Although there is still time in the cycle, I have only been invited to osteopathic med school interviews thus far, so I am contemplating the consequences of being a DO in pursuing a career being part-physician part-researcher. Specifically, I would like to conduct clinical (EDIT: I guess I don't want to rule out basic or translational research, though) global health research.
I know that choosing an osteopathic school will/may limit me in some ways: getting into highly competitive ACGME residencies and practicing at an academic powerhouse. I'm not concerned with the former, as I'm not too interested in Radiology, Dermatology, etc. anyways, and I'm fine with a decent mid-level ACGME residency in my field of interest. However, since research is an interest of mine, I feel like I may be doing myself a disadvantage by handicapping myself from being competitive at large academic institutions. Another concern may be being able to obtain research grants? I read some personal anecdote somewhere on SDN where a grant giving entity ignored an application because it included a DO. Is this prevalent or an isolated case? Lastly, in the realm of global health, is the question of being recognized abroad as a physician as a DO, but from researching on SDN, I don't think that's a huge thing.
However, I have no clue as to whether I'm making this out to be a bigger deal than it is. It's difficult to gauge possible stigma against DOs in the academic environment because of:
1. Self-selection within DOs for primary care and not for research careers.
2. Looking at the low numbers of DOs within large academic institutions is not helpful because of the above caveat and also because of the smaller proportion of DOs to MDs in the physician population in general.
And I have no better sources.
In the end, yes, it's all about what I make of med school and being proactive to seek out those opportunities myself. I could probably carve out a place in the field for myself being a DO, but I want to be informed about possible roadblocks.
Does anybody have better insight into this?
I know that choosing an osteopathic school will/may limit me in some ways: getting into highly competitive ACGME residencies and practicing at an academic powerhouse. I'm not concerned with the former, as I'm not too interested in Radiology, Dermatology, etc. anyways, and I'm fine with a decent mid-level ACGME residency in my field of interest. However, since research is an interest of mine, I feel like I may be doing myself a disadvantage by handicapping myself from being competitive at large academic institutions. Another concern may be being able to obtain research grants? I read some personal anecdote somewhere on SDN where a grant giving entity ignored an application because it included a DO. Is this prevalent or an isolated case? Lastly, in the realm of global health, is the question of being recognized abroad as a physician as a DO, but from researching on SDN, I don't think that's a huge thing.
However, I have no clue as to whether I'm making this out to be a bigger deal than it is. It's difficult to gauge possible stigma against DOs in the academic environment because of:
1. Self-selection within DOs for primary care and not for research careers.
2. Looking at the low numbers of DOs within large academic institutions is not helpful because of the above caveat and also because of the smaller proportion of DOs to MDs in the physician population in general.
And I have no better sources.
In the end, yes, it's all about what I make of med school and being proactive to seek out those opportunities myself. I could probably carve out a place in the field for myself being a DO, but I want to be informed about possible roadblocks.
Does anybody have better insight into this?
Last edited: