- Joined
- Aug 31, 2008
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 0
My prep book states the following:
"Although Bernoulli's equation tells us that pressure is inversely related to cross-sectional area, it is evident that this is not the case in blood vessels."
I fail to see where in Bernoulli's equation this implication is made, but if I look at the Continuity Equation Q = Av where Q is the volume flow rate, A is the cross-sectional area, and v is the velocity of a fluid, it is easy to see that cross-sectional area is inversely related to velocity. From Bernoulli's equation P + pgh + (pv^2)/2 = K, we see that pressure is inversely related to the square of velocity. Since A is inversely proportional to v and v^2 is inversely proportional to P, doesn't this mean that P is directly proportional to the square of A? If anyone can explain the statement my book makes, I'd be very grateful.
"Although Bernoulli's equation tells us that pressure is inversely related to cross-sectional area, it is evident that this is not the case in blood vessels."
I fail to see where in Bernoulli's equation this implication is made, but if I look at the Continuity Equation Q = Av where Q is the volume flow rate, A is the cross-sectional area, and v is the velocity of a fluid, it is easy to see that cross-sectional area is inversely related to velocity. From Bernoulli's equation P + pgh + (pv^2)/2 = K, we see that pressure is inversely related to the square of velocity. Since A is inversely proportional to v and v^2 is inversely proportional to P, doesn't this mean that P is directly proportional to the square of A? If anyone can explain the statement my book makes, I'd be very grateful.