- Joined
- Nov 18, 2016
- Messages
- 271
- Reaction score
- 680
So listing off the things we know:
- Step 2 ck will be the most important test for the class of 2024 (since step 1 is p/f)
- SF match is one month earlier, meaning for ophtho/uro hopefuls, they have a shorter time frame to (1) do well on step 2 ck since ophtho/uro is competitive (need to still be competitive compared to other students who can take more time in their dedicated step 2 ck period to study), (2) find away rotations (especially for students from no home programs, getting 3 or even 4 away rotations become vital), and (3) to finish publications after clinicals before the CAS due date (since more weight is assumed to be put on research because of step 1 p/f).
It seems like now more than ever, there is a greater need for ophtho/uro hopefuls especially from "low-tier" schools to complete a research year. Some of the major reasons to do so include:
- Great opportunity to do research and publish (obtaining a research mentor that knows you well can be important in the small field of ophtho)
- More time to study for step 2 ck after clinicals
- Can do month long aways to better impress letter writers
- Might be even more worth doing this as this is the safer route. The class of 2024 will be guinea pigs in regards to how PDs will review applicants without a step 1 score. Might be best to wait out a year to see what happens and meanwhile to improve your chances via research and getting good LORs, rather than go unmatched in the first application cycle.
Does this line of thinking work? Is this valid? What are some things that are overlooked?
- Step 2 ck will be the most important test for the class of 2024 (since step 1 is p/f)
- SF match is one month earlier, meaning for ophtho/uro hopefuls, they have a shorter time frame to (1) do well on step 2 ck since ophtho/uro is competitive (need to still be competitive compared to other students who can take more time in their dedicated step 2 ck period to study), (2) find away rotations (especially for students from no home programs, getting 3 or even 4 away rotations become vital), and (3) to finish publications after clinicals before the CAS due date (since more weight is assumed to be put on research because of step 1 p/f).
It seems like now more than ever, there is a greater need for ophtho/uro hopefuls especially from "low-tier" schools to complete a research year. Some of the major reasons to do so include:
- Great opportunity to do research and publish (obtaining a research mentor that knows you well can be important in the small field of ophtho)
- More time to study for step 2 ck after clinicals
- Can do month long aways to better impress letter writers
- Might be even more worth doing this as this is the safer route. The class of 2024 will be guinea pigs in regards to how PDs will review applicants without a step 1 score. Might be best to wait out a year to see what happens and meanwhile to improve your chances via research and getting good LORs, rather than go unmatched in the first application cycle.
Does this line of thinking work? Is this valid? What are some things that are overlooked?