Evaluation of Literature Regarding Specific Theories and Techniques

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

MBellows

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
607
Reaction score
2
As requested in another thread, we should probably have a specific thread for debating the literature regarding specific techniques and theories in psychology. The thread in question was speaking to psychodynamic/psychoanalytic theory, but there is no reason for the thread to be limited solely to that subject. Please feel free to post references to articles that you feel pertinent to the validation of specific theories and techniques.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Psychodynamic/Psychoanalytic references from original thread.

Comparison of cognitive-behaviour therapy with psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapy for depressed patients - a three-year follow-up study.
Huber D, Zimmermann J, Henrich G, Klug G. PMID: 22987495

Quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of psychoanalysis, long-term and short-term psychotherapy on psychiatric symptoms, work ability and functional capacity during a 5-year follow-up.
Knekt P, Lindfors O, Laaksonen MA, Renlund C, Haaramo P, Härkänen T, Virtala E; Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group. PMID: 21316768


The effectiveness of psychoanalytic-interactional psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder.
Leichsenring F, Masuhr O, Jaeger U, Dally A, Streeck U. PMID: 20925484

Abbass AA, Henderson J, Kisely S., Hancock JT. (2006). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 8;(4):CD004687

Abbass, A., Kisely, S., Kroenke, K. (2009). Short term psychodynamic therapy for somatic disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, p. 265-274.

Andersen, S. M., & Baum, A. (1994). Transference in interpersonal relations: inferences and affect based on significant-other representations. J Pers, 62(4), 459-497.

Anderson, E., & Lambert, M. (1995). Short-Term Dynamically Oriented Psychotherapy: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 503-514.

Barber, J., et al., (2000). Alliance Predicts Patients' Outcome Beyond In-Treatment Change Symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1027-1032.

Bateman,A.W., Fonagy,P. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of outpatient Mentalization-based Treatment versus Structured Clinical Management for borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry .

Bateman,A.W., Fonagy,P. (2008). 8-year follow-up of patients treated for borderline personality disorder: Mentalization-based treatment versus treatment as usual. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, 631-638.

Blatt, S. J. (1992). The differential effect of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis with anaclitic and introjective patients: The Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project revisited. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 40, 691-724.

Blatt, S. J., & Shahar, G. (2004). Psychoanalysis - with whom, for what, and how? Comparisons with psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52(2), 393-44

Clarkin, J. F., Levy, K. N., Lenzenweger, M. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2004). The Personality Disorders Institute / Borderline Personality Disorder Research Foundation randomized control trial for borderline personality disorder: Rationale, methods, and patient characteristics. Journal of Personality Disorders. 18 (1): 52-72.

Driessen, E., Cuijpers, P., de Maat, S.C,M., Abbass, A.A., de Jonghe, F. & Dekker, J.J.M.,
(2010). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(1), p. 25-36

Fonagy, P., Leigh, T., Steele, M., Steele, H., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G., Target, M., & Gerber, A. (1996). The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 22-31.

Fonagy, P., Jones, E. E., Kächele, H., Krause, R., Clarkin, J., Perron, R., Gerber, A., & Allison, E. (2001). An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis (Second ed.). London: International Psychoanalytic Association. (download or order via http://eseries.ipa.org.uk/prev/research/R-outcome.htm)

Hilsenroth, M. J. (2007). A programmatic study of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: assessment, process, outcome, and training. Psychotherapy Research, 17(1): 31-45

Høglend, P., Amlo, S., Marble, A., Bogwald, K. P., Sorbye, O., Sjaastad, M. C., et al. (2006). Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: an experimental study of transference interpretations. Am J Psychiatry, 163(10), 1739-1746.

Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Stuhr, U., Ruger, B., Beutel, M. (2003) How to study the quality of psychoanalytic treatments and their long-term effects on patients' well-being: a representative, multi-perspective follow-up study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 84, 263-290.

Leichsenring, F. (2001) Comparative Effects of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Depression: A Meta-analytic Approach. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 401-419.

