- Joined
- Jun 4, 2006
- Messages
- 325
- Reaction score
- 1
Your participation in this survey is greatly appreciated. Thank you
I'd say probably ~45 at the time you enter medical school. At that point you'll be well over 50 before you can actually practice and even then you're only able to practice ~15-20 years before you're either too old to work or want to retire. There are exceptions, but generally I think that's it.
hell, my father is 58 and he decided to change specialties and so now he's a resident again.
Your participation in this survey is greatly appreciated. Thank you
I'd say maybe around 50+. Not because people older than that are "too old" to handle it, but because 4 years med school + about 4 years residency puts them into the working world as a physician at almost 60years old. Now, if they work until 75, that gives them a good 15 years of practice, but had their seat been given to someone half their age...you get the point. I don't want to deny someone their right to pursue their life dreams, but you have to be realistic. There are a limited number of positions in medical schools and a physician shortage that will just be getting worse. The healthcare industry wants to get the most out of each doctor.
I would say 50+ specially if they had to go back and get there pre- reqs and all. By the time that student finishes MD school, and residency they would be looking at 60-63 years old. that even gets worse if you had to take loans out to go through the whole process.
Wow? What was so profound or insulting in my post that warranted a "wow,"? From what I've heard, there is a lot of discrimination in surgical residency programs against non-trads, due to the length of training (5-7 years) and the strenuous nature (80 hours a week... ha, riiight). I made a reasonable inquiry.
Back to the topic at hand: I voted for 45+. I don't think people are too old to learn the material, master it, and become excellet doctors at this age, however I do think it is too old if it was me. It makes no sense financially to go to med school at age 46, let's say, graduate at 50, and do a 3+ year residency. You'll be 53 during your first year practicing, with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, which ensures you will be dead (most likely) before you pay it off. You will also have a family at that point, probably. You will be working like crazy as a resident, and miss out on family life. You will be a financial burden as a med student to your spouse. Also, you are taking a spot away from someone who is much younger who could be practicing for 3 times as long as you. This argument is useless on the n=1 scale, but with the increasing number of older applicants, it could start to actually make a difference in the system.
I don't see the point of doing it at around 45+ for those reasons. But I certainly would not tell anyone they are too old to do it; it's not my place.
that even gets worse if you had to take loans out to go through the whole process.
There are ages that might me too old, depending on their health...
I'll assume he's not in a surgical residency?
haha, I know of someone that might be interested in doing that (at a similar age)he was a surgeon, now he's in a psychiatry residency
I don't know of many people, even in the 50+ category, that have a spare $250,000 to pay their tuition and live off (because they probably have a mortgage, children, etc). The older med students that I know are taking out loans (at least those who have apprised me of their financial situation).Someone 50+ would often not have to take out loans because they were probably already in the workforce for a few decades.
wow, your avatar is aragorn from lord of the rings
wow, your avatar is aragorn from lord of the rings
but aragorn is cool
give it two years and you'll start feeling old. hell, I feel old and I'm only 21
I don't know of many people, even in the 50+ category, that have a spare $250,000 to pay their tuition and live off (because they probably have a mortgage, children, etc). The older med students that I know are taking out loans (at least those who have apprised me of their financial situation).
As many have mentioned, if you can keep up with the material and the workload, you're not too old to enter medicine.
With that said, how is too old for me? I'd say 26, if I'm not in medical school by then, time to move on.
On a personal level I don't entirely agree with the American medical education approach, and favor a the European model where people enter medical school right after essentially high school. This maximizes the usefulness of a trained physician and his/her ability to impact research and healthcare. Essentially you get more bang for the buck.
I can't imagine one would go back to school at 50+ without the ability to pay for it, or most of it. Are the oler med students you know really that age? It is unrealistic to expect to pay back six digit student loans when starting at that point - it takes most people more than a decade post residency. You probably can't even get private student loans at that juncture anyhow (although I suppose social security kicks in at some point).
Money is irrelevant . It's paper. Having a medical school education is key.
Anyways, there are many organizations that pay off medical school loans for exchange for medical services, e.g. military service, private sector service, government programs, etc....
Money is irrelevant after a point, but with a smaller window of employment, you won't get to that point -- was the prior poster's argument.
Military service has a strict age cut-off in terms of paying for school -- it won't help the 50+ crowd. The other programs you suggest may be viable.
30 is too old. If you are thirty and applying to medical school you might as well just start digging your own grave now. You're too old, and taking up a spot that could've gone to a younger doctor who could do better for a longer period of time. Essentially you're worthless both to the medical system and society in general that 30.
jk lol
30 is too old. If you are thirty and applying to medical school you might as well just start digging your own grave now. You're too old, and taking up a spot that could've gone to a younger doctor who could do better for a longer period of time. Essentially you're worthless both to the medical system and society in general that 30.
jk lol
30 is too old. If you are thirty and applying to medical school you might as well just start digging your own grave now. You're too old, and taking up a spot that could've gone to a younger doctor who could do better for a longer period of time. Essentially you're worthless both to the medical system and society in general that 30.
jk lol
Don't forget to tell women they lose their sex appeal by 30. Sorry, no one finds you attractive at 30; you've become a wrinkled, sagging old bag. Better get lipo and botox stat if you ever hope to seduce the pool boy again.
*ahem*
To all 10 of you so far who have suggested that 30 is too old to start medical school, I would strongly suggest that you take your rock music and hula hoops and get off of my lawn.