I can't say I have recently compared our core rotations to Kessler, Baylor, UMichigan, Mayo, or other top programs. In terms of what we are forced to do, I'm sure we do lack in some areas. Some programs may have you do inpatient cosults, three months of SCI, etc. Our
requirements are listed on the SRH website so you can compare it with other programs. There have been a couple of changes with regards to electives and EMG time, but that's pretty much what our core rotations look like.
If you want to use your electives to do an inpatient SCI month at Kessler, you are free to do so. So, if you really feel like you are missing out on something, there's no one stopping you from doing another inpatient month. One of our PGY-4s just got hired to be an Assistant Professor at Baylor. She wanted to be in Houston and I'm sure the fact that she did several electives there probably helped. The fact is that most of our residents do stay in the Harvard system and few opt to do more inpatient months. Our average graduate is probably not as well-rounded as a Kessler or RIC grad, but they tend to be really good in the area they chose to focus on.
With regards to research, you are not forced to use any of your electives to do research. You have to submit one paper for publication and present two posters at a conference. I really don't think it's that hard to meet the research requirements. There are always a ton of studies going on and an attending would love it if you wanted to help out.
We have three months of required EMG rotations. We do two months at MGH and one month at BWH. Once again, you can do more if you want. I think we will also now have more opportunities to do them at SRH because of the new attendings we've hired. Previously, it was mainly Dr. Krivickas doing them at SRH and on the days she wasn't there, you did something else.
I want to also clarify that some of the electives are selectives and that means you need to do them within the Harvard system. The drawbacks to all these electives are small, but it is there. For example, we have a rotation in Hawaii doing Occ Med. Most people do not do this rotation for the awesome learning experience. What people learn the most on this rotation is how to surf/windsurf, how to get a tan while minimizing sunburns, and where the best sushi places are on each of the islands. If you decided to do three months is Hawaii, you'd obviously miss out on potential opportunities. The other drawback is mainly fo the department. If you do three months at Baylor, Baylor gets paid for you being there instead of SRH. This is the main reason why most programs limit your elective opportunities.
Personally, I don't think you need much more inpatient months than we have. I'm sure I am biased because I don't want to do inpatient rehabilitation, but other residents/graduates have not expressed that they felt our program was lacking. I just don't see myself learning that much more if I did do 1-2 months more on a certain floor. If I did a certain rotation at Kessler or Michigan, I might possibly learn more on that particular rotation there because they might have better teachers, but doing more doesn't necessarily mean that it is better. I think you have to also look at the quality of the attendings at each program in addition to comparing the number of months on each service.
I am confident that either UMichigan or SRH will provide you with a great overall education. While SoCal itself is great, I can't confidently say that you wouldn't be lacking in certain areas if you went to the UCLA program. While support for the program from UCLA is improving, it is nowhere near the level you will receive from UMichigan or Harvard. Don't get me wrong, I struggled with the decision of whether or not to rank a CA program at the top of my list too. I certainly know it isn't an easy decision and I know at least one person on SDN who ranked the UCLA program above SRH.