- Joined
- Dec 2, 2014
- Messages
- 280
- Reaction score
- 373
You're super pretentious. I don't dig it.hm....
You're super pretentious. I don't dig it.hm....
deleted the post, don't want to completely hijack the thread. Point was to show the pros of an easier school and how you can spend your time in other areas that can benefit you down the road. Definitely not bashing a hard school though, it came off life I was.
You can do both but there's no arguing that the easier school will allow you to do more of the non-degree things that you are interested in, for me it was learning the business side of dentistry.
Btw, when I say "prestigious" universities, I mean tier 1 schools like all the Ivy League schools, MIT, Duke, UChicago, Johns Hopkins, Vanderbilt, etc, NOT some state schools like Ohio State or University of Florida. The only state school that's nationally recognized as "prestigious" is UC Berkeley, in my honest opinion. So unless you go to one of those tier 1 schools (aka Top 20 PRIVATE), please don't bring up your undergrad experience to make a point against attending an easier school. It's just comical.
Hey, if you consider UC Berkeley prestigious then you'd have to shoehorn in UF, OSU and a few others since their all considered "public ivies."
Berkeley is levels ahead of UF and OSU. It's ranked number 3 in the world at least by US news and consistently ranks top 25 in the world by most ranking reports.
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...restigious-difficult-undergrad.1126717/page-2
Oh I have no doubt, just throwing it out there that there is a category that groups them all together, including UMN and a few other schools. Clearly UF/OSU/UMN aren't the pinnacles of academic achievement but they are better than a lot of other schools.
Hey, if you consider UC Berkeley prestigious then you'd have to shoehorn in UF, OSU and a few others since their all considered "public ivies."
Oh, I'm sorry, did you actually attend any of those "non-prestigious" schools? I go to OSU and our education is top notch. You're so incredibly closed-minded and arrogant. THAT'S what's comical. I would never tell anyone who goes to UF, for instance, that they're not receiving a wonderful, prestigious education. Let the DAT determine that. Oh, and OSU is one of the top 20 public schools in the country, it's incredibly cheap, and has produced a mass amount of important people. So bye.Btw, when I say "prestigious" universities, I mean tier 1 schools like all the Ivy League schools, MIT, Duke, UChicago, Johns Hopkins, Vanderbilt, etc, NOT some state schools like Ohio State or University of Florida. The only state school that's nationally recognized as "prestigious" is UC Berkeley, in my honest opinion. So unless you go to one of those tier 1 schools (aka Top 20 PRIVATE), please don't bring up your undergrad experience to make a point against attending an easier school. It's just comical.
:troll:Oh, I'm sorry, did you actually attend any of those "non-prestigious" schools? I go to OSU and our education is top notch. You're so incredibly closed-minded and arrogant. THAT'S what's comical. I would never tell anyone who goes to UF, for instance, that they're not receiving a wonderful, prestigious education. Let the DAT determine that. Oh, and OSU is one of the top 20 public schools in the country, it's incredibly cheap, and has produced a mass amount of important people. So bye.
:troll:
If you don't go to a Tier 1 school, you're a peasant.Oh, I'm sorry, did you actually attend any of those "non-prestigious" schools? I go to OSU and our education is top notch. You're so incredibly closed-minded and arrogant. THAT'S what's comical. I would never tell anyone who goes to UF, for instance, that they're not receiving a wonderful, prestigious education. Let the DAT determine that. Oh, and OSU is one of the top 20 public schools in the country, it's incredibly cheap, and has produced a mass amount of important people. So bye.
Pretty muchIf you don't go to a Tier 1 school, you're a peasant.
If you're a science major or pre-professional, you're learning the exact same material at every single school. Why? Because science is about published facts.
Ooooh, someone is bitter.
The material in the textbooks is of course the same. The level of difficulty on an exam? The fact that you have to do better than at least half of the brilliant students in the room to get a B-?
It would absolutely blow you out of the ballpark
Funny thing, we were comparing text books and assignments over Christmas break with friends attending a wide range of schools, small LAC (me and a few others), major huge U's, several Top 20 schools and a few Ivys (friends from high school). Guess what, we all had the same text book for Chem, Bio and O Chem....hummmm. Bonus is, the small LAC grads will graduate with no debt, we are more involved in our schools, hold more leadership positions, have more volunteer time and have all had extensive shadow experience. Those at the Top 20's/Ivy's have yet to get any leadership positions, have no volunteer time and are struggling finding dentists near campus to shadow (or dr's because some of them are pre-med). The small LAC's had 100% placement into med/dental last year (and for the last several years).....so, moral of the story, go where feel you can be the best all around student and don't worry about the name on the sweatshirt....
This has got to be a troll
I happen to think those students who end up in the health profession and attended whatever "prestigious" undergrad perhaps aren't the sharpest tools in the shed. They end up in the same profession but just spent three times as much money (or likely their parents' money) getting there.
Here are some secrets about "prestigious" schools that no one who attends one wants to admit. If you're a science major or pre-professional, you're learning the exact same material at every single school. Why? Because science is about published facts. And there is no material that Harvard has access to that North Dakota Community College does not. Is there some undergraduate organic chemistry concept that Tufts has access to that Auburn does not? Certainly not something in an undergraduate course. And what about the "prestigious" professors at MIT? Well, there's a reason they're "prestigious" and it's not because of their educational aptitude. It's because of how well funded their research is. And for the vast majority, your classes get in the way of their research. But maybe they do care. What are they ultimately teaching you? Kreb's cycle or maybe some upper level molecular biology? Wikipedia and Molecular Biology of the Cell can teach you that. And don't tell me that at your "prestigious" school, high grades are harder to achieve. That implies some knowledge of many, many colleges that you do not attend and thus know nothing about. Your school doesn't curve? Well I guess, according to you, your school is the only school in the world to give you grades directly corresponding to the amount of tested material you know. The tests are harder? Relative to what other schools that you've attended? The professors expect more out of you? That's quite the indictment on the thousands of PhD-carrying professors across the country.