Leichsenring, F., Biskup, J., Kreische,R., & Staats, H. (2005) The Gottingen study of psychoanalytic therapy: first results. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86, 433-455.

Leichsenring, F. & Leibing, E. (2003). The Effectiveness of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in the Treatment of Personality Disorders: A Meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1223-1232.

Leichensenring, F. (2009). Psychodynamic psychotherapy: A review of efficacy and effectiveness studies. In Current Clinical Psychiatry, 2009, Handbook of Evidence Based Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, Part 1, p. 3-27.

Levy, K.N., Wasserman, R.H., Scott, L.N., & Yeomans, F.E. (2009). Empirical evidence for transference-focused psychotherapy and other psychodynamic psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. In R. Levy & J.S. Ablon (Eds.), Handbook of Evidence-Based Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice (pp. 93-119). New York: Humana Press.


Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Understanding Transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method (Second ed.). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Milrod, B., Leon, A. C., Busch, F., Rudden, M., Schwalberg, M., Clarkin, J., et al. (in press). The efficacy of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for panic disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry.

Sandell, R., Blomberg, J., Lazar, A., Carlsson, J., Broberg, J., & Schubert, J. (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 921-942.

Shevrin, H., Bond, J. A., Brakel, L. A. W., Hertel, R. K., & Williams, W. J. (1996). Conscious and Unconscious Processes: Psychodynamic, Cognitive, and Neurophysiological Convergences. New York: Guilford Press.

Siefert, Caleb J., Hilsenroth, Mark J., Weinberger, Joel, Blagys, Matthew D., Ackerman, Steven J. (2006) The relationship of patient defensive functioning and alliance with therapist technique during short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. 13, 20–33.

Wallerstein, R.S. (1989) The Psychotherapy Research Project of the Menninger Foundation: an overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57 (2), 195-205.
 
Thanks MBellows.

A few more, in order to keep them up top with the other psychd/psycha resources:

Clarkin, J.F., Levy, K.N., Lenzenweger, M.F., and Kenberg, O.F. (2007). Evaluating Three Treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Multiwave Study. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 922-928.

Diguer, L., Barber, J.P., Luborsky, L. (1993). Three concomitants: Personality disorders, psychiatric severity, and outcome of dynamic psychotherapy of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1246-1248.

Doering, S., Horz, S., Rentrop, M., Fishcer-Kern, M. et al. (2010). Transference-focused psychotherapy v. treatment by community psychotherapists for borderline personality disorder: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 196, 389-395.

G. O Gabbard, G. O., & Bennett, T. J. (2006). Psychoanalytic and psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression and dysthymia. In D. J. Stein, D. J. Kupfer, A. F, Schatzberg (Eds.) Textbook of mood disorders. (pp. 389-405). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing. (review)

Hilsenroth, M. J. (2007). A programmatic study of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: Assessment, process, outcome, and training. Psychotherapy Research, 17(1), 31-45.

Hilsenroth, M. J., Ackerman, S. J., Blagys, M. D., Baity, M. R., & Mooney, M. A. (2003). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: An examination of statistical, clinically significant, and technique-specific change. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 349-357.

Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2007). Psychodynamic psychotherapy: A systematic review of techniques, indications and empirical evidence. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80, 217-228.

Simpson, S., Corney, R., Fitzgerald, P., & Beecham, J. (2003). A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychodynamic counseling for general practice patients with chronic depression. Psychological Medicine, 33, 229-239.


My intention in posting these ref's is not to flood the page, brush my hands, and say "See, it works". Rather, the "there's no body of evidence for psychoanalytic/dynamic approaches" refrain is tiring, and hopefully pulling these together can serve as a starting point.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
My intention in posting these ref's is not to flood the page, brush my hands, and say "See, it works". Rather, the "there's no body of evidence for psychoanalytic/dynamic approaches" refrain is tiring, and hopefully pulling these together can serve as a starting point.

You're welcome! And I hope that people can at least try and keep the discussion focused primarily on the articles brought up in these and future posts. If people want to quote what they have said from the previous thread about different specific studies, I'll let them do that.

