- Joined
- Jul 9, 2012
- Messages
- 9,248
- Reaction score
- 8,719
Mine was the opposite...our school tests covered a ton of material and it was pulled from multiple sources and papers. It wasn't always clear what exactly you were supposed to know because the exams were far more about linking concepts and applying them to new situations than about memorization. And if you were a lazy bum like me and spent each class mostly in a sleep-dep daze, well...it was harder to make up the ground because class covered so much more than just the textbook.Maybe you prepared for the MCAT better than them. For school tests, it's usually less overall content and professors usually are clear as to what is on the test. For the MCAT, there are many more topics and if your friends didn't focus on their weaknesses or they are not used to the MCAT, then they could have been ill prepared. If I prepared for the MCAT like I did a university exam, then I definitely would have scored under 30.
The MCAT was just...memorize the most basic facts about this clearly laid-out list of topics, then take a multiple choice exam. Sure, you had to memorize more content than for any individual class exam, but there was less critical thinking and each subject was far less in-depth than you would have gone into throughout the course.