EM docs in Michigan justifying replacing their anesthesiologist colleagues

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Now EM anesthesiologists.

What did we think was going to happen when we said medicine is a capitalist system and we invited private corporations to partake in the fun?

Perhaps now HCA can open an EM "sedation" fellowship where an EM doctor has to both supervise an ED while also supervising a midlevel supervising a tech giving sedation in an "OR" (converted trauma bay where they now charge OR facility fees) for any case that comes from the ED. Perhaps even do it in a stand alone urgent care next to a Starbucks in a strip mall? The EM docs should be careful what they wish for.
 
Perhaps now HCA can open an EM "sedation" fellowship where an EM doctor has to both supervise an ED while also supervising a midlevel supervising a tech giving sedation in an "OR" (converted trauma bay where they now charge OR facility fees) for any case that comes from the ED. Perhaps even do it in a stand alone urgent care next to a Starbucks in a strip mall? The EM docs should be careful what they wish for.

I love where you are going with this. Having the ER staff a trauma bay converted to OR for level 1 type traumas would be a dream come true. Those cases are miserable time sucks. Be careful what you wish for.
 
Your friend should never have agreed to be "standby". If I get called for an airway I'm doing it.
I agree with you. If they ever call for you to be standby on an airway. Just tell them you have chest tube in PACU that you would like them to on standby while you do it.
 
What’s the captain liabilty aspect? Either you are the guy that does it or the guy that watches.
You make business decisions at this point in regards to liability. Do u draw urself into this mess or not.

I’m sure 1/4 of us have been name as peripheral names in lawsuits at one point in any 20-30 year career. It’s just the laws of averages working. That’s what I mean as locums doc plus trying to not involved yourself in a rescuer situation for someone who f’d up the airway.
 
This is the clown. Looks like he failed out of ortho residency and then did emergency medicine. Next thing he is going to be saying ER docs are uniquely able to perform ortho surgery because they do ortho reductions and splinting in the ER.View attachment 410278
He was probably promised some c suite role or something and sold out for this. What an idiot.
 
I love this. They can't hack their own ****ty job so think they can replace us. **** the bed the second they got a real case without a million back up ppl...

I just cant wait for the 1st court case and then we really find out how brave they are...

Theyve literally never done an elective case. That's some shakey ground right there to assume insurance will cover their ass
 
I love this. They can't hack their own ****ty job so think they can replace us. **** the bed the second they got a real case without a million back up ppl...

I just cant wait for the 1st court case and then we really find out how brave they are...

Theyve literally never done an elective case. That's some shakey ground right there to assume insurance will cover their ass
If they are judicious-only use CRNAs who have at least five years experience and are above average and limit to PS1 and 2 and select PS 3 and routine cases... They can get away with a lot for maybe a long time. Maybe have anesthesiologists in the department not involved with the case as the fire department... How many of us would actually say "NO" when asked to come help a dying patient in another OR that they weren't involved in because they didn't like the staffing model?
 
I don't see the advantage of hiring EM to do sedation in a hospital when you have anesthesia already in house. Seems like a turf war anesthesia with anesthesia.
 
I don't see the advantage of hiring EM to do sedation in a hospital when you have anesthesia already in house. Seems like a turf war anesthesia with anesthesia.
They are hiring them to provide “physician supervision” for CRNAs doing more than sedation. Basically a meaningless rubber stamp of independent CRNA practice.
 
They are hiring them to provide “physician supervision” for CRNAs doing more than sedation. Basically a meaningless rubber stamp of independent CRNA practice.
Im confused. So the GI docs are over seeing the Grand Rapids crnas? But the EM docs are over seeing the crnas?
 
Im confused. So the GI docs are over seeing the Grand Rapids crnas? But the EM docs are over seeing the crnas?
That was my interpretation of the article. I may be wrong though. GI docs oversee CRNAs all the time so not newsworthy IMO. Again, I may be wrong.
 
That was my interpretation of the article. I may be wrong though. GI docs oversee CRNAs all the time so not newsworthy IMO. Again, I may be wrong.
Didn't Michigan opt-out of the supervision requirement a bit ago? What's the problem then?
 
Im confused. So the GI docs are over seeing the Grand Rapids crnas? But the EM docs are over seeing the crnas?
No. EM docs are solo in endo giving propofol sedation.
I got friends there right now doing locums. Absolute circus from what I hear- locum docs are now getting canceled a week after starting because hospital overbooked.
 
No. EM docs are solo in endo giving propofol sedation.
I got friends there right now doing locums. Absolute circus from what I hear- locum docs are now getting canceled a week after starting because hospital overbooked.
My two friends have not gotten canceled yet.

Crnas are getting canceled left and right. Because there are 2-4 crnas many days sitting around floating and not assigned.

