Part of the problem is that over a year out, it's hard to tell what the job market is going to look like....whether you have "enough" publications will depend on who else is on the market, and what the jobs actually look like. Some places want a particular research area, others are looking to fill a teaching niche, and these aren't always evident from the job ad, either. Is it true that more publications is probably better? Probably. Another problem is that some faculty just aren't good at giving specific feedback. Any feedback you get should be taken with a grain of salt because people can only speak from their own opinion, not that of a search committee, which is possibly why folks don't want to give specifics.
If you really want to get specific feedback, I suggest actually putting together a mock application packet. Job ads for next year should start popping up soon. Pick one that you like and put together some materials for it, including the research and teaching statements as well as a cover letter. Give those things (plus a CV) to a willing faculty member with the job ad and then ask questions like "If you were on the search committee for this job (and if we are to take the ad at it's word), how would you gauge my fit for this job? Am I selling myself appropriately for this job in terms of research and teaching?" You could put notes in the margins, like "here's what I'm trying to get across with this paragraph, is it working?" You will be judged by your CV absolutely, but the statements can help you tell your story, sometimes even the process of writing them can help you figure out what you might benefit from bolstering in the next year.