I was trying to look at the relationship between Bernoulli's Eq and the Continuity Eq that I came across this anomaly. This is a very important concept and I need help with this specific case attached.
Bernoulli does in fact contradict continuity PROVED
- Thread starter StrongG
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 2,127
- Reaction score
- 2,276
explain?
Edit: Can't read the scratch.
Edit: Can't read the scratch.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
- Messages
- 200
- Reaction score
- 109
@StrongG @theonlytycrane hey guys, I was looking over some bernoullis stuff today and I think I have also noticed that contradiction and it is extremely frustrating.... Take a look at this problem, I posted just today at http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/can-someone-please-explain-this-pressure-question.1211959/ Got the right answer but the more I looked at it, just confused me even more, if you guys can understand it please let me know!
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
- Messages
- 200
- Reaction score
- 109
Continuity only works in a pipe that is closed, once you have an open hole for instance it is useless and only bernoullis works.... continuity is a very specific property and only works in certain cases, bernoullis is more universal.
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 42
nvm
Last edited:
Nope! According to the Eq Rho*g*h(1) is on the left side with a positive value, and Rho*g*h(2) on the right side with a positive value. And since h1 > h2 according to my case, Rho*g*h will end up being positive on the left side.
Nope! According to the Eq Rho*g*h(1) is on the left side with a positive value, and Rho*g*h(2) on the right side with a positive value. And since h1 > h2 according to my case, Rho*g*h will end up being positive on the left side.