Calls are solo for docs at night. Hard to run up 160 hours a week with solo calls there. That’s why I avoid places like that. Play the long game if u wanna make real locums money.

U can get solid 12-15 hrs a day there though so the money is good.

One locums doc making $430/hr did get canceled last week.
 
My two friends have not gotten canceled yet.

Crnas are getting canceled left and right. Because there are 2-4 crnas many days sitting around floating and not assigned.

Calls are solo for docs at night. Hard to run up 160 hours a week with solo calls there. That’s why I avoid places like that. Play the long game if u wanna make real locums money.

U can get solid 12-15 hrs a day there though so the money is good.

One locums doc making $430/hr did get canceled last week.

what are they paying? I meant to call the agencies to ask
 
what are they paying? I meant to call the agencies to ask
I literally just told u guys what the guy getting canceled was getting paid.

There are guys making a little more who are staying (for now). There are guys making a little less as well.

Anyways. When you chase locums jobs like this. It’s like chasing hot stock. Your luck will vary how long it rides.
 
My two friends have not gotten canceled yet.

Crnas are getting canceled left and right. Because there are 2-4 crnas many days sitting around floating and not assigned.

Calls are solo for docs at night. Hard to run up 160 hours a week with solo calls there. That’s why I avoid places like that. Play the long game if u wanna make real locums money.

U can get solid 12-15 hrs a day there though so the money is good.

One locums doc making $430/hr did get canceled last week.
Yeah the ones I know who got canceled refused to go to other sites and don't want to sit their own cases- so inflexibility is the main reason.
 
As a board certified pediatric anesthesiologist I can start my own plastic surgery clinic and operate as much as I want. Heck I can even start doing general surgery, ENT and Derm procedures in my office if I had the ego. But I can’t get malpractice insurance.

Are these EM doctors able to be insured for doing anesthesia? Is Corewell health self insuring?
On the other side of the insurance equation, are these EM doctors able to be reimbursed for doing anesthesia?
 
The CMS document goes on to state that hospitals “must establish policies and procedures, based on nationally recognized guidelines that address whether specific clinical situations involve anesthesia versus analgesia” and “address whether the sedation typically provided in the emergency department or procedure rooms involves anesthesia or analgesia.” Hospitals would be free to use ACEP guidelines and recognize them as authoritative. Furthermore, if sedation administered in the ED is termed “analgesia” (which it is), it would not fall under anesthesia-services oversight. The CMS document allows for this carve out for emergency medicine by stating that “it is important to note that anesthesia services are usually an integral part of surgery.” ED sedation is unique, and the credentialing and verification of competency of providers, selection and preparation of patients, informed consent protocols, equipment and monitoring requirements, staff training and competency verification, criteria for discharge, and continuous quality improvement should be overseen by emergency medicine.

 
ACEP organized a multidisciplinary effort to create a clinical practice guideline specific to time-sensitive unscheduled procedural sedation, which differs in important ways from scheduled, elective procedural sedation. This guideline, which outlines the underlying background, rationale, and issues relating to staffing, practice, and quality improvement, is a resource for practitioners who perform unscheduled procedural sedation, regardless of location or patient age. Read the guidelines and FAQs
 
On the other side of the insurance equation, are these EM doctors able to be reimbursed for doing anesthesia?
I wondered that as well. Do they just use anesthesia CPT and ICD codes?
 
One Lawsuit can ruin your life and career. Those ER guys are being very very foolish without verifying their malpractice insurance will cover routine, elective anesthetics outside the ER. Wouldn't it be cheaper to hire a bunch of CRNAs at $250 per hour to do the anesthesia solo? The ER docs have to be getting at least $200 per hour. Once you start practicing another specialty you are expected to deliver the same standard of care as that specialty and typically insurance companies DO NOT cover malpractice incidents outside your area of certification.
I would rather to sit my axx home watching netflix than being forced to practice out of my specialty and potentially dragged into a multiple year lawsuit.
 
I love where you are going with this. Having the ER staff a trauma bay converted to OR for level 1 type traumas would be a dream come true. Those cases are miserable time sucks. Be careful what you wish for.
Continuity of care. ER Doc should escort the trauma pt to OR and c/w the anesthesia, lol
 
They are hiring them to provide “physician supervision” for CRNAs doing more than sedation. Basically a meaningless rubber stamp of independent CRNA practice.

But what's the advantage? EM hourly pay is competitive with anesthesia.
 
