal but my scores were, so don't get discouraged if you don't feel like you are getting better or learning how to master Verbal. I feel a lot of the Verbal strategies you learn while practicing are almost subconscious. You just start getting a feel of what looks like the right answer even if you aren't 100% sure, and it is often right. I could not tell you "I know this is the right answer because X" but after doing so many problems you just start getting a sense of what the right answer is even if you can't really explain why (I know this is kind of a frustrating response but its what I found). Obviously if you aren't getting more correct answers in your practice then you should reevaluate what you are doing and maybe try something different, but don't expect a huge "aha" moment when it comes to Verbal. Third, one tip my tutor told me and it seemed pretty true is to go with your gut on Verbal. It is one reason why I practiced with 7.5 minutes a passage even though you get around 8.5 minutes on the real thing. The more you think about a question the more you start validating wrong answers and tripping yourself up (which is what the exam writers want). If you find yourself struggling and toiling with questions try just going with your gut reaction to the question. See how it works. It may not work for you but it definitely helped me. Lastly, get two verbal practice books (I suggest EK 101 because it has good questions and TPR verbal because it has good passages) and keep changing between the two once you feel like you have plateaued with one. They help you practice slightly different strategies so it is good to do both.


So after this month and a half I took the 5 Self-Assessments. I took the Chem and Physics on the same day and the Bio and Orgo on the same day and then all the Verbal on one day. I did not know how long they were going into it so I might recommend doing just one a day as it was a lot. Definitely split up the Verbal. 21 passages is just too many for one person to do in one day without getting extremely fatigued and frustrated. I did it all in one day and got 88% correct on the first 14 passages and 64% on the last 7 passages, so fatigue definitely played a factor and I wasted good practice passages trying to do them while exhausted. After each Self-Assessment I spent 2 days reviewing all of the questions on that Self-Assessment, paying more attention to the ones I missed or guessed on. Through this time I was also still doing 2 verbal passages a day and reviewing them the next day (THIS IS KEY FOR VERBAL).

After this the way my schedule worked out I had an extra week or so in my study schedule I spent just taking one subject a day and skimming through the whole book and the questions making sure to brush up on anything that I still felt was weak. I felt weakest on the Bio body systems so I got the TPR and Kaplan Bio books and read the body system chapters to get a little different view on them. I also continued the two daily verbal passages.

This led me up to about a month before the exam, when I started taking the AAMC practice exams. I took two practice exams every week with two days in between and a rest day each week. During those two days in between I went through the practice exams each day looking at every question and paying close attention to the ones I missed or marked. I then took one chapter from each subject book (Orgo, Chem, Bio, Physics) and spent just about 20 minutes each skimming the chapter and looking at the in-reading questions to make sure I still felt comfortable with the material. For Bio, which I felt was my weakest science, I would actually just reread a chapter every day in between practice exam days since the EK chapters are not too long and Bio is something you learn more by just reading material on it rather than doing questions. While this short review of each chapter may seem insignificant I found it important for me to at least look at the material so it would stay fresh in my mind since the practice exams don't cover all the material you have to know. Taking a month to just do practice exams is a long time that you may forget some details that the practice exams don't cover, which is why I did this quick daily chapter review. I also bought a book called Kaplan 45 Advanced Prep that had some really tough practice that I would try on these between exam days but I really wouldn't recommend it unless you feel like the normal practice isn't tough enough. I didn't find it that helpful and it was a little discouraging. Lastly, of course, I would do my two verbal passages. These days would take about 4-6 hours.

So this led me up to the last two days before the exam where I just relaxed and tried not to think about the exam. I had made a study guide with formulas and facts/terms I often forget earlier that I just glimpsed over once or twice these two days before, but other than that I just tried to relax my brain. The MCAT is like running a marathon, there is no point in practicing a ton the two days before. You have prepared for awhile for this and it would only hurt you.

So that is what I did to prepare for the exam. Hope this helps. Personally I would say to stay away from the review classes such as Kaplan and Princeton and stuff as I feel each person learns a little bit differently and might have their own things that work better for them. I got a personal tutor (from Next Step Test Prep) and it was helpful but really if you can plan your schedule and stick to it studying on your own is really the best way to learn it. A tutor can help you come up with a schedule and answer some of your questions but overall it comes down to just sitting down and doing the stuff.

7. How long did you study?
About 3 months. 3-5hrs/day 6 days a week for content review and 4-6hrs/day 6 days a week during practice exams. I was also taking Orgo lab and working 20-25hrs/week at my research job
 
Very Non-traditional applicant holding a full time job.
1) Your individual scores and composite score: VR:10, PS:13, BS: 11 Total: 34 (took it only once on 10/25/14)
2) Study method for each section:
1.5 months before I took the real MCAT, someone told me that things were changing after Jan. So I panicked and I registered for the exam, and then started taking FLs right from the get go even with major content holes. Did a thorough post analysis of each FL to figure out what was missing and the fastest way to fix it (especially for BS and PS).
For VR, I knew I wasn't going to improve much over a month...so made it a goal to score a 10, which I did. All I did was practice timed passages everyday, making sure to do a thorough post analysis to find flaws in strategy. Initially I was spending too much time reading passages until it dawned on me that I get points for answering the questions correctly!
3) What materials you used for each section?:
PS: Used Kaplan's books.
BS: Used Kaplan's books
VR: AAMC self assessment package
4) Which practice tests did you use?
AAMC 8 through 11 and Kaplan 1 through 7
5) What is your undergraduate major?
I am a dinosaur compared to many of you... graduated from undergrad in early 2000s. BS through PhD all in Engineering (applied math more or less). I stayed a mile away from all bio and orgo classes and never took either of them in college. I guess life changes you.... Took medschool required prerequisite university biology and organic chemistry the same year I took the MCAT.
6) Tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
If I can do it, so can you! Work smart and not just hard, when prepping. The exam isn't difficult at all. But if you are a NonTrad like me, you have a billion other things to juggle. Just be confident and trust in yourself and all the work you have put in.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
Studied for exactly a month through the kaplan online sessions, and as and when I could squeeze between a full time job, volunteering, evening classes, voluntary research, writing publications and shadowing. Made it a point to study at least one hour/day during the week and 5 hours during weekends (Taking FL exams).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
It's about time that I posted as much of my personal strategy that I can in this thread. To be honest I'm kind of ashamed that I haven't yet! Without further ado, here is Vihsadas's Personal MCAT Strategy (err...mostly, I think.):


Is there any books you'd recommend? I'm thinking about starting, to study, now, but without having taken all the courses I'd need some good study materials.
 
