Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So there are a plethora of accounts for why diagnostics are not meaningful. Particularly Sn2d's argument comes to mind. I took a diagnostic today as it is required by our pre health committee at my school. I scored a perfectly balanced 30. The argument against diagnostics is that they artificially provide low scores. Does anyone believe they can do the inverse (i.e. can they artificially provide a good score)? I'm not taking this to mean I don't need to prepare. Obviously I want to score as high as possible, but does a decent score on a diagnostic indicate a strong starting point or is the consensus that regardless of score it is meaningless? If it helps, it was the Kaplan diagnostic.
