- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Messages
- 3,218
- Reaction score
- 663
If you truly want to be in independent practice with just 4 years of schooling, go become a dentist.
A friend of mine is getting her DNP.
She is getting it because there is a serious shortage of nursing faculty worldwide, much less nation wide. She wishes to continue to teach at the University level and since every other faculty (History, English, Economics, you name it) for the most part requires professors to have their doctorate she must as well.
Believe it or not, every time a nurse tries to achieve higher education it is not because they are trying to take jobs away from doctors...
Perhaps you guys would like nurses keep sitting at the back of the education bus.
Back Nurse, Back! D@mn you.
A friend of mine is getting her DNP.
She is getting it because there is a serious shortage of nursing faculty worldwide, much less nation wide. She wishes to continue to teach at the University level and since every other faculty (History, English, Economics, you name it) for the most part requires professors to have their doctorate she must as well.
Believe it or not, every time a nurse tries to achieve higher education it is not because they are trying to take jobs away from doctors...
Perhaps you guys would like nurses keep sitting at the back of the education bus.
Back Nurse, Back! D@mn you.
In my opinion, a profession does itself no favor by degree creep. If you have stratification of the profession, then the top degree means something and it will be valued more. A PhD is more valued and respected than a master's because people assume, usually correctly, that a person has to be smarter, more dedicated, and more capable to complete a PhD versus a master's. Most people can do a master's, but only a small percentage of people can do a PhD. If everyone in the profession has the same degree, then it's really hard to differentiate the top people from the bottom ones. A single DPT among many bachelor PT's is impressive. A DPT among many DPT is not. Hence, the value of that degree will never reach the level that it could be. That's why the DPT and PharmD salaries are not that much different than their bachelor counterparts. A DNP is not worth more than an NP. No wonder some NP's were pissed about the creation of the DNP.
If you truly want to be in independent practice with just 4 years of schooling, go become a dentist.
Even though I know you have been told this many times, I will remind you that a DNP is a minimum of 6 years with most schools requiring at least a year of full time clinical experience in between the BSN and entry into the DNP program.
Most faculties will not accept a BSN and the applicant must currently have a NP already. The requirements into MOST NP programs are a BSN along with a minimum of 1 year full time work as an RN.
So to put it into simple terms so you do not get confused again...
1) Most programs require a NP degree first which is a minimum of 6 year degree not including the minimum 1 year full time work in acute care...so basically 7 years.
2) the DNP is another 2 years on top of that.
So a for most programs a DNP will have had 8 years of school (almost all of it practice based) and a minimum of 1 year acute work in between.
Basically 9 years.
Hmmm. Does not sound so airy-fairy to me.....
*Yawn* Typical nursing spin.
4 of those years are college. I might also add that nursing school is not difficult either. I've reviewed the material you learn and what your tests are like. It's at the level of high school biology. I don't mean it to be an insult. I understand that they have to keep the material at simplified level so that most students can graduate. You have people from all sorts of backgrounds and abilities going into nursing. Make the tests hard and too many will fail. It's not necessary to test nurses that hard since they won't be making diagnosis and treatment decisions. Executing orders doesn't require much intellectual prowess. That's why they are able to offer NP and DNP degrees online. If the degrees were more rigorous, that would never be possible.
Working full-time earning a salary and not having to study and take tests is not considered part of schooling; it's called job experience. Sure, a medical resident gets paid, but he has to attend didactics, be evaluated rigorously, see and do so many such and such, has to study constantly because he's tested. Do you do those things when you work full-time? No, you just punch the clock and get paid.
DNP is 3 years of classes and 1 year of "residency" or whatever you call it during which you also happen to be working full-time and yet get credit for it. That's a sweet deal, eh?!! The extra classroom year they tacked on to the DNP curriculum is mostly seminars and fluffy stuff. Very little substance.
It's painfully obvious to everyone except horsenut that the DNP is a political creation and not one of true substance. That's why in the end the DNP=NP, except it will take longer and cost more.
Have you always been such a challenge. I recall a thread discussing the personalities of MDs, I am guessing you hope to be in surgery? You clearly fit the stereotype.
I might also add that nursing school is not difficult either. I've reviewed the material you learn and what your tests are like. It's at the level of high school biology. I don't mean it to be an insult. I understand that they have to keep the material at simplified level so that most students can graduate. You have people from all sorts of backgrounds and abilities going into nursing. Make the tests hard and too many will fail. It's not necessary to test nurses that hard since they won't be making diagnosis and treatment decisions. Executing orders doesn't require much intellectual prowess. That's why they are able to offer NP and DNP degrees online. If the degrees were more rigorous, that would never be possible.
Lol. Don't shoot the messenger if you don't like the message. People who have gone through both nursing and medical school will say the same thing. There's no comparison.
I don't think that is the issue in the least. No one is saying they are comparable. They are two different foci in the field of health care. Both valid, but not equal. Neither is 'better' or higher, or whatever you wish to say. In your defensive, knee jerk, nursing ignorance you attack any attempt by the nursing profession to achieve higher education and recieve validation for work they have done for many decades.
So get over it already and see the big picture here.
There is nothing wrong with more education as it pertains to nursing.. But nurses are attempting to become medical providers without "medical training" as it is known.
SO, what pertains to nursing? What is medical? What is AT? Over the years what was once done by MDs is now by nurses, Pharmacy and AT. Where do you draw the line in education? Who dictates what is taught by whom?