Curious about BR's logic here. The molecule in quest is 1,2,3D-cycohexanol (all facing out of page). it asks how many deuterium will have axial orientation in most stable conformation of the molecule.
They say that the C-D bond is shorter than C-H. My problem with this question is that a shorter bond doesn't really tell you whether or not the D or H is the more sterically hindered moiety. I'm assuming from the question that they think H is more sterically hindered than D, since the correct answer has 2 deuterium axial, and therefore only one equatorial. I guess you could assume that the longer bond for C-H makes it more "bulky" but from orgo class I know that you can't always easily predict the steric bulk of side-groups off cyclohexane.
any clarifications? I'm pretty good on cyclohexane/ring-flips/etc but this one caught me for a loop. Thanks.
They say that the C-D bond is shorter than C-H. My problem with this question is that a shorter bond doesn't really tell you whether or not the D or H is the more sterically hindered moiety. I'm assuming from the question that they think H is more sterically hindered than D, since the correct answer has 2 deuterium axial, and therefore only one equatorial. I guess you could assume that the longer bond for C-H makes it more "bulky" but from orgo class I know that you can't always easily predict the steric bulk of side-groups off cyclohexane.
any clarifications? I'm pretty good on cyclohexane/ring-flips/etc but this one caught me for a loop. Thanks.