1) Your individual scores and composite score

37Q: PS 11, VR 13, BS 13

2) The study method used for each section

PS - Kaplan, TPR
BS - Kaplan, TPR
VR - Kaplan, TPR


3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc) Kaplan, TPR

4) Which practice tests did you use? TPR, Kaplan

5) What was your undergraduate major? Biology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us? Lots of PTs. I would suggest at least once a week. It is better time management to take the PTs frequently rather than studying the material.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT? 4-5 Months
 
1) Your individual scores and composite score
Oct 21 2014
PS/VR/BS: 11/13/12 - 36

2) The study method used for each section
  • BS - One of my majors was in bio so I mostly focused on ochem:
    • Looked through the topics list and made flash cards by compound type, functional group, and common steps in synthesis. EX: How do I get a C=O? A C=C? An alcohol? On the back were the names of the rxns and their mechanisms.
    • Focused on mostly trends: nucleophilicity, acidity, basicity, reactivity of types of compounds (ex order of reactivity for carboxylic acid derivatives).
    • I made sure I had a strong foundation on pushing electrons, resonance stability, H-bonding. They come up a lot in explaining how reactions happen, and in remembering reactivity/acidity/basicity trends.
    • Quiz and recall! Drawing connections and mentally grouping reactions into these categories (see above) + challenging myself to retrieve the info. by flashcards --> easy memorization! On the subway, right before bed, breaks at work... bring those flashcards out!
  • PS - I had a mediocre undergrad foundation in physics (basically BSed my way through the class) and I took chem freshman yr so that wasn't fresh, so this was the main focus of MCAT study
    • Started out scoring 7s and 8s. Good thing this is the easiest section to pull up.
    • There's a crapload of equations to remember for bio and chem. Memorization hurts for me so I made flashcards of basic concepts in PS + their equations and connected them to real world examples.
    • Note the relationships between subtopics: ex the clear parallel b/w bernoulli's and conservation of energy, or Fgrav and electric force.
    • Tons of practice passages from the berkeley review books (they go hard on testing concepts IMO) and that huge princeton review science workbook (the older version is called hyperlearning). For every question I got wrong, I identified the hole in my knowledge and made sure I understood the concept forwards and back. this is time consuming and I didn't get to focus on all topics like this. I know I would have scored higher than my 11 on PS if I actually made it through the workbook and BR science books. Make a realistic schedule where you can comb through every PS topic... and stick to it.
    • FORGET THE DISTINCTION B/W HIGH YIELD AND LOW YIELD TOPICS. Test day was my nightmare combination of the topics I prepared for the least. Go through those AAMC topics lists and make sure you know everything. This will prevent freakouts on test day.
  • VR - Honestly my practice test scores stayed pretty constant. I started scoring 13s and 14s, and I didn't really prepare for this section. :S
    • IMO the strategies and formulas from most test prep companies are unhelpful crap and waste time. Everyone thinks and processes information differently...
    • I like to try and identify the main idea as I read the passage. It's not about what you make of the passage, it's about what the author is trying to say. Every argument, anecdote, and example has a purpose. Why is the author including it, and what does it do for their point?
    • Before getting to the passage, quickly glance over the question stems for things like "in the x paragraph" or quoting specific phrases and words by the author. It saves time; you're actively anticipating these key phrases as you read, and it reduces the amount of hunting you'll need to do after finishing the passage.
3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

I'm just gonna list the ones I found valuable

TPR Science Workbook (before 2013 these were called hyperlearning) THIS IS AWESOME
TPR Physics and Math Review
The Berkeley Review Chemistry and Physics
Kaplan Organic Chemistry
TPR Biology Review

4) Which practice tests did you use?

in order:

AAMC FL 3 - 5 w/ avg score of ~28
~finished content review~
TPR 1 - 26 (TPRs tests are killer)
AAMC 7, 8, 10 w/ avg score of 30
~3 weeks before test~
TPR 3 - 31
AAMC 9 - 34

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology & Theology/Religious Studies

Physiology and Biochem were the most helpful classes for this test. Taking them my last semester before the MCAT saved me so much study time!

I think majoring in the humanities helped with my verbal score. Four years of reading, and learning to read right before class so I could understand enough to participate in class :p

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
  • First thing: Looked through the AAMC topics list, ID your strengths and weaknesses. Structure your study plan around that. IMO some test prep books actually miss topics and I didn't realize this until I went through the list.
  • Have a strong conceptual foundation before taking most of your practice tests. Yes obvi take a practice test before you finish content review so you have a baseline, but after that try to lay off the practice tests before you finish concept review otherwise you get low, discouraging scores :(
  • If you have a month left, shift your focus on practice tests. If you're scoring below 10 on sections, this generally reflects holes in content knowledge and it's recommended that you postpone. I... guess this advice isn't really relevant if you're taking the "old" mcat.
  • Stay calm. Adrenaline rush and panic can seriously affect your thinking ability.
    • If you find yourself freaking out during the test, or your eyes getting tired... take a moment to chill out. Meditate or something. Better to spend half a minute on this simple exercise to regain your concentration then spending 10 consecutive minutes frantically clicking through the test.
7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
3 months while working
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=12 VR=10 BS=14 Composite= 36

2) The study method used for each section
I have been a tutor for gen chem and orgo 1 for 3 semesters and have been a TA for gen bio for 4 semesters. Already knew 90% of the material prior to studying. Mostly focused on getting my timing down and learning a few unfamiliar topics.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
EK 2009 and Kaplan 2007 for all sections....But not kaplan for VR. Used 101 passages for VR.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
Took one practice kaplan....thought it was ridiculous after taking a practice aamc.....nothing like the actual exam. Would not recommend taking kaplans exams seriously...just maybe as a way for review material and get the timing down.
Took all aamc practices.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology B.S.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
I would suggest cramming. This way you don't forget the material that you learned in the beginning. Take all the aamc practice exams and really focus on what you missed and don't understand. Def get VR 101 passages by EK. Don't take Kaplan prep course or really any prep course.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
5 weeks. ~5 hours a day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
1) Your individual scores and composite score
1st attempt PS/VR/BS: 10/8/13 - 31
2nd attempt PS/VR/BS: 12/10/15 - 37

Will mention this: My first attempt (31), I studied for about 2 weeks before testing (DON'T DO THIS) during my Jr year of undergrad. My second attempt, I was working 8-4's and studying 4:30-10:30 for about 2 months (with breaks for food)--again, DON'T DO THIS. I wouldn't recommend working AND studying for this test even if your mental fortitude is phenomenal (like mine, kappa). The reason I mention this is not because I was "burned out" (I don't believe in that), but because I was actually becoming quite ill. Five days before my most recent attempt, I was feeling particularly crappy, went to the doc, and BOOM - Mononucleosis. So yes, my malaise was NEXT LEVEL when I took my most recent test, I was struggling to keep my eyes open; undoubtedly, I was both physically and mentally tired from my past 2 months' schedule.

overall: If you have to work while you study--very possible, but know your limits. However, I suggest dedicating your time to MCAT alone if possible--I would have scored better and wouldn't be have Eptstein Barr Virus cycling between lytic and lysogenic phases in me as I type this (lol wtf BS review content provided in my post?).


2) The study method used for each section

BS - Review content - skimmed through TPR books
To be quite frank, biology and organic has never been an issue of mine. I skimmed through TPR (I think it was a 2010 edition - white book) as review and was set. Albeit, after my AAMC FL's, I reviewed any question I got wrong thoroughly. I went through these questions with a fine-toothed comb; why did I get this wrong? what was my logic? what is AAMC's logic? Was my logic sound? Is AAMC's logic sound? <---- ASK THIS QUESTION. I work in a basic science lab and have read hundreds of papers, and believe me, AAMC can have flawed or unclear logic when it comes to interpreting scientific data. But does it really matter that their logic is flawed? NO, IT DOESN'T, THEY WRITE THE TEST. Understand their reasoning in and out--just like a scientist would a paper--and you will see improvement.