The only thing that I really had to add beyond that is to restate the previously mentioned point that PA and recent time limited PD therapies are not the same, with an obvious admission that there have been some awesome recent contributions from the latter, some of which are cited above.
 
Thanks MBellows.
My intention in posting these ref's is not to flood the page, brush my hands, and say "See, it works". Rather, the "there's no body of evidence for psychoanalytic/dynamic approaches" refrain is tiring, and hopefully pulling these together can serve as a starting point.

Please do share! More readings is great - I just want to see the discussion move beyond that (and hope to contribute to it later).

My accusations in the previous thread was not necessarily that there haven't been any studies published (there clearly have - I don't know anyone that would disagree with that) its that the existing evidence is generally quite limited/weak/flawed. This is why it bothers me when I've tried to have the discussions and people have basically been citing the abstracts and completely unable to discuss design issues, etc.

Another issue is that at present, the evidence is limited to a fairly narrow scope of practice (primarily mood dx and Axis II from my reading of the lit) and many (I'd argue a vast majority) of practitioners are using it for purposes far outside that practice from the other thread, I'll once again point out...what happens if you are an analyst and someone with OCD comes into your practice. Do you refer out? My experience has been that most would not, nor would they even mention to the client the lack of evidence for their treatment plan - which in my eyes is abhorrent and the main reason I get fired up about this issue. Maybe one of the articles above addresses this but last I checked there was virtually no empirical work on analytic tx in that area. Not that its the most prevalent disorder people are likely to see in practice, but I think it speaks to broader issues.

Also agree with mbellows that we need to be clear what we are discussing. References to TL dynamic tx are not what the original discussion was about. Yes, even there I think there is plenty of room for discussion but it is worlds ahead of the traditional analytic model which I thought was the focus of our discussion.
 
Recent article of interest, comparing CBT to Psychodynamic (short term = 16 sessions) therapy for depressed outpatients.

"No significant differences between treatments were found."

Driessen E et al. The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy in the outpatient treatment of major depression: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry 2013 Sep 1; 170:1041. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12070899)
- See more at: http://www.jwatch.org/na32040/2013/...py-depressed-outpatients#sthash.qj6bFaUV.dpuf


http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleID=1734470
 
I think it's more important to examine studies that include extended follow-up [...]

Here:

Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65 (2), 98-109.

Surprised no one included this one yet. The full article for it can be found here
 
I think it's more important to examine studies that include extended follow-up and examine differential rates of relapse than to just look at race horse studies that only measure patients at the end of treatment. It may be that a variety of treatments work to help the patient get better over the course of short-term treatment, but I would argue that it's more important to know what treatment is going to sustain that change and prevent relapse over the long-term.

I agree.

MBellows, great thread. I wanted to add more to the other thread you mentioned but didn't have time to respond intelligibly. I still don't have time to reply to discussion about psychodynamic treatments not having solid evidence-based literature to back up the theories. That is a difficult question to answer without reviewing my past 6-years. There is plenty of evidence; however, unless you study dynamic theory, you may not get the point that psychodynamics is not about SHORT-TERM treatment. Intrapsychic, interpersonal, long-lasting change takes time...years. So, yes, the service delivery matters, but what matters more...is the therapist's understanding of the patient's dynamics at play and the therapist's conceptualization of those dynamics. I feel psychodynamic theory is most powerful when combined with other modes of training. I am not an analyst (yet...if ever), but I'm sure most analysts don't solely use unsubstantiated, non-empirically based treatments based on Freudian theory (circa 1920s)...if they did, it's malpractice and more harm will be done than good. That whole concept of "if it's not one thing, it's your mother," is ancient...although attachment theory IS routed in empirical-based, longitundinal studies that support it, interpersonally, relationally, dynamically, neurobiologically, socially, etc. Just start with any of Allan Schore's work...or Lyons-Ruth...or Beatrice Beebe...or Arietta Slade...I could go on and on.

I like this thread though, and thanks for sharing these references. I'll dig deep and find some myself when I pull my head out of the internship/dissertation sand.
 
Last edited:
Top