- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 0
Most bacterial and human cells are alike in:
a)the ability to produce ATP through ATP synthase
b)The chemical composition of their ribosomes
c)their enclosure within cell walls
d)the shape of the self-replicating structures that carry their DNA
I got it down to A and B, and I KNOW that ribosomes are smaller in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes. They are however, all made up of rRNA, correct? That is, they're all made of nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen, and whatever amino acids are made up of. Apparently not, and the explanation was more or less that the bacterial ribosome is smaller (made of two different sub units, which I knew..). Is this really the chemical composition though? If the question had stated same type of ribosome, it would have been a red flag. But the answer is A. And now of course I agree with it b/c it's true and if I knew that to be true, I would have chosen it, but is my reasoning of the definition of "chemical composition" reasonable?
a)the ability to produce ATP through ATP synthase
b)The chemical composition of their ribosomes
c)their enclosure within cell walls
d)the shape of the self-replicating structures that carry their DNA
I got it down to A and B, and I KNOW that ribosomes are smaller in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes. They are however, all made up of rRNA, correct? That is, they're all made of nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen, and whatever amino acids are made up of. Apparently not, and the explanation was more or less that the bacterial ribosome is smaller (made of two different sub units, which I knew..). Is this really the chemical composition though? If the question had stated same type of ribosome, it would have been a red flag. But the answer is A. And now of course I agree with it b/c it's true and if I knew that to be true, I would have chosen it, but is my reasoning of the definition of "chemical composition" reasonable?