- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 1
Greetings all. I am starting residency this summer, and at this point am considering doing either a C&A or Addiction fellowship after residency. The area I am from is grossly underserved for both adult and especially C&A psychiatrists. One of my C&A attendings told me that he made $300+ in his first year out of fellowship.
In order to try to recruit psychiatrists, most of the hospitals in the area offer signing bonuses and pay stipends to residents who agree to return to the area and practice. These bonuses/stipends are paid in the form of a loan that is generally forgiven over the course of one year for each year that the stipend is received. Most of these contracts also contain a clause that if a person were to not return, then the loan would be repaid to the hospital at a reasonable interest rate.
My long term goal is to open a private practice in my hometown, but I would like to work in a group practice for awhile after residency. By signing such a contract, I would be able to have a guaranteed job in such a setting and would enjoy the benefit of having handsome cash bonus now and a nice stipend during residency. The main downside that I see, is that I am basically committing to a 5 year contract that probably wouldn't begin for 5 years. Because of the exit clause and the serious shortage (hence, competition) for psychiatrists, I doubt that I would get screwed when my actual employment contract is written in 5 years, but I can't be certain.
So...for those with some experience, what is your impression of such an arrangement? Win-win situation or too good to be true? Anything that you would be particularly cautious of or demand in the contract before agreeing to sign?
In order to try to recruit psychiatrists, most of the hospitals in the area offer signing bonuses and pay stipends to residents who agree to return to the area and practice. These bonuses/stipends are paid in the form of a loan that is generally forgiven over the course of one year for each year that the stipend is received. Most of these contracts also contain a clause that if a person were to not return, then the loan would be repaid to the hospital at a reasonable interest rate.
My long term goal is to open a private practice in my hometown, but I would like to work in a group practice for awhile after residency. By signing such a contract, I would be able to have a guaranteed job in such a setting and would enjoy the benefit of having handsome cash bonus now and a nice stipend during residency. The main downside that I see, is that I am basically committing to a 5 year contract that probably wouldn't begin for 5 years. Because of the exit clause and the serious shortage (hence, competition) for psychiatrists, I doubt that I would get screwed when my actual employment contract is written in 5 years, but I can't be certain.
So...for those with some experience, what is your impression of such an arrangement? Win-win situation or too good to be true? Anything that you would be particularly cautious of or demand in the contract before agreeing to sign?