PS - TPR content review. Practice questions: anything I could get my hands on
Practice. Practice. Practice. After reviewing PS for about two weeks, I came up with a theory: there are instances and very certain questions that COULD appear on the MCAT that one would not answer correctly unless they have seen that question/logic before. Even if you know physics and gchem in and out (and I thought I did even before studying), there are questions that will leave you whispering a small "what the f**k" out of the corner of your mouth. I believe exposure is the best way to score well on PS. With that being said, I dedicated about 140 minutes a day to strictly doing PS questions - two 70 minute sessions (notice MCAT PS is 70 mins). What content did I use? TPR, EK 1001, AAMC's R tests, and this pretty sick app for iOS called "MCAT prep" - big shout out to whoever made this app (however, be aware that they CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS WRONG. I think noticing when a question is right/wrong only aids in a holistic understanding of MCAT material - so do be aware). On a side note, and I'm not saying I did this, but review content can be torrented quite easily. Make sure you have a basic understanding of VPNs and proxies if you plan to try this.

VR - Review ONLY AAMC FL's. Only become familiar with their logic, NOT TPR, EK, or whoever else. ONLY AAMC. Firstly, I don't excel at verbal--as you can see by my scores. I am a SCIENTIFICALLY analytical person with a touch of perfectionism, and this spells disaster for verbal due to its very nature: a holistic understanding of THE AUTHOR, not necessarily the author's words. However, as you see, I still managed to score a 10 by simply picking through each and every AAMC FL verbal passage and putting myself in the test-writer's mindset. This is all I did for verbal.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

TPR for content review, EK 1001, TPR science book, TBR, MCAT prep app, AAMC R tests

4) Which practice tests did you use?

All AAMC FL's
My averages: 13.16/9/13.5 (PS/VR/BS) - 35.67

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology, psych minor

However, I do believe anyone can excel at the MCAT regardless of major

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Mainly, for those out there who plan to study minimally (as I did my first attempt) and achieve an elite score, good luck. It's much easier to score well with proper preparation - and I needed a good score to make myself competitive for MD/PhD. On a final note, and something that may sound a bit conceded, but be kinda cocky, have swag, and know that you are smart enough to answer any question presented to you.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
~2 months - 8 weeks on and last week was rest b/c of mono

Good luck friends!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
First of all, as a long time lurker on this thread, it is exciting to be able to post. Secondly, while it was only a Kaplan Diagnostic, I started at a 21, so there is hope, just keep pushing.

1) Your individual scores and composite score
36 (PS 13, VR 11, BS 12)

2) The study method used for each section
I self studied for this test. In general, practice problems are the way to go.
PS: Basically, I read the lectures in the Berkeley review, and tried to do as many problems from there as well as EK as possible. In addition, I dedicated substantial amounts of time to learning the formulas. The practice tests in themselves were a form of studying, and the Gold Standard exams, while a gauntlet, were great at getting me familiar with a certain style of problem. Calculations on the actual MCAT felt much easier by the time I had finished the Gold Standard tests.

VR: Verbal was tough, and remains one of the toughest sections of the MCAT. I got a 6 on my first diagnostic for verbal, which was fairly scary as it is notoriously hard to improve upon. I consider myself a reader too... anyways, I just consistently worked on verbal going through as many practice verbal tests that I could get my hands on. I tried to have at least 2-3 verbal tests a week for the 2nd month that I was really focusing on the MCAT, and by the last month, I had enough left over that I was basically taking a practice verbal test every day. I think my postgame analysis of this section helped me improve so much. I would look at every problem that I got wrong, reason why I got it wrong, reason why the right answer was better, come up with a tip for next time, and compile all the tips together so that I could review them for next time.

BS: This section was interesting, because it had both my best and worst sections combined. I did really well in Ochem, and I also mentored Ochem for 2 years, so I was solid on that before even beginning. I reviewed that in only 2 days, using Kaplan. However, the Bio section beyond that was mostly either rusty or completely unfamiliar. I had never even taken Anatomy and Physiology (not offered at my school), so that was an uphill battle. I basically used all available resources on that, from Kaplan to EK to BR to TPR. I would also sketch out all the things going on, and this was very helpful to me in conceptualizing what was going on.


3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
Physics: BR & EK 1001; G Chem: BR & EK 1001; O Chem: Kaplan; Bio: TPR, BR, Kaplan and EK Bio; VR: EK, Kaplan, TPR
I also used the website mcat review.org, which was a useful summary of the things that I needed to know.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
GS 1-10 (with the exception of 7 which is supposed to be unfair). I eventually started skipping the VR section from gold standard, but the other two consistently were about 11-12.
, AAMC 3-11 ranged from 35-39, with a skew towards 35. (36 was my most common score).
AAMC SA- was helpful, ranged from 85-94% on all the different sections, with Bio being lowest, and Ochem being the highest.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Self Designed, mix of global health and chemistry

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Make sure you budget adequate time

AAMC self assessments are useful benchmarks, use them to make sure you know the material before you use, see what you don’t and go review those relevant sections

Don’t underestimate verbal. Make sure if you have time before the test that you build up reading skills, because it is very difficult to improve here unless the fundamentals are already present. Read widely if possible.

List of all the mistakes that you have made. I listed all the mistakes I had made in a book, and then reread them every week or so.

Diagram everything out from memory. This is a good test, especially for bio. You can go through hormones this way for instance, checking that you know all of them and what they do. If you miss one, start over.

Build up stamina on the way, I started studying at a lower clip, and only a month in could I start to do 8 hours solidly of studying. By 2 months in, I was at about 10 hours.

Make sure that you look at the resources before you budget them so that you know exactly how many problems you have. I underestimated this, so I felt like I was rushing towards the end.

Have some things to look forward to. I was volunteering at a homeless clinic, and it reminded me of why I was taking the test in the first place. It is easy to lose perspective, but don't let yourself get burned out.



7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
I studied for one month, just easing myself into it, with about 4 hours per day. For the last two months before the MCAT, I studied about 8-10 hours a day without a single day off. I wouldn't recommend that, I just wanted to get all my practice tests done, and content review in.

Best of luck to everyone :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I have been reading this thread since I was a sophomore in college in hopes for gathering tips in my own preparation for the MCAT, and while my score is not a crazy amazing 35+ score, I hope the lessons I learned over the past few months in studying for this test can help someone achieve the score they desire.

I know the advice for the "sections" will be obsolete in a few months, but hopefully the test-taking skills help for the new test!

---------
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=10 VR=11 BS=10 (composite = 31)
Immediate post test-thoughts can be found here (http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...014-mcat-thread.1071898/page-34#post-15864047)

2) The study method used for each section
I started off studying for this test with SN2ed in May scheduled for an August date. I ended up taking the test in November. I was averse to taking class because of the high price tag that was attached to it, but in retrospect this was one of my biggest mistakes in studying for this exam. I did all of the Berkeley Review books and followed SN2ed to a tee, occasionally skipping re-read days when I fell behind. I took my first FL a few weeks before my originally scheduled test and scored a 22. Just a lesson that following a certain schedule is not going to guarantee you a great score - I continued to take a few more practice tests and found that my AAMC 3 score was not a fluke, and significantly readjusted my practice strategy. I got my hands on EK 1001 and an online Kaplan course and that's when I really started to see score gains.