You can get a great education everywhere. And getting admitted into professional school is all about the individual.[/QUOT
I agree to an extent. I have met some students at big schools qho are dumb as rocks but went on to prof school. But those who are actually smart or hardworking, what if they wanted to attend a prestigious school? Maybe their parents went there or they were awarded a scholarship to help pay for that prestigious education.
Ooooh, someone is bitter.
The material in the textbooks is of course the same. The level of difficulty on an exam? The fact that you have to do better than at least half of the brilliant students in the room to get a B-?
It would absolutely blow you out of the ballpark
Tests, in general, are definitely harder at top tier schools.
I happen to think those students who end up in the health profession and attended whatever "prestigious" undergrad perhaps aren't the sharpest tools in the shed. They end up in the same profession but just spent three times as much money (or likely their parents' money) getting there.
Here are some secrets about "prestigious" schools that no one who attends one wants to admit. If you're a science major or pre-professional, you're learning the exact same material at every single school. Why? Because science is about published facts. And there is no material that Harvard has access to that North Dakota Community College does not. Is there some undergraduate organic chemistry concept that Tufts has access to that Auburn does not? Certainly not something in an undergraduate course. And what about the "prestigious" professors at MIT? Well, there's a reason they're "prestigious" and it's not because of their educational aptitude. It's because of how well funded their research is. And for the vast majority, your classes get in the way of their research. But maybe they do care. What are they ultimately teaching you? Kreb's cycle or maybe some upper level molecular biology? Wikipedia and Molecular Biology of the Cell can teach you that. And don't tell me that at your "prestigious" school, high grades are harder to achieve. That implies some knowledge of many, many colleges that you do not attend and thus know nothing about. Your school doesn't curve? Well I guess, according to you, your school is the only school in the world to give you grades directly corresponding to the amount of tested material you know. The tests are harder? Relative to what other schools that you've attended? The professors expect more out of you? That's quite the indictment on the thousands of PhD-carrying professors across the country.
You can get a great education everywhere. And getting admitted into professional school is all about the individual.
General Consensus: Don't go to some random po-dunk liberal arts college or an Ivy, go to a state school/public ivy and save money while still going to a school that has name recognition?
There it is! Words cannot express how great this comment is.Y'all already gave up on the importance of prestige when you chose to become a dentist over a MD.
Y'all already gave up on the importance of prestige when you chose to become a dentist over a MD.
Dentistry is one of the most noble and most prestigious professions in the world, just not as much as medicine. So your claim that one "gives up" on prestige when choosing dentistry is simply not true. In a 1989 study on occupational prestige by Davis et al., dentists ranked right near judges and professors.
By that logic, everyone to whom prestige is important must go to Harvard, not even Yale or MIT.The point made with that comment was not that dentistry is not prestigious. It was that if prestige is so important that not attending a "prestigious" university is robbing oneself, then choosing dentistry over medicine is as well.
By that logic, everyone to whom prestige is important must go to Harvard, not even Yale or MIT.
my personal opinion: if you're obsessing with where you went to undergrad if you're a pre-dent (or any pre-health professional student) is just dumb, first off. if you have the $$ and drive, go wherever you want, but just know at the end of the day you're getting a DDS/DMD. it really doesn't matter where you go.
take the time to think---why do you think AADSAS (or any other application service) standardizes gpas using their own scale? you send in your transcript, they standardize it, give you some numbers. these are the SAME numbers that dental schools see. a B is a 3.0 on AADSAS no matter where you go.
take it from someone who was a non-trad applicant at one time and has been classmates with people from everywhere (yes even harvard)---it means nothing. you can argue that a more prestigious school gives you more opportunities, etc. but it's not true. arguing in favor of that just proves that you have an ego. the question at the end of the day is how much money are you willing to spend to satiate your ego?
going to a more prestigious school would only probably help you for dental school if there was a discrepancy on your application: i.e. high DAT score and a low gpa. the adcom might give you the benefit of the doubt in certain situations. other than that, if you're not on the borderline in the app process, it's all about numbers.
(btw the benefit of the doubt thing--it's actually true).
I would also say that if they had to compare 2 applicants with the same stats, ec's, etc, then the adcom may give preference to the the applicant with the better alma mater...unless that applicant was a jerk.
I'm not saying to avoid prestigious schools but I know a lot of friends who went to public ivies (which you can say are prestigious among public schools) who have swore on their life that their undergraduate education gave them the tools needed to succeed in dental school. The rigors of that school allowed them to fair better in dental/medical school.
public ivy is a stupid term. you have the ivy league, which originally started as a sports conference, and then you have state schools.
disclaimer: i went to a ''public ivy''.
I would also say that if they had to compare 2 applicants with the same stats, ec's, etc, then the adcom may give preference to the the applicant with the better alma mater...unless that applicant was a jerk.
I'm not saying to avoid prestigious schools but I know a lot of friends who went to public ivies (which you can say are prestigious among public schools) who have swore on their life that their undergraduate education gave them the tools needed to succeed in dental school. The rigors of that school allowed them to fair better in dental/medical school.
It's 'cause Public Ivies are the best