ACEP organized a multidisciplinary effort to create a clinical practice guideline specific to time-sensitive unscheduled procedural sedation, which differs in important ways from scheduled, elective procedural sedation. This guideline, which outlines the underlying background, rationale, and issues relating to staffing, practice, and quality improvement, is a resource for practitioners who perform unscheduled procedural sedation, regardless of location or patient age. Read the guidelines and FAQs

Hiya Blade! Missed seeing your posts. Short of gross negligence, a single lawsuit won't ruin your career if you have malpractice insurance. I will admit that it's not pleasant. I've been sued before, even though I was not at fault for a bad outcome. Pharmacy administered the wrong dose of lamotrigine >> horrific case of SJS that was life-altering. The patient was aware of the risks of skin rashes, consented to treatment, and did not seek care or follow up with me when they first had symptoms of SJS. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed me from the case with prejudice...but those were some very long two years of my life. Anyone can be sued for any reason. Not sure why EM docs would knowingly put themselves in a situation that increases their liability.
 
Your friend should never have agreed to be "standby". If I get called for an airway I'm doing it.
Yup, never stand by. All it takes it one jackal to write your name down on the chart without your knowledge. Then you are effed.

If any Michigan-based plaintiff lawyers are reading this, we would be happy to assist with the inevitable reviews of these cases.

I’m sure this has already been reported to the MI medical board. These EM guys are nuts.
 
Last edited:
Hiya Blade! Missed seeing your posts. Short of gross negligence, a single lawsuit won't ruin your career if you have malpractice insurance. I will admit that it's not pleasant. I've been sued before, even though I was not at fault for a bad outcome. Pharmacy administered the wrong dose of lamotrigine >> horrific case of SJS that was life-altering. The patient was aware of the risks of skin rashes, consented to treatment, and did not seek care or follow up with me when they first had symptoms of SJS. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed me from the case with prejudice...but those were some very long two years of my life. Anyone can be sued for any reason. Not sure why EM docs would knowingly put themselves in a situation that increases their liability.
Just for the sake of argument what if the insurance company denies coverage completely and the EM physician is left bare/alone? That means all the liability falls on them. Any Physician practicing outside their specialty is playing with fire. The hospital must be self-insuring these EM physicians or in my opinion they are practicing outside their scope of practice by performing elective anesthesia sedation on GI patients. Hence their malpractice coverage should be denied by their carrier. How would you define "gross negligence" in this situation? Again, in my opinion this comes very close to it.

In an emergency situation all physicians should be able to step up and do what it is necessary to help the patient. But in no way is performing an elective anesthetic by an EM physician an emergency situation.
 
Just for the sake of argument what if the insurance company denies coverage completely and the EM physician is left bare/alone? That means all the liability falls on them. Any Physician practicing outside their specialty is playing with fire. The hospital must be self-insuring these EM physicians or in my opinion they are practicing outside their scope of practice by performing elective anesthesia sedation on GI patients. Hence their malpractice coverage should be denied by their carrier. How would you define "gross negligence" in this situation? Again, in my opinion this comes very close to it.

In an emergency situation all physicians should be able to step up and do what it is necessary to help the patient. But in no way is performing an elective anesthetic by an EM physician an emergency situation.

If they are practicing outside their scope, that's on them. But in general, getting sued doesn't end a career.
 
If they are practicing outside their scope, that's on them. But in general, getting sued doesn't end a career.
Getting sued without malpractice insurance coverage isn't to be taken lightly. In some states you may be forced to file for bankruptcy protection.
If one is going to practice another specialty without certification then plan on protecting all your assets from lawsuits.

 
Last edited:
Getting sued without malpractice insurance coverage isn't to be taken lightly. In some states you may be forced to file for bankruptcy protection.
If one is going to practice another specialty without certification then plan on protecting all your assets from lawsuits.

That's the reason why I don't practice gender affirming care, it's outside my scope as an APRN, even though I know more about it than most providers in my state. There's literally 3 people that do the vast majority of the GAC in my state. It's the BON that would come after me for practicing outside of my scope, malpractice would be a secondary concern.

I'm not down playing the importance of having my breakfast coverage. But if you know is something outside of your scope , and your malpractice doesn't cover it, than you have to take accountability for that if a lawsuit destroys your career/finances.
 
If the EM docs are employed they likely are getting their med mal coverage by the medical system
The issue is whether the "system" is self-insured vs an external, independent carrier. If the hospital system is insuring them then it would be highly unlikely they would be denied coverage. On the other hand if the health system is purchasing a policy issued by a carrier then all bets are off that the carrier would accept a physician practicing outside their specialty.
 
Just for the sake of argument what if the insurance company denies coverage completely and the EM physician is left bare/alone? That means all the liability falls on them. Any Physician practicing outside their specialty is playing with fire. The hospital must be self-insuring these EM physicians or in my opinion they are practicing outside their scope of practice by performing elective anesthesia sedation on GI patients. Hence their malpractice coverage should be denied by their carrier. How would you define "gross negligence" in this situation? Again, in my opinion this comes very close to it.