PS: While BR provided a solid foundation and I am still in undergrad, I found that I literally remembered nothing from general chemistry. I was lucky that I was just out of E&M Physics and knew it really well, but as I reviewed gen chem I found myself being like, "Oh! I know that!" and not spending the time drilling concepts like I should. For this section, you really need to know the basics inside and out. Even post-test, I'm able to help my friends who are taking these classes now - and I got a 10 PS. That's how well you need to know the basic concepts. You don't need to know any crazy details, but you need to know the basics of the subjects tested on here inside and out, because ultimately on the real thing they will ask you questions that test your ability to manipulate your knowledge of the fundamentals and apply them in different situations.

After I failed at SN2ed, picking up EK 1001 changed my life. EK 1001 drills the crap out of basic science concepts. I did all 1001 problems for GenChem and about half the Physics book (all of the areas I was having trouble with) over the course of two weeks. I went from scoring maybe 8-9 on PS to consistently scoring 10. A lot of my issue was that by the time the test actually rolled around, I forgot a decent amount of the nuisanced material EK covers - I did EK 1001 in September and my test was in November, if I had taken it in October I am convinced I would have done better because I would have remembered a lot of the stuff from EK 1001 I forgot. Chad's videos were great for having someone teach you concepts - my friend swears Chad is the reason he improved his PS score, and I felt he was a great supplement. Physics especially.

I also took a ton of Kaplan FLs and that REALLY helped. I had a decently calculation-heavy test, but I didn't feel like it was any different from my Kaplan FLs, and taking the Kaplan FLs really helped prepared me for whatever may be thrown my way on test day. I think that skipping around in PS is a fantastic strategy because checking my answers in PS was always key. In my practices, I found the FLs I had time to check my answers on were the ones I did best on because I was able to catch silly math errors or a missed key word in the question. Kaplan section tests were crucial in helping me nail down PS timing as well.

I really struggled with TIMING on PS. Always start with the discretes and map out your test; this is a Kaplan strategy, and it takes like one extra minute but gives you a ton of peace of mind. Once you have the discretes out of the way, you're no longer in the territory of missing easy questions because you run out of time. As you skip to the discretes, write down what each passage is about and how many questions it has; then, when you're done with discretes you can evaluate what KIND of test you have. Doing this on test day was a GODSEND. I knew what passages were my strengths, what were my weaknesses, and which were the "tough" passages so I could tackle those last, instead of floundering around trying to figure out which passages to spend more time on. I originally had a lot of difficulty with PS timing as well, and in mapping out my passages, I would give myself 14 minutes per 2 passages - some passages require less than 8 minutes, some require more, and this is a way to handle that without messing up your time entirely. This also allowed me to skip around in PS, which was really helpful as coming back to questions, I often found the answer after having some time to let the question stew in the back of my head. In terms of reading the passages, sometimes you really need NO information from the passage. I personally used to take a lot of time reading passages in PS, and on test day I just looked at the questions first and went back as necessary - you can tell what passages need the passage and what don't. Don't waste your time reading every single passage to a T.

VR: I completely neglected this section up until a few weeks before my test because I am a voracious reader, and the neglect showed. VR is different from normal "reading", and I did not take a lot of humanities classes as an underclassman to prepare me for answering questions about what I read. I started off doing a few passages from TPRH Verbal everyday, but my score on AAMC 3 VR after doing this was a 6 and I didn't even finish all of the passages. If I could do it over, I would use both TPRH VR and EK 1001 VR and do ENTIRE tests. EK 1001 is not representative of AAMC or the real thing, but it prepares you to handle questions. I also know it's stressed on here to do just a few passages a day, but I think to build up your stamina and test taking ability, you should stimulate a VR test weekly or as often as you need to depending on how much time you're studying for. I was consistently scoring 7-8 before my test, I literally never broke 8, but it was more of a time issue than the actual question style; I was genuinely sure I would have to retake because of this section. I had a fundamental inability to move on from questions and skip around. Post-gaming is great in figuring out how AAMC asks questions, but there's a certain point where it just no longer helps either in my opinion. The night before my test, my friend who is amazing at verbal suggested that I just cut myself off at 8 minutes per passage and take an educated guess on the questions that I was waffling on. The only test I ever did this on was my real exam, and I got an 11. Take that as you may.

Frankly, verbal is a crapshoot and I think I just got lucky - but it helped me in verbal to start thinking about WHAT the passage is actually about and writing down the main idea, then tackling the questions. Just read the passage, and read quickly. I spent~2-3 minutes understanding the passage, and more time on the questions because I always felt I had to jump back, even when I had an understanding of the passage. You don't always need a "strategy" for verbal, this is a section that just needs practice practice practice, and a clear head. On test day, being wise with my timing and POE helped me the most.

BS: I am a teaching assistant for physiology and I teach lab/recitation for general biology I, so I REALLY neglected this section initially, and I had significant content gaps in the topics in this section I had never seen before, such as immunology. I spent way more time on ochem than necessary - I think BR ochem is overkill and I wasted way too much time trying to memorize reactions I literally don't even remember nor did I see on my test, or even any other AAMC for that matter.

I think that teaching genbio I while I was studying for the MCAT helped my score at least a point or two because I have never taken biochemistry or upper level molecular biology classes outside of molecular genetics, and a lot of the questions on my test correlated well to what I was teaching my students. This section is also a lot of scientific data analysis rather than concepts, imo, and while you need to have a basic understanding of the concepts, having a research background or having read a lot of experimental research papers will help you the most. I didn't have as much trouble with convoluted bio passages that wanted you to interpret the passage as I did discretes; having more foundational content would have been the thing that helped my score the most. I was so focused on getting my PS score up that I neglected bio content a lot in the last 2ish months leading up to my test. Also, EK 1001 Bio and Ochem are fantastic. I did about 1/2 of Ochem, and a little bit of EK 1001 Bio. If I had finished EK 1001 Bio my score would have been higher for sure.

I would also recommend mapping out all the body systems (physio-wise) - I ran out of time studying to do this, but I think this would have really helped me with a few discretes. Again, just study the basics here, but I think you could easily score 10-11 if you had solid test-taking skills through extensive practice. I wish I had studied my notes from my physiology class a lot more as well - I relied far too much on "MCAT" study materials for this section, when in reality you just need to know the material.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
I originally started out with SN2ed and supplemented with Chad's videos. All the BR books and EK Biology. I would not recommend this, but I speak as someone who is still in undergrad and had this stuff decently fresh. BR goes VERY in-depth, and while mastering BR will get you a great score, I was missing literal basics when I started taking FLs. BR doesn't do as great of a job (in my opinion) of stressing the basics, or at least not in a way that worked for me. SN2ed was not the best schedule for me, not conducive to my study or learning style. People swear by SN2ed and I was sure that doing that schedule would guarantee me a fantastic score. I have multiple friends who did it and got 35+ scores, but just be aware that not one study schedule works for everyone. This is not an undergrad class where the more material you cram into your head or the more you study will get you a better score. This is about studying smart to understand basic foundational knowledge and being able to apply it.

