- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,745
- Reaction score
- 1,785
3rd stage is delivery of the stylet.1st stage of intubation is laryngoscopy, getting that view of the cords
2nd stage of intubation is when the PVC passes cords (which is more stimulating)
3rd stage is delivery of the stylet.1st stage of intubation is laryngoscopy, getting that view of the cords
2nd stage of intubation is when the PVC passes cords (which is more stimulating)
3rd stage is delivery of the stylet.
3rd stage is delivery of the stylet.
Was going to say placenta but opted for stylet to make the joke a little more obscure.hahaha ok? do you force your stylet past the vocal cords?
6 years?I’m the junior guy in my group- 3ish months out from training. I like to think I was well trained over six years, but still try and remain open to advice and guidance. I’ve also been really pleasantly surprised at the old-timers who are super interested to see and hear about new approaches to old problems.
Sounds hokey, but the longer you can keep the learner mindset, the better.
Was going to say placenta but opted for stylet to make the joke a little more obscure.
@Nivens did cardiac and critical care fellowships, so yes, 6 years.6 years?
6 years?
Fourth stage is egress of the anesthesiologist from the OR as soon as the correct delivery of the tube has been confirmed.
Ouch. Too soon.Don't forget to turn on the sevo. Don't do it WashU style.
Before I let a new trainee attempt using a Miller blade, I tell the story of "wax on, wax off" in the Karate Kid. I then tell them I am giving them a snow shovel and tell them I am going to send them out to shovel the steps of every public building in town. I then draw the parallel of how they are going to shovel the tongue and epiglottis out of the way to see the larynx. I also point that none of our blades are a crowbar.
Carly Simon actuallyNobody Does it Better by Sheena Easton
Carly Simon actually
People say this, but it’s only because their instruments need a straight path to the cords, doesn’t mean it always gets a better view, although I do think it is a superior blade if DL was all you had ….Hung like a 5 miller… If MACs are so much better. Why do ENT rigid bronchs look like Miller blades? I don’t use the miller blade often. Its DL with mac hand me the tube or bougie, fail then videolarygoscopy.
We still have mac 3.5'sThe original IV Mac 3.5 was my instrument of choice. If needed, the Rusch gum bougie would do the trick. It was a tragedy when they stopped importing them to the US and the IV Mac blade was modified.
The original IV Mac 3.5 was my instrument of choice. If needed, the Rusch gum bougie would do the trick. It was a tragedy when they stopped importing them to the US and the IV Mac blade was modified.
Hung like a 5 miller… If MACs are so much better. Why do ENT rigid bronchs look like Miller blades? I don’t use the miller blade often. Its DL with mac hand me the tube or bougie, fail then videolarygoscopy.
We do actually have a laryngoscope that is used like a Macintosh (Lindholm). It's used identically with pressure in the vallecula on the hyoepiglottic ligament. The advantage of the Lindholm is that doesn't distort the natural anatomy of the supraglottis or glottis, so it's useful for things like supraglottoplasties or vocal fold injections.
Lindholm:
View attachment 345882
That being said, our most common difficult airway scope is a straight, narrow blade (Hollinger anterior commissure scope). It is great at slipping around tumors, large tongues, narrow mandibles, edema, small mouth openings, etc. It is advanced past the epiglottis and can probably give a better view than any non-video laryngoscope in an anterior larynx.
Hollinger:
View attachment 345884
All things considered, anybody who does a lot of airway work needs a lot of tools in their toolbelt. In the ENT world, there is no "one size fits all" laryngoscope (the Dedo is a happy compromise between a lot of factors which is why it's our most commonly used scope).