- Joined
- Oct 1, 2012
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 2
I have a question about atomic radius. Usually, the general rule is that Cations are always smaller than Anions, meaning Anions are always bigger than Cations, do you agree?
If we are comparing two elements, let's say [Ar] and Molybdenum (Mo4+) (Molybdenum here let's hypothetically say that it has lost 4 electrons) so it is now cation.
Which atomic radius is bigger?
I would think that Argon [Ar] is smaller because it's all the way on the right side and [Mo] is closer to the left side (bigger atomic radius)
However, because Mo lost 4 electrons, the atomic radius is smaller than Ar?
This doesn't make sense to me because doesn't Mo have more shells than Ar? [meaning it should be bigger]
Can someone tell me what they think the answer is between a transition metal that has lost its electrons (now cation) and an element on the far right, which is supposed to be smaller, but in this situation, bigger.
I hope my question makes sense. Thanks
If we are comparing two elements, let's say [Ar] and Molybdenum (Mo4+) (Molybdenum here let's hypothetically say that it has lost 4 electrons) so it is now cation.
Which atomic radius is bigger?
I would think that Argon [Ar] is smaller because it's all the way on the right side and [Mo] is closer to the left side (bigger atomic radius)
However, because Mo lost 4 electrons, the atomic radius is smaller than Ar?
This doesn't make sense to me because doesn't Mo have more shells than Ar? [meaning it should be bigger]
Can someone tell me what they think the answer is between a transition metal that has lost its electrons (now cation) and an element on the far right, which is supposed to be smaller, but in this situation, bigger.
I hope my question makes sense. Thanks