After SN2ed, I got access to a Kaplan class, and did EK 1001 which is what I attribute most of my score gains to. Kaplan is fantastic. I can't speak for any of the other testing companies, but when I initially started studying I was discouraged by many people from taking a class, and I really wish I had taken one. If I could do it over, I am sure that having a class would boost my score at least a few points - or at least have allowed me to study for this test in a shorter period of time. The immense amount of study material you have access to makes the price tag worth it, as well as the support system that comes with taking an in-person class. Additionally, having an instructor to be able to ask questions to would have been phenomenal. I used to the MCAT study q&a section on here a lot (and I thank SDN for the fantastic help I was given!), but I'm someone who really gains more out of asking questions than staring at material and learning it myself. I need someone to explain things I don't understand, and a class would have been really useful here. Having the Kaplan FLs was amazing, and Kaplan SECTION TESTS are phenomenal. Section tests are the REASON I was able to fix my timing in all my sections and actually even FINISH the test, and they really helped prepare me for the first. Kaplan BS is the best prep out there in my opinion for the current test, and Kaplan PS is fantastic as well. I did two Kaplan VRs and found them incredibly different from AAMC, but I felt that post-gaming Kaplan VR helped me navigate humanities passages a lot better. In VR, I always struggled with the natural science passages (which is the opposite of most people, lol) and Kaplan wasn't of great use here.

EK 1001 is underrated. For me personally, I was like "oh, this is stupid basic stuff that I know" - did I really know it? No. EK 1001 called me out on my BS and made SURE I knew the basic stuff. I was lacking basic, foundational knowledge due to focusing more on the details of BR, and EK 1001 drills the basics you need to know. If I could do it over, I would start studying with a LOT more EK 1001. It was just too much to keep with in SN2ed to do the BR passages properly and EK 1001, so I cut it out - but when I picked it up again in August, I was kicking myself for not having done it sooner. Chad's videos were great for the basics as well, but I originally did not really use him the right way when I was doing SN2ed. When I sat down and straight up only paid attention to his videos for concepts I was struggling with, he's a great resource.

Additionally, my friends and I joke that you literally need to "live" the MCAT. Start thinking about how things apply in daily life. I will literally never look at my world the same again because of all the science knowledge I have drilled into my brain from studying for this test. The MCAT came up in absolutely everything I was doing for almost 7 months, and that's the moment where you know you have your foundational knowledge - you know everything to a point where you can literally apply it to anything. Referring to old textbooks and notes is also fantastic, if you felt you have notes from taking some of these classes that you can still understand. I didn't refer to my phys notes till like three weeks before my test, and if I had used them a lot earlier I feel that my BS content would have been way better.

4) Which practice tests did you use?
All the AAMCs, Kaplan 1-3, 4 Kaplan PS section tests, 4 Kaplan BS section tests, 3 EK 1001 verbal tests.
Take AAMC 11 before you take AAMC 10. That test demoralized me like no other.

AAMC 3 (late July) - 22 (8PS/6VR/8BS)
AAMC 4 (early August) - 23 (8PS/8VR/7BS)
AAMC 5 (taken in sections without timing, early August) - 28 (9PS/11VR/8BS)
AAMC 7 (September) - 27 (10PS/8VR/10BS)
AAMC 8 (early October) - 30 (12PS/7VR/11BS)
AAMC 9 (mid October) - 31 (10PS/11VR/10BS) - I had to stop this test in the middle and thought my VR score was skewed as a result
AAMC 11 (weekend before my test) - 24 (7PS/8VR/9BS)
AAMC 10 (two days before my test) - 25 (9PS/7VR/9BS)
Kaplan FL 1 - 9PS, 9BS (did not take VR)
Kaplan FL 2 - 11 PS, 10 BS (did not take VR)
Kaplan FL 3 - 33 (13PS/10VR/10BS)

As you can see, my scores were literally ALL OVER THE PLACE. I also had a serious issue with sitting down and taking the full test because I had anxiety about getting scores. While simulating testing conditions is important, I think more important than that is building up the stamina to take three full sections in a row with each section timed. I am living proof you cannot put stock into your practice tests as I think I had serious test anxiety on 10/11, and I took the real thing with absolutely no pressure. The practice tests I took with no pressure were also the ones I did best on. Also, section tests to help with test conditions were just as good as full practice tests.

I only completely simulated two tests under exact test taking conditions (AAMC 8 and AAMC 10) and I did not feel that this hurt me on test day. Test day is COMPLETELY different. You just can't simulate the kind of "realness" you feel when you sign the fact that you're taking the "Medical College Admissions Test." That kicked me into high gear so much more than the anxiety I felt with any practice test. I guess my approach to this is the fact that you've taken a ton of tests in your life, and while this is completely different, if you have an IDEA of what you're getting into - you will be okay. That's just me though.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Neuroscience

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
Be kind to yourself. This is literally JUST a test. It's a piece of the medical school puzzle and I honestly felt slightly entitled when I started studying - I have a decently high undergrad GPA and as a result, I thought the MCAT would be cake. It was not, at all. I was supposed to take this test on August 21st and I took it on November 7th. While shooting for a high score is great, if you're not a standardized test taker like me, it's good to remind yourself that a non 35+ score is not going to keep you out of medical school.

Learn the basics. Starting with BR, I neglected this profusely and it showed. Take an AAMC before you start studying so you know what the test is like. Yes, you don't want to waste FLs, but I had NO IDEA what the test was like until I took a FL two months into studying and it was COMPLETELY differently from what I thought it was going to be. Additionally, be open to changing your study style. You may think you know how to study, but the most successful people know how to adapt. This test is unlike anything else...it's like a final over everything you've learned for three years/multiple pre-med requisites. What may have worked for your classes may not work in studying for this. I know it didn't for me, and the fact that I kept trying to study the same way made me pretty miserable for a few months. The minute I switched it up to accommodate for the fact that it was something completely different was when I saw changes. There is also a point where you have TOO much study material. Over the summer, I was doing a BR chapter a day with respective Chad's videos and it was just. too. much. I wasn't processing anything and learning. It's okay if you don't use the best study materials for every section. Just find what works for you and run with it. There is no best study method, no best study materials, you just have to figure out what works for you. Some people can study for the MCAT in two weeks, some need multiple months - this is all dependent on how good of a test-taker you are, your foundational knowledge, multiple other factors. While it's super stressed to !!keep doing practice!!, this was a waste of my time from May-August because I didn't even know the material I was doing questions for. You should be exposed to MCAT questions, but you have to have foundational knowledge first.

DON'T PUSH YOUR DATE TOO MUCH. There comes a point where you just need to grit your teeth and take it. I started studying with the expectation that I wanted to be one and done, and continued to push my test date because I didn't want to take it till I felt "ready."

Fun fact, and my post-test thoughts on the November 7th test have this story in detail, but I was going to void my test on test day. Having taken AAMC 10 and 11 with terrible scores so close to my test date, I was an absolute mess by test day. I was sick of studying, and moreso I felt like a failure because I had been studying for so long and hadn't taken the test. I was going to just not go to my test because I was so terrified of getting a subpar score and it's commonly accepted on here to "trust your average." Well, my average was awful, so logically I felt that I shouldn't take it. While that is great advice if you're consistently scoring lower, my scores were literally all over the place, and I should have known myself. I peak on test day under the pressure of knowing "this is the real thing." After I took AAMC 10, I was convinced that I would not be scoring my test and was looking into canceling and taking the 2015 test. The day before, I went out to dinner and my friend planted the seed that I should score my test because I had studied for so long - having one crappy score on my transcript would not kill my dreams of being a doctor. I woke up the next morning still about 80% sure I was not going to be scoring. When I got to the test center, it just felt incredibly real - and while I felt no different on the real thing than I had on multiple practice tests, I scored my test. This was also partially because I knew I had done my best with what I had available - I had managed my time well, I was not anxious AT ALL while taking it, and if I did do poorly it would be a true reflection of my abilities rather than some test day fluke. I was calculating my AAMC average while staring at the void screen and was convinced scoring it was a bad idea at the time, but I wanted to stop being so obsessed with getting the score of my dreams. There is a part of me that believes that medical schools make us take this test to have us stop being so obsessed with certainty and perfection.

Getting my score was probably the most pleasant surprise ever as I spent the month convincing myself it would be okay to retake in 2015 and recovering from the intense burn out that was studying for this test for 6 months. I think this just goes to say that no practice test ever can predict your test day performance, and this test is half psychological. Now, I'm not saying that if you're consistently scoring low 20s you should go in and expect a miracle, but I had scored in the 30s before, I knew the material, and the amount of pressure I was putting on myself by November to get a certain score and consistently feeling "entitled" to a 35+ score was deterring me from peak performance. I also had been studying for 6 months and at that point it was ridiculous to even think about pushing my test. The ultimate goal is to be a physician, and while going to a top 20 school would be a phenomenal dream come true, even a 45 wouldn't guarantee you that. While it would significantly help your chances, believe in the fact that this process is more than just your MCAT score. YOU are more than your MCAT score, and your intelligence is more than this score.

Lastly, and in my opinion the most important one, a support system. My friends were my rock during this ordeal. This test sucks balls. There's no other way to put it. Having regular perspective outside of it was critical. I started studying with a friend who was taking it the same day as me in September, and found my motivation shooting way up. I loved studying while I had classes because I had something to distract me outside of the MCAT. Getting tunnel vision is the worst thing that you can do during this test because it will burn you out, and quick. Having people that are there for you when you get a 22 on a practice test, are willing to listen to you talk about practice passage scores, and listen to your fears while supporting you is crucial. A lot of the time I didn't listen to my friends and family when they gave me advice about this test because I felt that they "didn't get it" - but in the end, their confidence in me was warranted and necessary. It's impossible to study for this thing without an outlet, at least it was for me.

SDN was a huge savior as well; I particularly have to thank @sillyjoe, @orangetea, @TexasSurgeon, and @SwedishMD2B. As corny as it is, this website was a great place to find support in the madness that is the pre-med world. I didn't know a ton of older pre-meds or people who had taken the MCAT, and it's a great resource to find answers. That being said, don't get too caught up in how other people are doing. SDN is first of all not a representation of the real world (small sample size), and secondly, it's supposed to be a resource. If you find that it's more deterring than it is helpful, get off. At the end of the day, only you know yourself.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
May-November (6 months) ~30 hours/week over the summer, 15-20 hours/week during school, with a 2 week break in August.

This was overkill, and if done correctly, I think 4 months of studying is enough. I was told to take time off and focus my energy solely on the MCAT, but this hurt me a lot early in the summer. I was thinking about only the MCAT and had no other distraction which made my studying less productive, I wasn't a happy PERSON, and it showed in the fact that I lost motivation to study by the end of July and burned the F out. I also started studying after a particularly rough semester - school ended April 27th and I picked up MCAT books in May 1st - and I was burned out. Don't study for this while you're burned out and avoid burn out as a whole. I didn't really believe in burn out until I studied for this test.

-------
This was super long, but if you made it through, congrats! I hope this helps someone out there.
And remember, you can do it. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 16 users
1) Your individual scores and composite score.
12/9/12: 33 composite (wrote several months ago)

2) The study method used for each section.

My own, which consisted of going through TBR and their practice questions for about a month. Then I did practice tests and other study materials for another month.

3) What materials you used for each section.

TBR for all except verbal. TPRV hyperlearning and online material for verbal and other practice questions.

4) Which practice tests did you use?

AAMC 8-11. 11 was most representative with slightly easier physical section than you will see on the real MCAT.

5) What was your undergraduate major?

Chemistry

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Make sure you have taken cell bio, biochem and genetics (2nd yr) before taking the MCAT. AAMC says that you just need bio, chem, o-chem and physics but that is simply false. Take your time on the verbal section: each word should mean something. So don't skim.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

Roughly 2 months
 
Test Date: 7/25/2014
FL AAMC Average: 29-30
Post-test expected score: 12-13/5-9/10
Actual Score: ( PS / V / BS): 32 (13/9/10)

Comments: I am a retaker from 5/8/2014. Previous score was a 26 (9/8/9). I used a compressed 1-month version of sn2ed's study program, which I will share here for anyone that is interested.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Books/Materials to use:
TPR Bio chapters 2-6 (molec. bio/genetics)
EK Bio chapters 4-8 (physiology)
TBR Organic Chemistry
TBR Physics
TBR Gen. Chem
EK101 VR
TPR Hyper-learning VR
AAMC CBT 9-11
TBR CBT 1-3

- I did 2-3 passages of VR everyday except for the last week.
- Make sure you spend time going over every practice question you do and really understand it. It is really helpful to go over the practice questions the next day, rather than the same day.
- 1/3 refers to every 3rd passage and free standing question (just like in the sn2ed program)
- I did not have time to do "hat-trick". I think it is a brilliant Idea though. If you do some searching on sdn you can find an excel sheet for it.
- I substituted EK101 or TPRH VR for the TBR CBT VR. The TBR VR is weird IMO.
- I retook 2 AAMC CBTs just to get comfortable with the timing. Take scores with a grain of salt.

This is a general summary of what I did:

Week 1:
M - Ch. 2 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 1 Orgo and 1/3
T - Ch. 1 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 1 gen. chem + 1/3
W - Ch. 3 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 2 Orgo and 1/3
Th - Ch. 2 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 2 gen. chem + 1/3
F - Ch. 4 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 3 Orgo and 1/3
S - Ch. 3 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 3 gen. chem + 1/3
Su - Catch-up day

Week 2:
M - Ch. 5 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 4 Orgo and 1/3
T - Ch. 4 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 4 gen. chem + 1/3
W - Ch. 6 TPR bio and corresponding passage/free-standing ?s; Ch. 5 Orgo and 1/3
Th - Ch. 5 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 5 gen. chem + 1/3
F - Ch. 4 EK bio (starting with the nervous system - skip over the eukaryotic cell stuff) and corresponding 30 minute exam; Ch. 6 Orgo and 1/3
S - Ch. 6 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 6 gen. chem + 1/3
Su - Catch-up day

Week 3:
M - Ch. 5 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam; Ch. 7 Orgo and 1/3
T - Ch. 7 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 7 gen. chem + 1/3
W - Ch. 6 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam; Ch. 8 Orgo and 1/3
Th - Ch. 8 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 8 gen. chem + 1/3
F - Ch. 7 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam
S - Ch. 9 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 9 gen. chem + 1/3
Su - Catch up day

Week 4:
M - Ch. 8 EK bio and corresponding 30 minute exam; TBR CBT 1 (substitute EK101 VR or TPRH VR)
T - Ch. 10 Phys + 1/3; Ch. 10 gen. chem + 1/3; go over TBR CBT 1
W - TBR CBT 2 (substitute EK101 VR or TPRH VR)
Th - Go over TBR CBT 2; Take any AAMC CBT (9-11)
F - Go over AAMC CBT; Take TBR CBT 3
S - Go over TBR CBT 3; Take any AAMC CBT (9-11)
Su - Go over AAMC CBT
 
AHHH I'm in your position! Got a 27 (7/11/9) on 7/12/14 I had to finish a a Physio Upper div and Lab to graduate but it was only offered during the first summer session :( I meant to study for just the mcat but my test ended up being in the middle of midterms so i know i didnt study very well. Anyways I'm taking it again on 01/08/2014 so this timeline is perfect! I'm hoping for a 30 but my i took TBR6 and go a 28 (8/11/9) i'm a little discouraged but seeing that you were able to do it gives me hope!!!
 
