I would like to hear your thoughts on this, please. Thanks
SO why do people keep talking about the quality of rotation sites and different opportunities that the schools can provide like networking?Agree xTen million times. Holds true for every school MD or DO
Schools brag about the resources they can provide students to be successful, but ultimately it’s up to that student to network, find mentors, and take advantage of what the schools have to offer. If you just do the bare minimum to graduate and someone else is always seeking opportunities to learn and network, they will be more successful than you despite the same access to resources.SO why do people keep talking about the quality of rotation sites and different opportunities that the schools can provide like networking?
Did the NRMP release the 2020 program director survey already? I can't seem to find it.Yes and no. A lot of what you can do comes down to you. But barring rare circumstances like considerable connections, your school does have a lot to do with the ceiling of where you end up in residency. It’d be absurd for me to think I could end up in a “top 20” program in my field coming from a DO school. I have no desire to do so so it’s not a big deal but that is a real restriction. This will be further amplified in the era of p/f board exams and a recent program director survey confirmed this.
I saw it quoted from another thread but can’t find it. Sorry. Not sure if from the survey or from some webinar or something. Not making it up though. It was an official...something lol.Did the NRMP release the 2020 program director survey already? I can't seem to find it.
I believe you are thinking of the NEJM article where ~57% of PDs said where the applicant went to school would be more important.I saw it quoted from another thread but can’t find it. Sorry. Not sure if from the survey or from some webinar or something. Not making it up though. It was an official...something lol.
Because DO schools are notorious for having lower quality rotations. That's not to say everywhere is like that or all rotations at a specific school are like that. There are also plenty of MD schools that have less than ideal rotations. It definitely does make a difference when you are doing rotations with residents and doing encounters and presenting vs just following an individual preceptor around like a duckling. There is the chance that you can get some pretty solid individual preceptors who will let you have a lot of autonomy as a student though, which can also be a good experience.SO why do people keep talking about the quality of rotation sites and different opportunities that the schools can provide like networking?
That’s exactly the number so I guess so. Good detective work!I believe you are thinking of the NEJM article where ~57% of PDs said where the applicant went to school would be more important.
Because DO schools are notorious for having lower quality rotations. That's not to say everywhere is like that or all rotations at a specific school are like that. There are also plenty of MD schools that have less than ideal rotations. It definitely does make a difference when you are doing rotations with residents and doing encounters and presenting vs just following an individual preceptor around like a duckling. There is the chance that you can get some pretty solid individual preceptors who will let you have a lot of autonomy as a student though, which can also be a good experience.
SO why do people keep talking about the quality of rotation sites and different opportunities that the schools can provide like networking?
Both influence the final fate, and the equation shifts depending upon the school AND the person.I would like to hear your thoughts on this, please. Thanks