In an emergency situation all physicians should be able to step up and do what it is necessary to help the patient. But in no way is performing an elective anesthetic by an EM physician an emergency situation.
The Grand Rapids anesthesia group is being taken in house w2. I’m sure if the hospitals system is big enough and employ enough physicians they are self insured in an incredibly high policy limit where 99% of settlements can take place.

It’s a business decision by the hospital to let the EM docs provide sedation for GI patients.

At this point. One may argue the real question?

Does an INDEPENDENT CRNA cost more than any physician besides an anesthesiologist? Or do the GI docs don’t want the liability to sign off on the crna if not an opt out state.

It’s a fascinating situation.
 
Does an INDEPENDENT CRNA cost more than any physician besides an anesthesiologist? Or do the GI docs don’t want the liability to sign off on the crna if not an opt out state.

I would say yes; they consider 40 hours "full time" and most cannot imagine working five days in a row, let alone staying late past their contracted shift without demanding time and a half. After hours and weekends? Don't even get me started...meanwhile physicians have call/holidays/weekends "baked" into their salary.
 
I would say yes; they consider 40 hours "full time" and most cannot imagine working five days in a row, let alone staying late past their contracted shift without demanding time and a half. After hours and weekends? Don't even get me started...meanwhile physicians have call/holidays/weekends "baked" into their salary.
ER docs are paid hourly based on shifts model.
 
The Grand Rapids anesthesia group is being taken in house w2. I’m sure if the hospitals system is big enough and employ enough physicians they are self insured in an incredibly high policy limit where 99% of settlements can take place.

It’s a business decision by the hospital to let the EM docs provide sedation for GI patients.

At this point. One may argue the real question?

Does an INDEPENDENT CRNA cost more than any physician besides an anesthesiologist? Or do the GI docs don’t want the liability to sign off on the crna if not an opt out state.

It’s a fascinating situation.
What makes this more fascinating is that Michigan is an opt-out state, they don't need anybody signing off on the CRNAs. Let them all practice independently.
 
What makes this more fascinating is that Michigan is an opt-out state, they don't need anybody signing off on the CRNAs. Let them all practice independently.
Are em docs employed by the Grand Rapids hospital or third party independent or management owned ?
 
I would say yes; they consider 40 hours "full time" and most cannot imagine working five days in a row, let alone staying late past their contracted shift without demanding time and a half. After hours and weekends? Don't even get me started...meanwhile physicians have call/holidays/weekends "baked" into their salary.
You say this like it’s a bad thing. Kudos to them for valuing their time accordingly. We all should.
 
You say this like it’s a bad thing. Kudos to them for valuing their time accordingly. We all should.

It's online, so easy to misunderstand 🙄 ; if you read carefully, I'm saying a CRNA isn't any cheaper than a W2, call-taking doc willing to take a salary for uncertain hours. I am IN NO WAY saying that someone advocating for their quality of life is a bad thing.

It's high time we do the same, and why I only work locums or per diem now.
 
Last edited:
It's online so easy to misinterpret 🙄 ; if you read carefully, I'm saying a CRNA isn't any cheaper than a W2, call-taking doc willing to take a salary for uncertain hours. I am IN NO WAY saying that someone advocating for their quality of life is a bad thing.

It's high time we do the same, and why I only work locums or per diem now.
If administrators were smart. They would and should change w2 work schedules like I’ve been saying for a while.

Just going from 4 doc/13 weeks off to 5 docs/20 weeks for example. Ok…will cost u 500k more

But the alternative is possibly doing 2 of those 4 docs who are tired of all those calls in a 4 doc model. Plus paying equivalent over 1 million per doc for locums while short staff. Is it worth paying 500k for the extra doc in this case?

Same thing with trauma centers. Bring in night team but also make the day docs happy by giving them (4) 10 with a guarantee day off.

There are so many versions of schedules admin can run these days to save money on locums. Till then u can keep taking advantage of mismanagement as per diem or locums.

The best options…pay the w2 staff more money
Pay for w2 and extra staff

Pay for locums.
 
My friend got canceled there today. Was told they hired enough full time employees.
That’s shocking . As right now there are like 2 fte lol.

More like they are over staffed. U can’t have 4-5 free docs and 4-5 crnas sitting around. It’s the truth. I’ve seen the schedule.

But I applaud hospital management for over staffing. So the public doesn’t freak out if surgery gets canceled due to no anesthesia.
 
My friend got canceled there today. Was told they hired enough full time employees.
I was told this was going to happen even before the locums came in- which is why I never entertained the idea. I know most of the locums who came there- good chance I know or have worked with your friend.
 
My friend got canceled there today. Was told they hired enough full time employees.
What? They hired full time replacements for the entire group they just ousted? Already? Maybe there isn't a shortage of anesthesiologists nationwide if something like this could happen? Or maybe these people are defectors from other groups. But if this is true, it's shocking.
 
Top