1) Your individual scores and composite score.
13/9/11: 33 composite

2) The study method used for each section.

Kaplan review online all the way! The in class stuff wasn't the most helpful for me, but I got an extension to keep using the online material and after 2-3 months of studying 4-5 hours a day it finally paid off.

3) What materials you used for each section.

Kaplan online (mostly for practice tests) as well as Khan Academy for some of the more complicated topics in the science portions.

4) Which practice tests did you use?

AAMC 3-11. Average 35
Kaplan 6-8. Average 37

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Neuroscience with Biology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Take as many practice tests as you can, while keeping your practice test environment as similar to your test center as possible. For verbal, just keep practicing everyday... (I scored below my VR average, little bummed). Stay positive!

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

2 months intense studying, but began looking at the MCAT a year ago.
 
This is from my exam I took back in early 2014. I wonder if this thread will ever get looked at again now that the new MCAT is coming. Probably not.

Your individual scores and composite score.

BS=10. PS=8. Verbal =13. TOTAL = 31

2) The study method used for each section.

kind of all over the place. Tried and abandoned plenty of methods. Most helpful: Had a tutor for like 24 total hours spanning a few months (I think it was 2 hours at a time) from Varsity Tutors (MUCH cheaper than the big companies). We did only physical sciences for the most part as that was my weakest area. I had a lot of material to learn and for better or worse, I did more content review than questions.

3) What materials you used for each section.

physical science: my tutor and JCoReview videos. biology: princeton review books and some online stuff. verbal: Just some practice, mainly focusing on explanations **only** from AAMC (practice tests and the "AAMC assessment" thing they sell). I would do TPR sets for practice but I didn't even bother reading why I got certain ones wrong for them (YES for AAMC). I knew verbal would be my strong point (liberal arts major).

4) Which practice tests did you use?

AAMC and TPR. AAMC average was 29 I think (excluding diagnostic, scores were between 27 and 32). TRP average was probably like 22 haha. I'm not kidding. I think got a 19 on one of the TPR practice exams a month before my real test. No worries....

5) What was your undergraduate major?
NON SCIENCE. Liberal arts. non trad.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Know your weaknesses and know what you do NOT understand. Be introspective and humble when approaching each topic. Don't get blindsided by this thing. AAMC averages are the best. It's ok to go into the test not feeling comfortable about a certain topic (but better to address it early on). Just make sure you don't just *think* you know so-and-so topic just because you've "learned" it once (or twice, or three times) before. Make sure you know the topic inside and out by doing some simple, discreet practice problems. Don't just say, "oh i made a silly mistake, moving on...." Do similar problems until you get it right on the first time. It is ok (and wise) to search for other methods of learning for topics you don't really understand.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?

1 month of studying 8-12 hours every day, and before that like an additional 2 months studying maybe 5 hours a week. I am not a very self motivated study kind of person and the only thing that kept me on track was my tutor (at least in the time leading up to the final month before the exam). Also, it was good to have a tutor because I felt more comfortable revealing that I didn't understand something he taught me (more comfortable than say, in a group setting).
 
Last edited:
1) Your individual scores and composite score
First: PS=9 VR=9 BS=10 Total=28 :confused:
Retake: PS=11 VR=11 BS=13 Total=35 :soexcited:

2) The study method used for each section
Self Studied with EK for my first test (my background just wasn't strong enough)

Followed SN2ed's schedule for my retake pretty religiously.
Exceptions to this were:
1) No hat trick, just loads of flashcards all the time (If I was smart I would have used Anki)
2) No daily Verbal, just a big verbal block on my "off" days (My problem was endurance, could not keep my eyes open during verbal :sleep:)
3) TPR Bio instead of EK (EK has no depth)

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
EK, then TBR and TPR Bio

4) Which practice tests did you use?
A free EK test, some old paper Kaplan tests, then for retake AAMC tests. (Spend the $$$, its worth it)

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biology

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
Learn the Information the first time, take a ~3 month period off and do SN2ed's method. No one is bulls***ing you. It sucks up time like nobody's business, but it works.
Take lots of breaks. Break up the day with flashcards, run, family & SO.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
10 weeks (~4 hours a day) then 3 months (~7 hours a day)
 
Not sure how much this will help anyone with the new MCAT coming up but in case it does:
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS=14 VR=10 BS=15 Composite=39

2) The study method used for each section.
I kept an excel doc with what I had planned for each day and any comments such as scores on practice questions, practice MCATs, etc. Basically, it boiled down to 1 chapter per day from prep books or a practice test every day for about 3.5months (I probably took 10-15 days off total throughout that period). This helped me because I was doing something concrete all the time and it gave me a timeline of where i would be if i kept up with the schedule throughout. I felt adequately prepared going into exam day and i don't think more time would have been helpful. I studied over summer break. I had 40hr/week rotations then 20hr/week research during this time frame as well as some intermittent volunteering, so you don't need to put your whole life on hold for the MCAT as long as you can prioritize time well. I did take the last 2 weeks before test day off though - definitely important for the psyche because you won't be able to concentrate and put good effort into anything else.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
PS: TBR
BS: EK supplemented with TBR for Bio and the MCAT wiki page for Bio as well.
VR: EK101 passages

4) Which practice tests did you use?
-All the AAMC exams
-Gold Standard exams 1-10 (replaced the VR sections with the EK101 tests though)
-Free Kaplan and TPR tests

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Pharmacy. Took the exam in the summer between my 4th and 5th post-high school years.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
I'm not sure how to help you with VR as mine did not improve throughout my studies. Best thing i can say is find a good strategy for how you will look over practice VR tests and learn from them. Then stick to it everytime you take an exam. For everything else, make sure you are timing everything you are doing. The MCAT isn't about how much you know - you need to be working quickly constantly. If you train yourself this way you will be fine for time come test day. Also, if you start to feel burnt out take a day off (obviously don't get ridiculous with this but you know what i mean). If you aren't being productive in your studies you might as well worry about your health and overall being by doing something else that day.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
3.5months. Can't say how much per day but I always made sure i was accomplishing my tasks. Some days that would be 3hr and some days it would be 12hr depending on how much time i had free that day.
 
Last edited:
Re-Take 30 achieved! For all the Re-Takers out there - DO NOT LOSE HOPE! You can do it. :)

1) Your individual scores and composite score
2nd Attempt (December 6 2014): PS = 11 / VR = 9 / BS = 12 / Composite = 32
1st Attempt (August 15 2014): PS = 10 / VR = 9 / BS =9 / Composite = 28

2) The study method used for each section
PS: I did fairly well in my undergraduate courses for General Chemistry and Physics, so I was feeling somewhat confident for this section. However, for my first attempt on the MCAT, I actually did take a TPR course - I found that listening to the lectures and paying close attention again as a refresher helped a TON to just lock all the concepts in. Then when I was preparing for my second attempt, I did only problems and simply reviewed the concepts (and the logic required to get the question correct) for the questions I got wrong to make sure I understood it 100%.

