I would have definitely gloved for all of those scenarios. I really can't imagine attendings/residents caring if you glove up for an exam, I know none if mine would ever care.
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
Am I just being a germophobe? What are your guys experiences?
All three of those scenarios would dictate the use of gloves, I would say. Perhaps I'm biased as a derm guy, but if there's any question about something communicable/infectious or just plain "gross" to you, it's a good idea to wear gloves. No attending should look down on you or make fun of you, and it should definitely not offend the patients. If any patient ever says anything to you about it, simply explain that the gloves are there to protect them from you and you from them. But seriously, I can't think of any incident in the past where a patient seemed offended that I gloved up.
That said, I don't generally glove up for routine physical exams (even routine skin exams, which involve a lot of touching). Obviously exercise discretion, and if a patient has been lying in a bath of their own feces, is otherwise visibly soiled, or has gaping prurulent wounds or the like, don a pair of gloves.
This. It is called "personal protective equipment" because it protects you.
As an added benefit, it helps patients. You won't be much help to your patients if you come down with MRSA/influenza/c. diff/etc. These bugs aren't always obvious on physical exam. Protect yourself= protect your patients.
If in doubt, put gloves on. Plenty of my attendings have done disgusting things without gloves (picking at wounds, touching a dirty patient's feet, checking a femoral pulse in a really obese patient with poor hygiene).
If it's moist, wear gloves. If it's infected, wear gloves. If you can't see your hand while you're palpating something, wear gloves.
One thing you pick up on quickly after starting clinical rotations is that no one is going to look out for you regarding this issue. Attendings/Residents generally see you as an adult, and let you make your own decisions. They will, however take steps to protect the patient - but usually not you. Plus as mentioned, many attendings/residents will do some incredibly disgusting things without gloves - I have seen them touch open wounds, do pelvics/speculum exams with only one glove (poor idea), clean wounds and do abscess debridement without faceshield (only takes one bad episode to change your mind here), and do deliveries without maks/faceshield (again, only one bad time needed to change your mind here).
And ancillary staff, who are generally much more concerned with "following the rules" then we are, will see you as "the doctor" and thus will not correct you as they normally would their nursing students etc.
If you are going to walk into an isolation room/Tb room without PPE when pre-rounding, odds are no one will stop you or even take notice.
You have got to look out for yourself. Even if your attending touches an open wound without gloves, don't copy them. Yes, it is likely that nothing will come of it, and your skin is a good barrier - if it is intact - but why take the risk?
You are going to do lots of things that inadvertantly offend someone during third year. Wearing gloves is probably not the thing to worry about in this regard.
MRSA is a lot heartier and more prevalent now than when they started gathering data (1980!) in that study, and youd also need to account for geographic prevalence -- big hospitals in big cities will have higher MRSA rates due to population density, and more antibiotic abuse, I would think. Given those limitations, the percentage they cited is still not negligible -- 5% not such a small number when you have more than a dozen healthcare workers coming into your room daily. FWIW, the several residents I've known who have been swabbed were colonized so I have to think prevalence is simply higher these days.
Better to develop your palpating skills with your glove on. I started doing it after I saw my first MRSA neck abscess on a healthy skinny 30y/o man (non HIV pt). I realized if he could get it, I could get it too. (before I was more cavalier. I used to think only old people w/ comorbidities get crazy infections)
If its gross looking, glove
If its not, don't glove.
I've found it amusing to watch students glove up, then try to feel the temperature gradient in a person with an acutely thromboses artery (FAIL). Even more amused when they have tried to percuss an abdomen or, worse, a back. "I dont hear anything" Well I do, the sound of your gloves banging together. If you want to do an ACTUAL physical exam, that is, you want to gleam knowledge that adjusts your differential from your physical exam, do not wear gloves. That tactile, temperature, and general sensation is EXTREMELY limited when wearing gloves.
If you are doing a cursory exam (doing it becasue the patient expects it or because you are just going through the motions), or the exam is with your EYES and is GROSS then do glove. Im not touching nasty candidal fungus or getting near a wound with my bare skin. What if that laceration is
actually herpes? I mean seriously. Rashes, fungus, or grossness, gets a glove.
I wont fault you for wearing a glove, but I sure will make fun of you for trying to look like you know what you're doing while wearing gloves.
I wasn't saying to glove in EVERY situation. I would hope that everyone (attendings, residents, med students) is capable of using common sense when deciding whether to glove or not. Obviously if you have to check temperature gradient, or percuss, or whatever, and the area looks relatively clean, then you might be better off not gloving. If however, you are touching some orifice or some nasty looking lesion like a rash or fungal infection, then you'd damn well better glove. All I meant was that if you see a situation where you think it might be a good idea to glove (such as the scenarios I mentioned above), then do it. Exercise discretion.
Last edited: 06.20.12
Universal precautions. Wash hands, shake hands, glove, examine, deglove, wash out and you're good.
There is a cadre of "old-school" folks who will touch body fluids, soiled materials etc... You know about HepC right? Keep it clean - no patient will think it's funky. They'll think you were protecting their safety - and you are, while primarily managing your own health.
Definitely gloves, more-so for infection control. No one wants to carry around C. diff after fecal proximity. Not saying the pt had C. diff but take extra precaution when dealing with those potential situations. I've been following up with a pt, potentially TB+, and I wore gloves every time (confirmed negative as of today).
I can't tell you how many times the cultures and swab results have come back AFTER a team has already seen the patient. I've seen them put up contact precaution signs tons of times as I am walking out of the room having already examined the patient. It's stupid to rely on signs -- the patient is always non contact until the lab results come back, and by then he could have been examined several times. Glove up for everyone. Saying use your hands if an area on a patient "looks clean" is silly. How good are your eyes that you can see microscopic organisms? Please.
A lot of places put contact precautions in place as soon as a cdiff assay is sent, and they can't come off until it comes back negative.
Whoever said you can't percuss with gloves on, that's nonsense. With the exception of trying to figure out minor temperature gradients (how often do you need to do that?), pretty much the whole physical exam can be done competently while gloved. Yes you lose something in tactile sensation, but you don't lose anything important. Medicine is a game of risks and benefits. In this case the benefits do not approach the risks to patient or provider. You lose something in tactile sensation with a condom too...