BS: I was not a biology major, and unfortunately, due to personal circumstances, was unable to really absorb and learn biology in undergrad - therefore, I knew this would be the area in which I would need the most help. On the bright side, the TPR instructor was a really good lecturer who just explained things really well and also went at a fast pace to make sure the class got in everything we need to know for the MCAT concept-wise. I will admit that during the study period for the first MCAT, I did more reading than problems for the BS, just because I did not know enough. As for ochem, I took it during senior year of college (worst choice ever - DO NOT RECOMMEND), so it was still pretty fresh in my mind - and I would take MCAT ochem over undergrad ochem any day (MCAT ochem tends to be very experiment-oriented, so stuff like extractions, TLC, gas chromatography, etc). During my second take, I knew more concepts like the back of my hand, so I focused more on problems - I found it really helpful after my first take to really buckle down and do more problems.

VR: Practice, practice, practice. I really didn't do much outside reading, I just practiced with all the verbal practice passages I could find - mainly EK and TPR, because I usually read on a normal basis (highly recommended for those struggling with reading speed).

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
I used Princeton Review, ExamKrackers, and Berkeley Review.
The Princeton Review books were really good for concept and content review during my first MCAT.
The second time around, I only used ExamKrackers for problems and really quick refreshers on problems/chapters that I got a lot wrong on. After I reviewed all the topics like that, I used Berkeley Review for the bulk of all my practice problems. Personally, I found that the critical thinking required to answer the Berkeley Review questions was the most similar to that I faced on the real MCAT, if not a little tougher. But hey - when the tough problems get manageable, less tough problems get easier, right?

4) Which practice tests did you use?
From my TPR course, I had access to all the AAMCs. Admittedly, I only did AAMC5 and beyond, along with TPR 1~4 for my first MCAT. I averaged around 29.
The second time around, I did TPR5 and re-did all the AAMCs 5 and beyond and got anywhere between 30 to 35 and averaged around a 33. Of course, I'm sure there was some familiarity involved with the AAMCs, but I think the extra problems and deeper understanding of the science really helped me feel more confident and I guessed on less of the problems. As for verbal, well... verbal is verbal.

5) What was your undergraduate major?
Public Policy. With the Pre-Med track, so I did the pre-reqs with a non-trad major. It was painful.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
For those re-taking the MCAT, re-doing the practice tests will definitely seem like a trick. After all, you've already done these tests - and you probably do remember some stuff. But to be real, there is no way you remember EVERYTHING. Each test is 144 questions, and granted, you might remember the content/context of the problems, but at the point of a retake, your goal is to feel more confident while testing. Instead of trying to remember what the ANSWER was to a problem you recognize, throw that out the window and pretend you are starting from the beginning. Face each problem set with science and try to logic each question out.

When I was taking my second MCAT, I was reminded of the fact that the MCAT tests critical thinking, not just what you know. The MCAT isn't trying to see if you can regurgitate. Unfortunately, they want more than that. Fortunately, a lot of what you need to solve problems are hidden in the passages. Of course, some problems in the PS can be solved with pure math/problem solving. However, I felt this more in the BS section of both my MCATs - a lot of the answers could be reached with logic and the information the MCAT provided in the passages, whether they be facts or graphs or tables. So if you ever feel like "hey this problem is just unreasonable," try looking deeper in the passages.

During my first MCAT, I was miserable. It was summer vacation, I had just graduated from college, and the LAST THING I wanted to do was lock myself up in my room and study. But I did it. And I didn't do as well as I wished. A lot of this was probably attributed to the fact I just didn't know enough (especially biology), but I felt that during the second MCAT, I ...sort of enjoyed the process. I really tried to change my attitude towards the test. Yeah, I had to take my finals in my post-bacc program along with my MCAT, and that sucked. But it was really refreshing and satisfying whenever I did well on a set of problems or my AAMCs. And studying for the MCAT began to be less of a torture and more of a logic game. Or a critical reasoning puzzle. I think that the attitude you have while you study is really important. If you're miserable and hate the world and blame the MCAT for all the woes in your life as you study, then yeah - the process will suck. But when you become more forgiving of the MCAT and change your perspective, then you'll find that it'll suck.......less. And become almost....do I dare say it? Fun.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
First take - 9 weeks, ~9 hours a day.
Second take - 6 weeks, ~9 hours a day.

TL;DR: Most importantly, try changing your attitude toward the MCAT. It can be fun, I promise. Like a puzzle. For those who are re-taking, GOOD LUCK. Seriously, I understand how MUCH it sucks, and how unnerving it is - all the what if's are terribly burdening. However, it'll all pass, and your efforts will pay off.
Kick the MCAT in the rear, all of you. Double that, actually.
 
1) Your individual scores and composite score
PS 13 VR 11 BS 13 Total 37

2) The study method used for each section

PS:
TBR Physics books 1 and 2.
  • I read each chapter twice -- the first time to get a general understanding and the second time to mentally tie together concepts from within the chapter and previous chapters.
  • Next I took very minimal notes on only the basic equations and relations I needed to know. The concepts were memorized/understood already at that point.
  • Last, I completed all of the end of chapter problems.
Examkrackers 1001 Physics Problems
  • I did 333 of these at the end of week 2, 334 of these at week 3 and 334 in the final week of studying as a physics refresher. They were quick and easy (maybe 90 minutes to complete 333 problems) and served as good refreshers.
Examkrackers Chemistry
  • Same as strategy as TBR Physics.
Examkrackers 1001 Chemistry Problems
  • Same strategy as Examkrackers 1001 Physics Problems
BS:

Examkrackers Biology
  • Read each chapter three times. The first time for general understanding, the second time with detailed notes on all information worth memorizing. The third time to mentally tie together concepts.
  • Next I completed the end of chapter problems and reviewed.
Examkrackers 1001 Biology Problems
  • These were gold, but took longer to complete than the other Examkrackers 1001 books. I did 200 a day for 5 days taking time to review not only problems but understanding of concepts.
Examkrackers Organic Chemistry
  • Read each chapter twice. The first time for general understanding and the second time to take detailed notes.
  • Next I completed the end of chapter problem and reviewed.
Examkrackers 1001 Organic Chemistry Problems.
  • I did 200 a day for 5 days taking time to review not only problems but understanding of concepts.

VR: Did not practice or review this at all. The only practice I ever got was from practice tests.

3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)

Examkrackers for everything except TBR for physics. If you have the time, I would also recommend TBR for chemistry and nothing else.

4) Which practice tests did you use?

Gold Standard 1-4, all 8 AAMC exams.

I took one per day and reviewed the same night.

5) What was your undergraduate major?

Biology. Undergrad major really has no bearing on MCAT performance.

6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?

Spend the time to get the basic knowledge down, but understand that the MCAT is a test of reasoning. The amount of knowledge needed for the MCAT is really small. I went into the test knowing the most basic concepts only. I did not memorize specifics because I didn't need to. When you take the practice tests you will see this.

Learn how the test writers think and how they formulate questions. That's the most important part of doing well.

7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
4 Weeks, 7 Hours per day. Total time ~200 hours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Ugh, this empty post will be at the top of the page forever. Can it be deleted?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top